2004
Volume 45, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0167-2444
  • E-ISSN: 2949-8651

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines Viktor Orbán’s illiberalism through the lens of Fukuyama’s concept of thymos, expanded upon with insights from Carl Schmitt’s thought. Schmitt and modern illiberals argue that the liberal democratic notion of equality fails to create sufficient societal cohesion to form a representative demos or legal framework. Using Fukuyama’s terminology, the modern illiberal aims to rehabilitate thymos as a political determinant, rejecting the possibility of achieving it through isothymia, the liberal pursuit of equality. Fukuyama praises liberal democracy for pacifying politics by neutralizing megalothymia and elevating isothymia. Illiberals, however, see this compromise as ineffective. Schmitt’s critiques, aligned with Orbán’s views, suggest that liberalism renders political unity defenseless and hypocritical. This paper provides insight into how and why an illiberal logic prioritizes collective identity over liberal equality, urging liberals to craft a stronger ideological response to rising illiberal movements globally.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2024.3.004.REES
2024-09-01
2024-10-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bánkuti, M., Halmai, G., and Scheppele, K. L., “Hungary’s Illiberal Turn: Disabling the Constitution”, Journal of Democracy23 (2012) 3, 138-146.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Castells, M., Rupture : The Crisis of Liberal Democracy. Cambridge UK: Polity Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Drinóczi, T., “The Constitutional Concept of the Historical Constitution and Illiberalism: The Case of Hungary”. iCourts Working Paper Series, no. 327, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fukuyama, F., The End of History and the Last Man, Londen: Penguin Random House, 1992 (editie 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fukuyama, F., Identity, the Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fukuyama, F, Liberalism and its Discontents, London, Profile Books Limited, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Greskovits, B., “Rebuilding the Hungarian Right through Civil Organization and Contention: The Civic Circles Movement.”EUI Working Paper RSCAS37 (2017). 5865.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hauptfelt, G., Ágnes Heller, Der Wert des Zufalls. Wenen: Edition Konturen, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hörcher, H., Ferenc, H., en Lorman, T., eds. A History of the Hungarian Constitution : Law, Government and Political Culture in Central Europe, London, England: I.B. Tauris, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hörcher, F., “Is the Historical Constitution of Hungary Still a Living Tradition? A Proposal for Reinterpretation”, Hoofdstuk 7 in The Concept of Constitution in the History of Political Thought, Górnisiewicz, A. & Szlachta, B., Warschau: De Gruyter Open Poland, 2022,
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Laruelle, M., “Illiberalism: a conceptual introduction”, East European Politics38 (2022) 2, 303-327.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D., How Democracies Die. Harlow: Penguin Books, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mounk, Y., The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Harvard University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nietzsche, F., Afgodenschemering. Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Orban, V., Speech op Balvanyos-Zomerkamp 2014 vertaald door ministerie van de premier van Hongarije, 2014https://2015-2019.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/prime-minister-viktor-orban-s-speech-at-the-25th-balvanyos-summer-free-university-and-student-camp.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Orbán, V.Speech op Balvanyos-Zomerkamp 2019 vertaald door ministerie van de premier van Hongarije, 2019https://abouthungary.hu/speeches-and-remarks/prime-minister-viktor-orbans-speech-at-the-30th-balvanyos-summer-open-university-and-student-camp.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Plato, Verzameld Werk. Baarn: Ambo, 1978.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sajó, A., Uitz, R., en Holmes, S., Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism. New York: Routledge, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Scheppele, K. L., “Autocratic Legalism”, The University of Chicago Law Review85 (2018) 2, 545–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Scheppele, K., “How Viktor Orbán Wins”, Journal of Democracy, 33 (2022) 3, 45–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Schmitt, C., Verfassungslehre. Berlijn: Duncker & Humblot, 1923 (11e editie 2010).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Schmitt, C., Het begrip politiek. Amsterdam: Boom, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Seongcheol, K., “… Because the homeland cannot be in opposition: analysing the discourses of Fidesz and Law and Justice (PiS) from opposition to power”, East European Politics37 (2021) 2, 332-351.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sloterdijk, P., Woede en Tijd. Amsterdam: Boom, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Trouw. Wilders mengt zich onder zijn extreemrechtse vrienden in Hongarijehttps://www.trouw.nl/politiek/wilders-mengt-zich-onder-zijn-extreemrechtse-vrienden-in-hongarije~b8bc5cf3/?2024.
  26. Varga, J., https://www.euronews.com/2019/11/19/judit-varga-facts-you-always-wanted-to-know-about-rule-of-law-hungary-view. 2019
  27. Vormann, B., & Weinman, M.D. (red). The Emergence of Illiberalism: Understanding a Global Phenomenon. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Zakaria, F., “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy”. Foreign Affairs76 (1997)6, 22–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Baka vs. Hongarije2014. EHRM 24mei2014, Baka vs. Hungary, appl. no. 20261/12.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Const. Hof Hongarije2021. Decision 32/2021. (XII. 20.) AB, Decision number: X/477/2021, 2021 (Vertaling site van constitutioneel hof Hongarije: https://hunconcourt.hu/decisions/decision-32-2021-on-the-joint-excercise-of-powers/_).
  31. EU-Commissie vs. Hongarije2020. HJEU C-808/18, Comission cs. Hungary, ECLI:EU:C:2020:1029.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2024.3.004.REES
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error