Betrekken van ervaringsdeskundigen bij de afname van interviews met mensen die dakloos zijn geweest

References

1. Boesveldt, N. F. (2015). Planet Homeless: governance arrangements in Amsterdam, Copenhagen and Glasgow. Eleven International Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boesveldt, N. (forthcoming). Peer-researchers in qualitative research on homelessness and mental health: A (reflexive) journey into process and validity. In H.Busby (Ed.). Qualitative research ethics for Emerald Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity Series. Emerald Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cain, L. K., Williams, R. E., & Bradshaw, V. (2023). Establishing data quality in qualitative research: Trustworthiness, validity, and a lack of consensus. In N.Ivankova (Ed.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 336-350). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.11032-2
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chamberlain, K., Cain, T., Sheridan, J., & Dupuis, A. (2011). Pluralisms in qualitative research: From multiple methods to integrated methods. Qualitative research in psychology, 8(2), 151-169.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual review of public health, 19(1), 173-202.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B. (2008). Narrative constructionist inquiry. In Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research, 295-314. Guilford Publications.
   [Google Scholar]