Collaboratieve interpretatie als instrument voor bewonersparticipatie

References

1. Agazzi, E. (2016). Scientific Realism Within Perspectivism and Perspectivism Within Scientific Realism. Axiomathes, 26(4), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-016-9304-4
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bazeley, P. (2017). Integrating Analyses in Mixed Methods Research. SAGE.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berghofer, P. (2020). Scientific perspectivism in the phenomenological tradition. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 10(3), 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00294-w
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bröer, C., Moerman, G., Wester, J. C., Rubinstein, L., Schmidt, L., Stoopendaal, A., Kruiderink, N., Hansen, C., & Sjølie, H. (2016). Open Online Research: Developing Software and Method for Collaborative Interpretation. FQS, 17(3), 27.
   [Google Scholar]
5. EmilyMiltenburg, BramGeurkink, SimonTunderman, DaanBeekers, & Josjeden Ridder. (2022). Burgerperspectieven 2022 | bericht 2. SCP (Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau).
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fagan, M. B. (2020). Explanation, Interdisciplinarity, and Perspectives Melinda Bonnie Fagan. In M.Massimi & C. D.McCoy, Understanding perspectivism: Scientific challenges and methodological prospects. Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Giere, R. N. (2006). Scientific perspectivism. University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hammersley, M. (2023). Are There Assessment Criteria for Qualitative Findings? A Challenge Facing Mixed Methods Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-24.1.3935
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664
    [Google Scholar]
11. Henriksen, D. (2016). The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013). Scientometrics, 107(2), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1849-x
    [Google Scholar]
12. Massimi, M., & McCoy, C. D. (Eds.). (2020). Understanding perspectivism: Scientific challenges and methodological prospects. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Rijshouwer, E., Uitermark, J., & De Koster, W. (2023). Wikipedia: A self-organizing bureaucracy. Information, Communication & Society, 26(7), 1285–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1994633
    [Google Scholar]
14. Rovers, E. (2022). Nuishetaanons: Oproep tot echte democratie. De Correspondent BV.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Törnberg, P. (2022). How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(42), e2207159119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207159119
    [Google Scholar]
16. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
    [Google Scholar]