oa Klimaatbeleid in de krant

References

1. Adger, W., T.Benjaminsen, K.Brown & H.Svarstad(2001). Advancing a Political Ecology of Global Environmental Discourses. Development and Change, 32(4), 681-715.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Althaus, S., J.Edy, R.Entman & P.Phalen(1996). Revising the indexing hypothesis: Officials, media, and the Libya crisis.Political communication, 13, 407-421.
   [Google Scholar]
3. AndewegR.B.(2014). Studying political legitimacy; A critical reappraisal. Amsterdam: KNAW Conference on New Directions in Legitimacy Research.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baumgartner, F.R., De Boef, S.L. & Boydstun, A.E.(2008). The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Beetham, D. & C.Lord(1998). Legitimacy and the European Union, in: M.Nentwhich (red.), Political Theory and the European Union. Legitimacy, constitutional choice and citizenship (15-33),London/ New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Behr, R.L., & S.Iyengar(1985). Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. The Public Opinion Quarterly,49(1), 38-57.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blumer, H.(1954). What is wrong with social theory?American Sociological Review, 19(1), p. 3-10.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brewer, P.R., & K.Gross(2005). Values, Framing, and Citizens’ Thoughts about Policy Issues: Effects on Content and Quantity. Political Psychology, 26(6), 929-948.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Boenker, K.(2012). Communicating Global Climate Change: Framing Patterns in the US 24-Hour News Cycle, 2007-2009. Seattle: University of Washington.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bolsen, T., & M.A.Shapiro(2018). The US News Media, Polarization on Climate Change, and Pathways to Effective Communication. Environmental Communication, 12(2), 149-163 (10.1080/17524032.2017.1397039).
    [Google Scholar]
11. Boykoff, M.T., & J.M.Boykoff(2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6), 1190-1204 (10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cappella, J.L., & Jamieson, K.H.(1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chong, D., & J.N.Druckman(2013). Counterframing effects. The Journal of Politics, 75(1), 1-16.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Chong, D., & J.N.Druckman(2007). A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments. In: Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99-118.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Commissariaat voor de Media(2020). Digital News Report Nederland 2020. Hilversum: Commissariaat voor de Media.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cornish, F., Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T.(2013). Collaborative analysis of qualitative data. In: U.Flick (ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (p. 79-93). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dearing, J., & E.Rogers(1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dekker, P., L.van der Ham, & A.Wennekers(2018). Burgerperspectieven 2018|1. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dekker, P. & Den Ridder, J.(2020). Continu Onderzoek Burgerperspectieven (COB) 2020/1. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
    [Google Scholar]
20. De Vreese, C.(2012), New avenues for framing research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 365-375.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Doulton, H., & K.Brown(2009). Ten years to prevent catastrophe?: Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press. Global Environmental Change, 19(2), 191-202 (10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.004).
    [Google Scholar]
22. Easton, D.(1957). An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics, 9(3), 383-400.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Entman, R.M.(1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58 (10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x).
    [Google Scholar]
24. Festinger(1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fresco, L. O.(2011). Feiten in overvloed. 12e Kohnstammlezing. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gilley, B.(2006). The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: Results of 72 countries. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 499-525.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gamson, W.A.(1996). Media discourse as a framing discourse. In: A.N.Crigler (red.), The psychology of political communication (p. 111-132). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Golan, G.(2006). Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage: Assessing the influence of the New York Times on three network television evening news programs. Journalism Studies, 7, 323-333.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gorden, J.C., T.Deines, & J.Havice(2010). Global Warming Coverage in the Media: Trends in a Mexico City Newspaper. Science Communication, 32 (2), p. 143-170 (10.1177/1075547009340336).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Griskevicius, V., S.M.Cantu, & M.van Vugt(2012). The evolutionary bases for sustainable behavior: Implications for marketing, policy and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(1), 115 (10.1509/jppm.11.040).
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hmielowski, J.D., L.Feldman, T.A.Myers, A.Leiserowitz, & E.Maibach(2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23(7), 866-883 (10.1177/0963662513480091).
    [Google Scholar]
32. Iyengar and Kinder(1987): News that matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Jamieson, K.H.(1992). Dirty politics: deception, distraction and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Jones, A.(2006). How the media frame global warming: A harbinger of human extinction or endless summer fun?Eugene: University of Oregon.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kahneman, D., & A.Tversky(1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. In: Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263-91.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kleinnijenhuis, J.(2003). Het publiek volgt de media die de politiek volgen. Den Haag: Raad van Maatschappelijke Ontwikkeling.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Klingeren, M. van, H.G.Boomgaarden, & C.H.de Vreese(2017). Will conflict tear us apart? The effects of conflict and valenced media messages on polarizing attitudes toward EU immigration and border control. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(2), 543-563.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lecheler, S., & C.H.de Vreese(2011). Getting real. The duration of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 959-983.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Lind, E., & T.Tyler(1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York/ Londen: Plenum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Maibach, E.W., M.Nisbet, P.Baldwin, K.Akerlof, & G.Diao(2010). Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 299-299 (doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-299).
