2004
Volume 75, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0165-2346
  • E-ISSN: 2773-1847

Abstract

This response to the statement ‘Tot heil van heel de werkelijkheid’ questions the use of ‘sacramentality’ as key and criterium for the ecclesiology. It presents Healy's analysis of modern ecclesiology as an alternative approach, raising three questions: Firstly, can the sacramental concept really function as a heuristic model to better understand the theological meaning of the church, or is the concept too slippery for that? Secondly, to what extent are the contextual considerations of ‘Tot heil van heel de werkelijkheid’ explicit enough? What kind of ‘diagnosis’ is being made of today's church, and does this contribution provide a resolution to that? Thirdly, wouldn’t theology today do well to distinguish more explicitly the church here on earth and the triumphant church in heaven? The church on earth has not yet reached her goal: She is a pilgrim here on earth, , and needs to get her feet dirty. For an ecclesiology to be helpful in that journey, it must not start too abstractly but, above all, think through the concrete reality.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/KT2024.4.004.MULD
2024-10-01
2024-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hünermann, Peter, Bernd JochenHilberath en GuidoBausenhart. Herders Theologischer Kommentar zum Zweiten Vatikanischen Konzil, vol. 2. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gutiérrez, Gustavo. Teología de la Liberación: Perspectivas. Salamanca: Ediciones Sígueme1972.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ratzinger, Joseph. Zur Gemeinschaft gerufen. Kirche heute verstehen. Freiburg: Herder1992.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Oecumenisch Forum voor Katholiciteit, ‘Tot heil van heel de werkelijkheid,’Kerk en Theologie75/4 (2024) XX-XX.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Healy, Nicholas M.Church, World, and the Christian Life: Practical-Prophetic Ecclesiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hahnenberg, Edward P.‘The Mystical Body of Christ and Communion Ecclesiology. Historical Parallels’, Irish Theological Quarterly70/1 (2005) 3-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee, James K.Augustine and the Mystery of the Church. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Osborne, Kenan. A Theology of the Church for the Third Millennium: A Franciscan Approach. Leiden: Brill2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ward, Pete (red.). Perspectives on Ethnography and Ecclesiology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Scharen, Christian (red.). Explorations in Ecclesiology and Ethnography. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mulder, Sjoerd. ‘Practical Ecclesiology for a Pilgrim Church: The Theological Motives behind Healy's Ethnographic Turn’, Ecclesiology14/2 (2018) 164-184, https://doi.org/10.1163/17455316-01402005.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lubac, Henri de. Méditation Sur l’église. Paris: Aubier1953.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Augustinus, Aurelius (vert. HansTevel en Hansvan Reisen). De laatste visvangst. Verhandelingen 55-124 over het Johannesevangelie [In Iohannis euangelium tractatus]. Eindhoven: Damon2021.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/KT2024.4.004.MULD
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error