Negeren filosofen de prehistorie? Een reactie

References

1. Brink, G. van de (2018) Heilige Geest: Een essay over aard enwording van demenselijke natuur. Nijmegen: Valkhof Pers.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brink, G. van de (2024) De actualiteit van het archaïsche. Amsterdam: Prometheus.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Corballis, M. (2019) Mental time travel, language, and evolution, Neuropsychologia134, November.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Corbey, R. (2005) The metaphysics of apes: Negotiating the animal-human boundary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CorbeyR. (2010) De mens blijft verborgen: Helmut Plessner laveerde tussen Kant en Darwin, De Academische Boekengids79, pp. 9-11.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Corbey, R. (2012) Homo habilis ’s humanness: PhillipTobias as a philosopher, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences34, pp. 103-116.
   [Google Scholar]
7. CorbeyR., A.Jagich, K.Vaesen en Collard, M. (2016) The Acheulean handaxe: More like a bird’s song than a Beatle’s tune?Evolutionary Anthropology25(1), pp. 6-19.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Corbey, R. en W.Roebroeks (red.) (2001) Studying human origins: Disciplinary history and epistemology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 67-76.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Grosos, Ph. (2023) La philosophie au risque de la préhistoire. Parijs: Les Éditions du Cerf.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Houkes, W. en Vaesen, K. (2020) How will we find the elephant in the room? In response to: The elephant in the room: What matters cognitively in cumulative technological culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences43, e168.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hussain, T. (2018) Kreativität, Technizität und Autopoiesis: Zur Bedeutung des Homo faber für das Verständnis der frühesten Menschheitsgeschichte, Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaften12 (2), pp. 49–66.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hussain, S. T. (2019) The French-Anglophone divide in lithic research: A plea for pluralism in Palaeolithic archaeology. Proefschrift, Universiteit Leiden, alsook in press, Leiden: Sidestone Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Mazijk, C. van (2023) Waarom negeren filosofen de prehistorie? Op weg naar een philosophy of prehistory, Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte115(3), pp. 272-275.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Peeters, S en Zwart, H. (2020) Neanderthals as familiar strangers and the human spark: How the ‘golden years’ of Neanderthal research reopen the question of human uniqueness, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences42, 33
    [Google Scholar]
15. Plessner, H.1975 [1928]Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch. Einleitung in die philosophische Anthropologie. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Reybrouck, D. van (2012) From primitives to primates: A history of ethnographic and primatological analogies in the study of prehistory. Leiden: Sidestone Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sellars, R. W. (1922) Evolutionary naturalism. Chicago: Open Court.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Slurink, P. (2002) Why some apes became humans: Competition, consciousness and culture. Proefschrift, Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Slurink, P. (2014) Aap zoekt zin: Waarom wij bewustzijn, vrije wil, moraal en religie hebben. Leusden: ISVW Uitgevers.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Tilley, Chr. (2019) How does it feel? Phenomenology, excavation and sensory experience, in: R.Skeates en J.Day (red.), The Routledge handbook of sensory archaeology, Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge, pp. 76–93
    [Google Scholar]
21. Van Dyke, R. M. (2014) Phenomenology in archaeology, in: C.Smith (red.) Encyclopedia of global archaeology. New York: Springer, pp. 5909-5917.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Veldt, Maurits in ‘t (2015) The hermeneutic niche: Language within Darwinism. Proefschrift. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit.
    [Google Scholar]