Full text loading...
-
Het kwantitatief-kwalitatief onderscheid als ideaaltypisch model in het sociaalwetenschappelijk onderzoek
- Amsterdam University Press
- Source: KWALON, Volume 29, Issue 3, Nov 2024, p. 144 - 155
-
- 01 Nov 2024
Abstract
The quantitative-qualitative distinction as an ideal-typical model in social scientific research
In this essay, an argument is made to reconsider the quantitative-qualitative distinction in social science research. To make this argument clear, three main issues are discussed: 1) quantitative and qualitative scientific research can generally be seen as a specific form of problem-solving; whereby 2) the dual mental-empirical character of human reality in the formulation of the problem and the conduct of the research as a systemic whole of both perspectives is recognized and applied; and 3) the choice for a more quantitative and/or qualitative approach is not, or at least not solely, determined by the interpretive versus causal nature of the problem statement, but more broadly by the intended scope and/or depth of the evidence. Based on a clarification of these three issues, it is concluded that the quantitative-qualitative distinction can be conceived of as an ideal-typical model. In the everyday research practice, there is a large diversity of good quantitative-qualitative mixed forms. Therefore, a choice between the two research practices cannot be conceived of as being mutually exclusive alternatives on a one-dimensional dimension. Rather, it concerns a flexible choice for the optimal mix of these alternatives in relation to the specific problem within a system.