2004
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 2950-3582

Abstract

Abstract

Jean-Paul Gagnon’s project of a “lexicon of democracy” has been able to trigger a number of different debates internal to democratic theory. This article will focus on one of them, which is: How does one conceptually distinguish democracy from non-democracy? The question seems essential to the lexicon of democracy project. The article combines four elements: (a) an acknowledgement of the need for a concept-based approach to the problem of the lexicon; (b) a defense of the methodological claim that a cogently formulated concept of democracy should be able to account for the unity of the operation through which democracy is specified, that is, for the idea that the set of interpretive questions with which theorists grapple stems from roughly the same overarching idea in need of interpretation; (c) a particular formulation of that overarching idea—i.e., of the concept of democracy—informed by a certain view of “the people” as a morally empty union of individuals; (d) an explanation of how the operation of specifying democracy from concept to conception proceeds through a set of essential questions which flow from the concept of democracy proposed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/DEMO2025.1.001.FIO
2025-04-08
2025-04-16
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. Arneson, Richard J. “Debate: Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy.” The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 1, 2003, pp. 122–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blokker, Paul. “Varieties of Populist Constitutionalism: The Transnational Dimension.” German Law Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, 2019, pp. 332–350.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brennan, Jason, and HélèneLandemore. Debating Democracy: Do We Need More or Less?Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Christiano, Thomas. “The Authority of Democracy.” The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 3, 2004, pp. 266–290.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Christiano, Thomas. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen, Jean L. “Hollow Parties and Their Movement-ization: The Populist Conundrum.” Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 45, nn. 9–10, 2019, pp. 1084–1105.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dahl, Robert A.Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven-London, Yale University Press, 1989.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dahl, Robert A. On Democracy. New Haven-London, Yale University Press, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Destri, Chiara. “Extrinsic Democratic Proceduralism: A Modest Defence.” Res Publica, vol, 27, 2021, pp. 41–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Donaldson, Sue. “Animal Agora: Animal Citizens and the Democratic Challenge.” Social Theory and Practice, vol. 46, no. 4, 2020, pp. 709–735.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Donaldson, Sue, and WillKymlicka. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Estlund, David M.Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton-Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferrara, Alessandro. Sovereignty Across Generations: Constituent Power and Political Liberalism. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fiorespino, Leonardo. Radical Democracy and Populism: A Thin Red Line?Cham, Springer, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fiorespino, Leonardo. “I Classify, Therefore I Know?” The Science of Democracy, ECPR (The Loop) Series, 2022a, https://theloop.ecpr.eu/i-classify-therefore-i-know/.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fiorespino, Leonardo. “Incompatible sovereigns: Populism, democracy and the two peoples.” Philosophy & Social Criticism, OnlineFirst 2023: https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537231182912.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fraser, Nancy. “Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Post-Westphalian World.” 2007. Transnationalizing the Public Sphere, edited by NancyFraser and KateNash, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gagnon, Jean-Paul. Evolutionary Basic Democracy: A Critical Overture. Houndmills-Basingstoke-Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gagnon, Jean-Paul. “Words of Democracy: Rescuing an Abandoned Science.” Religion & Ethics, 2021, https://www.abc.net.au/religion/words-of-democracy-an-abandoned-science/13386940?fbclid=IwAR3rOL0md3YhF2X8bqN1fARGvyoB6rNXBHIxB4VrgyPCiZt94FDcAxNCM14
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gallie, Walter B. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 56, 1956, pp. 167–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. 1992. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996, transl. by William Rehg.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Habermas, Jürgen. The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. 1998. Cambridge (MA), MIT University Press, 2001, ed. and transl. by MaxPensky.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kolodny, Niko. “Rule Over None I: What Justifies Democracy?” Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 42, no. 3, 2014, pp. 195–229.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lafont, Cristina. Democracy Without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Landemore, Hélène. Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century. Princeton-Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. McCruddenIllert, Kathleen. “Democracy by Any Other Name.” In The Science of Democracy, ECPR (The Loop) series, 2022, https://theloop.ecpr.eu/democracy-by-any-other-name/
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Meijer, Eva. When Animals Speak: Toward an Interspecies Democracy. New York, New York University Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal R.Kaltwasser. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Müller, Jan-Werner. What Is Populism? Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Näsström, Sofia. “The Legitimacy of the People.” Political Theory, vol. 35, no. 5, 2007, pp. 624–658.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Näsström, Sofia. The Spirit of Democracy: Corruption, Disintegration, Renewal. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Norris, Pippa, and RonaldInglehart. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pettit, Philip. On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. 1993. Expanded edition. New York, Columbia University Press, 2005.
  36. Rostbøll, Christian F. “The Non-Instrumental Value of Democracy: The Freedom Argument.” Constellations, vol. 22, no. 2, 2015, pp. 267–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Taggart, Paul. Populism. Buckingham, Open University Press, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Tarchi, Marco. Italia Populista. Dal Qualunquismo a Beppe Grillo. Bologna, Il Mulino, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Taylor, Christopher C.W.Socrates: A Very Short Introduction. New York, Oxford University Press, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Tushnet, Mark, and BojanBugarič. Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism. New York, Oxford University Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Urbinati, Nadia. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Valentini, Laura. “Justice, Disagreement and Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science, vol. 43, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Verdugo, Sergio. “Is It Time to Abandon the Theory of Constituent Power?” International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 21, no. 1, 2023, pp. 14–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wall, Steven. “Democracy and Equality.” The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 57, no. 228, 2007, pp. 416–438.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/DEMO2025.1.001.FIO
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error