De ander als wijzelf. Speels verzet tegen sociale categorisatie

References

1. Allport, G.W. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bernard, S., Proust, J. en Clément, F. (2015) Four- to six-year-old children’s sensitivity to reliability versus consensus in the endorsement of object labels. Child Development86(4), pp. 1112-1124. doi:10.1111/cdev.12366
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bessone, M. (2020) W.E.B. Du Bois and epistemic justice, Raisons politiques78(2), pp. 15-28
   [Google Scholar]
4. Campbell, B. en Manning, J. (2018) The Rise of Victimhood Culture: Microaggressions, Safe Spaces, and the New Culture Wars. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carel, H. (2008) Illness: The Cry of the Flesh. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clément, F., Koenig, M. en Harris, P. (2004) The Ontogenesis of Trust, Mind&Language19(4), pp 360-79. doi:10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00263.x
   [Google Scholar]
7. Clowes Huneke, S. (17september2023) Critically Cringe: On Susan Neiman’s “Left Is Not Woke”, Los Angeles Review of Books. Verkregen van https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/critically-cringe-on-susan-neimans-left-is-not-woke/
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cornelius, L.J. (oktober2022) Social Justice Weaponizing as a Form of Micro-Aggression, The New Social Worker. Verkregen van https://www.socialworker.com/feature-articles/practice/social-justice-weaponizing-form-of-micro-aggression/
   [Google Scholar]
9. Crenshaw, K. (1989) Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum, Vol. 1989, 1(8). Verkregen van http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dotson, K. (2011) Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing, Hypatia26(2), pp 236-257.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dros, L. (16april2021) Politieke correctheid maakt ons dom, Trouw. Verkregen van https://www.trouw.nl/religie-filosofie/politieke-correctheid-maakt-ons-dom~b0e25811/
    [Google Scholar]
12. Du Bois, W.E.B. (1920) Of the ruling of men. In: Darkwater: Voices from within the Veil. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company, pp. 78-92.
    [Google Scholar]
13. European Parliament (2022) State of play of academic freedom in the EU Member States. doi: 10.2861/466486
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fiske, S.T. (2017) Prejudices in Cultural Contexts: Shared Stereotypes (Gender, Age) versus Variable Stereotypes (Race, Ethnicity, Religion), Perspectives on Psychological Science12(5), pp. 791-799. doi:10.1177/1745691617708204
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fricker, M. (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Frye, M. (1983) The Politics of Reality. Essays in Feminist Theory. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gaynes, G. (30januari2020) How knitters got knotted in a purity spiral, Unherd. Verkregen van https://unherd.com/2020/01/cast-out-how-knitting-fell-into-a-purity-spiral/
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gelman, S.A. en Roberts, S.O. (2017) How Language Shapes the Cultural Inheritance of Categories, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114(30), pp. 7900-7907. doi:10.1073/pnas.1621073114
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gelman, S.A. en Wellman, H.M. (1991) Insides and Essences: Early Understandings of the Nonobvious, Cognition38(3), pp. 213-244.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Goffman, E. (1963) Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Goldstone, R.L., Kersten, A. en Cavalho, P.F. (2018) Categorization and concepts, in: S.Thompson-Schill (red.) Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Volume 3: Language and Thought, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1-43. doi:10.1002/9781119170174.epcn308
    [Google Scholar]
22. Greene, J. (2013) Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hacking, I. (1998) Mad Travelers: Reflections on the Reality of Transient Mental Disease. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hacking, I. (17augustus2006) Making Up People, London Review of Books28(16). Verkregen van https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v28/n16/ian-hacking/making-up-people
    [Google Scholar]
25. Harbin, A. (2016) Disorientation and Moral Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hartman, I. (28september2019) Cast off: how knitters turned nasty, The Spectator. Verkregen van https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/cast-off-how-knitters-turned-nasty/
    [Google Scholar]
27. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., en Ernst, D. (2000) Essentialist Beliefs About Social Categories, The British Journal of Social Psychology39(1), pp. 113-27.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hebdige, D. (1979) Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hingh, de (12augustus2023) Maak ruimte binnen de norm, De Volkrant. Verkregen van https://www.volkskrant.nl/kijkverder/v/2023/de-maatschappij-is-nog-steeds-bikkelhard-voor-iedereen-die-afwijkt-van-bestaande-gendernormen~v803918/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
    [Google Scholar]
30. HirschfeldL.A. (1996) Race in the Making: Cognition, Culture, and the Child’s Construction of Human Kinds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Langbert, M.Quain, A.J. en Klein, D.B. (2016) Faculty Voter Registration in Economics, History, Journalism, Law, and Psychology. Econ Journal Watch13(3), pp. 422-451.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Leshin, R.A., Leslie, S.-J. en Rhodes, M. (2021) Does It Matter How We Speak About Social Kinds? A Large, Preregistered, Online Experimental Study of How Language Shapes the Development of Essentialist Beliefs, Child Development92(4), pp. e531-e547.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lindholm, S.K. en Wickström, A. (2020) Looping Effects Related to Young People’s Mental Health: How Young People Transform the Meaning of Psychiatric Concepts, Global Studies of Childhood10(1), pp. 26-38. doi:10.1177/2043610619890058
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lugones, M. (1987) Playfulness, “World”-Travelling and Loving Perception, Hypathia2(2), pp. 3-19.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Leslie, S.J. (2015) “Hillary Clinton is the Only Man in the Obama Administration”: Dual Character Concepts, Generics, and Gender. Analytic Philosophy56(2), pp. 111-141. doi:10.1111/phib.12063
    [Google Scholar]
36. Macrae, C.N. en Bodenhausen, G.V. (2000) Social Cognition: Thinking Categorically about Others, Annual Review of Psychology51, pp. 93-120.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Manne, K. (2017) Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Markus, N. (21juli2021) Het conflict met Quinsy Gario legt het geruzie bloot in Bij1, Trouw. Verkregen van https://www.trouw.nl/politiek/het-conflict-met-quinsy-gario-legt-het-geruzie-bloot-in-bij1~b46dee54/
    [Google Scholar]
39. Mariën, F. (2022) Ik ben geen witte man. Brussel: ASP Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
40. McBryde Johnson, H. (16februari2003) Unspeakable Conversations, New York Times Magazine. Verkregen van http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/16/magazine/unspeakable-conversations.html.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Medin, D.L. en Ortony, A. (1989) Psychological essentialism. In: S.Vosniadou en A.Ortony (red.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179-195.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Mercier, Hugo (2020) Not Born Yesterday. The Science of Who We Trust and What We Believe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Moors, A. (3mei2023) EU-rapport over academische vrijheid in Nederland verwart politieke met wetenschappelijke diversiteit aan perspectieven, ScienceGuide. Verkregen van https://www.scienceguide.nl/2023/05/eu-rapport-over-academische-vrijheid-in-nederland-verwart-politieke-met-wetenschappelijke-diversiteit-aan-perspectieven/
    [Google Scholar]
44. Neiman, S. (2023) Left is not Woke. Cambridge: Polity Press
    [Google Scholar]
45. Nelson, J., Dunn, K. en Paradies, Y. (2021) Bystander Anti-Racism: A Review of the Literature, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy11(1), pp. 263-284. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01274.x
    [Google Scholar]
46. Norris, P. en Inglehart, R. (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit and Authoritarian-Populism. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Pauli, W. (18augustus2020) Waarom journalist Walter Pauli geen ‘witte man’ genoemd wil worden, Knack. Verkregen van https://www.knack.be/nieuws/waarom-journalist-walter-pauli-geen-witte-man-genoemd-wil-worden/
    [Google Scholar]
48. Radzik, L., Bennett, C., Pettigrove, G. en Sher, G. (2020) The Ethics of Social Punishment: The Enforcement of Morality in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge Core.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Rees, H.R., Rivers, A.M. en Sherman, J.W. (2019) Implementation Intentions Reduce Implicit Stereotype Activation and Application, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin45(1), pp. 37-53. doi:10.1177/0146167218775695