    [Google Scholar]
41. McCombs, M. E., & Y.Min (2006, Juni). Campaign agenda formation: The intermedia agenda setting process in a state primary election. Paper gepresenteerd tijdens het jaarlijkse congres van International Communication Association (ICA), Dresden.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Moser, S.C., & L.Dilling (red.) (2007).Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Mutz, D.C.(2007). Political Psychology and Choice. In: R.J.Dalton, & H-D.Klingemann (reds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (p. 80-99). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Netelenbos, B.(2016). Political legitimacy beyond Weber. An analytical framework. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Niederdeppe, J., S.E.Gollust, & C.L.Barry. (2014). Inoculution in competitive framing. Examining message effects on policy preferences. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(3), 634-655.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Nisbet, M.C.(2009). Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12-23.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Painter, J.(2013). Climate Change in the Media: Reporting Risk and Uncertainty. London & New York: I.B. Tauris.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Patterson, T. E.(1996). Bad news, bad governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, issue 546, 97-108.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Poortinga, W., S.Fischer, G.Böhm, L.Steg, L.Whitmarsh, & C.Ogunbode(2018). European Attitudes to Climate Change and Energy: Topline Results from Round 8 of the European Social Survey. London: European Social Survey ERIC.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Reis, R.(1999). Environmental News: Coverage of the Earth Summit by Brazilian Newspapers. Science Communication, 21(2), p. 137-155.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Richards, K.A.R., & Hemphill, M.A.(2018). A Practical Guide to Collaborative Qualitative Data Analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 225-231.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Schäfer, M.S., & S.O'Neill(2017). Frame Analysis in Climate Change Communication: Approaches for Assessing Journalists’ Minds, Online Communication and Media Portrayals. In: M.Nisbet, S.Ho, E.Markowitz, S.O'Neill, M.S.Schäfer, & J.Thaker (red.), Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Scharpf, F.W.(2006). Problem Solving Effectiveness and Democratic Accountability in the EU (Political Science Series, 107). Vienna: Institute for Advanced studies.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Scheufele, D.A., & D.Tewksbury(2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Sniderman, P.M., & S.M.Theriault(2004). The Structure of Political Argument and The Logic of Issue Framing. In: W.E.Saris, & P.M.Sniderman (reds), Studies in Public Opinion: Gauging Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error and Change. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Semetko, H.A., & P.M.Valkenburg(2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), p. 93-109.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Slothuus, R., & C.de Vreese(2010). Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects. The Journal of Politics, 72(3), 630-645.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Smith, J.(2005). Dangerous news: Media decision making about climate change risk. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1471-1482.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Sorensen, A., Clark, D. & Jordan, R.(2015). Effects of Alternative Framing on the Publics Perceived Importance of Environmental Conservation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 3, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2015.00036.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Soroka, S.N.(2014). Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Stryker, J.E., R.J.Wray, R.C.Hornik, & I.Yanovitzky(2006). Validation of Database Search Terms for Content Analysis: The Case of Cancer News Coverage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(2), 413-430.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Taber, C.S., D.Cann, & S.Kucsova (2009). The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments. Political Behavior, 31(2), 137-55.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Taber, C.S., M.Lodge, & J.Glathar(2001). The Motivated Construction of Political Judgments. In: J.H.Kuklinski (red.). Citizens and Politics (198-226). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Takahashi, B., & M.Meisner(2013). Climate change in Peruvian newspapers: The role of foreign voices in a context of vulnerability. In: Public Understanding of Science, 22(4), 427-442 (10.1177/0963662511431204).
    [Google Scholar]
65. Trilling, D., M.van Klingeren, & Y.Tsfati(2016). Selective Exposure, Political Polarization, and Possible Mediators: Evidence From the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), 189-213.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Tunstall, J.(2002). Trends in news media and political journalism. In R.Kuhn, & E.Neveu (Eds.), Political journalism: New challenges, new practices (p. 227- 241). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Tyler, T.R. (2003).Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283-357.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Van Dalen, A., C. H.de Vreese, & E.Albæk(2017). Mediated uncertainty. The negative impact of uncertainty in economic news on consumer confidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(1), 111-130.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Van der Wurff, R.(2012). Klimaatverandering als journalistieke uitdaging: een literatuurstudie. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 40(3), 271-292.Wennekers, A., & J.de Haan (2017). Nederlanders en nieuws. Gebruik van nieuwsmedia via oude en nieuwe kanalen. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Wilkins, L.(1993). Between facts and values: print media coverage of the greenhouse effect, 1987-1990. Public Understanding of Science, 2(1), 71-84 (10.1088/0963-6625/2/1/005).
    [Google Scholar]
71. ZallerJ., & S.Feldman(1992). A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 579-616.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Zucker, H.(1978). The variable nature of news media influence. In: B. D.Rubin (red.), Communication yearbook (p. 225-245). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
    [Google Scholar]