oa Het psychologische contract als dynamisch proces in complexe technologische contexten: inzichten uit de sociomaterialiteitstheorie

References

1. Abdallah, C., Lusiani, M., & Langley, A.(2019). Performing process research. In B.Boyd, T. R.Crook, J. K. L.Whu, & A. D.Smith (Eds.), Standing on the shoulders of giants: Traditions and innovations in research methodology (pp. 91-113). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alcover, C. M., Rico, R., Turnley, W. H., & Bolino, M. C.(2017). Understanding the changing nature of psychological contracts in 21st century organizations: A multiple-foci exchange relationships approach and proposed framework. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(1), 4-35.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Austin, J. L.(1975). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bandura, A.(2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164-180.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bankins, S.(2015). A process perspective on psychological contract change: Making sense of, and repairing, psychological contract breach and violation through employee coping actions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(8), 1071-1095.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bankins, S.(2019). A narrative approach to psychological contracts. In Y.Griep & C.Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychological contract at work (pp. 377-396). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bankins, S., & Formosa, P.(2019). When AI meets PC: Exploring the implications of workplace social robots and a human-robot psychological contract. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(2), 215-229.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bankins, S., Griep, Y., & Hansen, S. D.(2020). Charting directions for a new research era: Addressing gaps and advancing scholarship in the study of psychological contracts. European Journal of Workand Organizational Psychology, 29(2), 159-163.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Barad, K.(2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Beer, D.(2012). The comfort of mobile media: Uncovering personal attachments with everyday devices. Convergence, 18(4), 361-367.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Blau, P. M.(1964). Exchange and power in social life. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bourdieu, P.(1990). The logic of practice.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Butler, J.(1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Conway, N., & Briner, R. B.(2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A., & Shore, L. M.(2007). The employee-organization relationship: Where do we go from here?Human Resource Management Review, 17(2), 166-179.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Darling, K.(2017). ‘Who’s Johnny?’ Anthropomorphic framing in HRI, integration, and policy. In P.Lin, K.Abney, & G.Bekey (Eds.), Robot ethics 2.0 (pp. 173-192). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Das, D., De Jong, R., & Kool, L. (m.m.v. J.Gerritsen). (2020). Werken op waarde geschat: Grenzen aan digitale monitoring op de werkvloer door middel van data, algoritmen en AI. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut.
    [Google Scholar]
18. De Jong, R., Das, D., Kool, L., & Peters, M.(2020). Zicht op werk: Grenzen aan het digitaal meten van werkenden. Beleid en Maatschappij, 47(2), 183-190.
    [Google Scholar]
19. De Regt, H. C. D. G., Dooremalen, A. J. P. W., & Schouten, M. K. D.(2007). Exploring humans: An introduction to the philosophy of social sciences. Amsterdam: Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dilthey, G.(1983). Traditional hermeneutics. Reports on Philosophy, 7, 3-12.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Dirksmeier, P., & Helbrecht, I.(2008). Time, non-representational theory and the “performative turn”. Towards a new methodology in qualitative social research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.2.385
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ellul, J., Wilkinson, J., & Merton, R. K.(1964). The technological society. New York: Vintage books.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J.(2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240-1253.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Freese, C., Schalk, R., & Croon, M.(2008). De Tilburgse psychologische contract vragenlijst. Gedrag & Organisatie, 21(3), 278-294.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Giddens, A.(1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gouldner, A. W.(1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hein, S. F.(2016). The new materialism in qualitative inquiry: How compatible are the philosophies of Barad and Deleuze? Cultural Studies?Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 132-140.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Jones, M.(2014). A matter of life and death: Exploring conceptualizations of sociomateriality in the context of critical care. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 895-925.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Knapp, J. R., Diehl, M. R., & Dougan, W.(2020). Towards a social-cognitive theory of multiple psychological contracts. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(2), 200-214.
    [Google Scholar]
30. MacLeod, A., Cameron, P., Kits, O., & Tummons, J.(2019). Technologies of exposure: Videoconferenced distributed medical education as a sociomaterial practice. Academic Medicine, 94(3), 412-418.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Molm, L. D., Schaefer, D. R., & Collett, J. L.(2007). The value of reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 199-217
    [Google Scholar]
32. Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L.(1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226-256.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Obushenkova, E., Plester, B., & Haworth, N.(2018). Manager-employee psychological contracts: Enter the smartphone. Employee Relations, 40(2), 193-207.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Orlikowski, W. J.(2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-1448.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V.(2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433-474.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E.(1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rousseau, D. M.(1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121-139.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rousseau, D. M.(2001). Schema promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 511-541.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rousseau, D. M., Hansen, S. D., & Tomprou, M.(2018). A dynamic phase model of psychological contract processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(9), 1081-1098.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schalk, R., & Roe, R. E.(2007). Towards a dynamic model of the psychological contract. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37(2), 167-182.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sherman, U. P., & Morley, M. J.(2020). What do we measure and how do we elicit it? The case for the use of repertory grid technique in multi-party psychological contract research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(2), 230-242.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Stoverink, A. C., Kirkman, B. L., Mistry, S., & Rosen, B.(2020). Bouncing back together: Toward a theoretical model of work team resilience. Academy of Management Review, 45(2), 395-422. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0005
    [Google Scholar]
43. Suchman, L., & Suchman, L.A.(2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Tomprou, M., Rousseau, D. M., & Hansen, S. D.(2015). The psychological contracts of violation victims: A post-violation model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(4), 561-581.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Turkle, S. E. (Ed.). (2007). Evocative objects: Things we think with. Boston: MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Turkle, S.(2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Woodrow, C., & Guest, D. E.(2017). Knowledge acquisition and effective socialization: The role of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(4), 587-595.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Yang, Y., Griep, Y., & Vantilborgh, T.(2020). Exploring temporal changes in obligated and delivered inducements: A dynamic systems perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(2), 183-199.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Zhao, H. A. O., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J.(2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647-680.
    [Google Scholar]