    [Google Scholar]
50. Rhodes, M. en Mandalaywala, T.M. (2017) The Development and Developmental Consequences of Social Essentialism, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science8(4). doi:10.1002/wcs.1437
    [Google Scholar]
51. Rhodes, M. en Baron, A. (2019) The Development of Social Categorisation, Annual Review of Developmental Psychology 2019 December1, pp. 359-386. doi:10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084824
    [Google Scholar]
52. Roberts, S.O., Ho, A.K. en Gelman, S.A. (2017) Group Presence, Category Labels, and Generic Statements Influence Children to Treat Descriptive Group Regularities as Prescriptive, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology158, pp. 19-31. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.013
    [Google Scholar]
53. Rustin, S. (30september2020). Feminists Like Me Aren’t Anti-Trans – We Just Can’t Discard the Idea of ‘Sex’, The Guardian. Verkregen van https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/30/feminists-anti-trans-idea-sex-gender-oppression
    [Google Scholar]
54. Schinkel, W. en Reekum, R. van (2019) Theorie van de kraal: Kapitaal – Ras – Fascisme. Amsterdam: Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Sie, M. (2022) Moral Responsibility for Implicit Bias and The Impact of Social Categorization, In: Pereboom, D. en Nelkin, D., The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 668-96.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Sie, M. (2018) Een reflectie op #metoo en de rol van onze morele sentimenten in desoriënterende tijden (Marjet van Loo, vert.), Filosofie en Praktijk39(2), pp. 23-40.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Sie, M. en Voorst Vader-Bours, N.M. van. (2016) Stereotypes and prejudices: Whose responsibility? Indirect personal responsibility for implicit bias, In: M.Brownstein en J.Saul (red.) Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volume 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 90-114.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Smeehuijzen, J.L., Smids, J. en Hoekstra, C. (2023) Transgenderzorg aan kinderen: Juridische bedenkingen bij het Dutch Protocol (2018), Nederlands Juristenblad1772(25), pp. 2058-2069.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Smiley, M. (1992) Moral Responsibility and the Boundary of Community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Spears, R., Lea, M. en Lee, S. (1990) De-Individuation and Group Polarization in Computer-Mediated Communication, British Journal of Social Psychology29(2), pp. 121-134. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00893.x
    [Google Scholar]
61. Srinivasan, A. (2018) The Aptness of Anger, Journal of Political Philosophy26(2), pp. 123-44. doi:10.1111/jopp.12130
    [Google Scholar]
62. Sue, D. (2010) Micro-Aggressions in Everyday Life: Race Gender and Sexual Orientation. New York, NY: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Sunstein, C.R. (1999) The Law of Group Polarization, John M. Olin Program in Law & Economics Working Paper91.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Taylor, L. (2023) “Doe eens gewoon” Politics, Identity and the Academy. Tilburg Univerity. Verkregen van https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/71895737/inaugurale_rede_Linnet_Taylor_May_12_2023.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
65. Taylor, C. (1994) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Taylor, C. (2016) The Language Animal. The Full Shape of Human Linguistic Capacity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Belknap.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Valkenberg, S. (2021) Policor in de Polder. Amsterdam: Ambo Anthos.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Walker, M. (2007) Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Wekker, G. (2018) White Innocence: Paradoxes of Colonialism and Race. Harrogate: Combined Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Wever, B. de (2023) Over Woke. Gent: Borgerhoff & Lamberigts.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Weyns, W. (2020) Saboteren in plaats van redeneren, De Reactor. Verkregen van https://www.dereactor.org/teksten/theorie-van-de-kraal-saboteren-in-plaats-van-redeneren
    [Google Scholar]
72. Weyns, W. (2021) Wie wat woke? Een cultuurkritische benadering van wat we (on) rechtvaardig vinden. Gent: Pelckmans uitgeverij.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Williams, J.P. (2007) Youth-Subcultural Studies: Sociological Traditions and Core Concepts, Sociology Compass1(2), pp. 572-593. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00043.x
    [Google Scholar]