2004
Volume 100, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0025-9454
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2816

Abstract

Abstract

Centrist anti-establishment parties (CAPs) are an understudied new type of protest party, described as parties with moderate ideological views that use anti-establishment rhetoric and attract protest voters. This article explores voters’ motivations to vote for NSC, a new CAP that won 20 seats in the 2023 Dutch parliamentary elections. Resulting from 14 interviews with voters, three ideal-types can be deduced. The first type is substantive voters, who were attracted to NSC’s ideas about democratic renewal and good governance. These voters exhibit intellectualism and diplomacy when speaking about politics. The second type is affective voters, who voted for NSC because of party leader Omtzigt’s individual work in exposing political scandals. They speak about politics in an emotional, personal manner. Finally, the third type is volatile voters, who chose to vote for NSC due to positive media coverage of the party. They are more casual and less passionate about NSC than other voters. The study finds that NSC voters are resistant to the ‘protest’ label for themselves as voters and NSC as a party, implying that a rethinking of this label is needed when it comes to CAPs and to ‘protest parties’ in general. Based on the literature on protest parties, the study poses the possibility that CAPs could serve as ‘gateway’ parties to more ‘extreme’ protest parties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2025.1.005.LIND
2025-03-01
2025-04-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abou-Chadi, T. (2014). Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts. How green and radical right parties differ in their impact. British Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000155
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aharouay, L. (2023, 15november). Wat bindt de leden van NSC? Vertrouwen, hoop en afkeer van andere partijen. NRC. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2023/11/14/wat-bindt-de-leden-van-nsc-vertrouwen-hoop-en-afkeer-van-andere-partij-en-a4180877
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvarez, R. M., Kiewiet, D. R., & Núñez, L. (2018). A taxonomy of protest voting. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-120425
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bågenholm, A. (2013). The electoral fate and policy impact of “anti-corruption parties” in Central and Eastern Europe. Human Affairs, 23, 174–195https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-013-0118-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakke, E., & Sitter, N. (2013). Why do parties fail? Cleavages, government fatigue and electoral failure in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary 1992–2012. East European Politics, 29(2), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2013.786702
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Birch, S., & Dennison, J. (2019). How protest voters choose. Party Politics, 25(2), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817698857
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Sage. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB00196082
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Braband, C., & Candeias, M. (2024, 31Januari) After the split in Die Linke: the rise of Anti-Establishment Centrism?https://www.rosalux.de/en/news/id/51574/after-the-split-in-die-linke-the-rise-of-anti-establishment-centrism
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brekhus, W. (2003). Peacocks, Chameleons, Centaurs: Gay Suburbia and the Grammar of Social Identity. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7415560M/Peacocks_Chameleons_Centaurs
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Engler, S. (2020). Centrist anti-establishment parties and their protest voters: more than a superficial romance?European Political Science Review, 12(3), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773920000132
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Engler, S. (2023). Centrist Anti-Establishment Parties and Their Struggle for Survival. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fennema, M. (1997). Some conceptual issues and problems in the comparison of Anti-Immigrant parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, 3(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068897003004002
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Guth, J. L., & Nelsen, B. F. (2019). Party choice in Europe: Social cleavages and the rise of populist parties. Party Politics, 27(3), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819853965
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanley, S., & Sikk, A. (2016). Economy, corruption or floating voters? Explaining the breakthroughs of anti-establishment reform parties in eastern Europe. Party Politics, 22(4), 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814550438
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Havlík, V., & Voda, P. (2018). Cleavages, protest or voting for hope? The rise of centrist populist parties in the Czech Republic. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12299
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Henley, J. (2023, 22September). ‘A perfect storm brewing’: how anti-establishment politicians could challenge Europe this autumn. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/21/how-anti-establishment-parties-could-shape-europe-this-autumn
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hérnandez, E. (2018). Democratic discontent and support for mainstream and challenger parties: Democratic protest voting. European Union Politics, 19(3), 458–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518770812
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hloušek, V., & Kopecek, L. (2016). Origin, Ideology and Transformation of Political Parties: East-Central and Western Europe Compared. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Holmes, A. G. (2020). Researcher Positionality – A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research – A new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hooghe, M., & Dassonneville, R. (2018). A Spiral of Distrust: A Panel Study on the Relation between Political Distrust and Protest Voting in Belgium. Government and Opposition, 53(1), 104-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.18
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jacobs, K., Lubbers, M., Spierings, N., & Voogd, R. (2024, 23Maart). Kiezersonderzoek 2023, deel 4: NSC. Stuk Rood Vlees. https://stukroodvlees.nl/kiezersonderzoek-2023-deel-4-nsc/
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jämte, J., & Ellefsen, R. (2020). The consequences of soft repression. Mobilization, 25(3), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671x-25-3-383
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kemmers, R., Van Der Waal, J., & Aupers, S. (2015). Becoming politically discontented: Anti-establishment careers of Dutch nonvoters and PVV voters. Current Sociology, 64(5), 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115609651
    [Google Scholar]
  24. van der Linden, A. (2022, 26Juni). Zijn Nederlanders het vertrouwen in de politiek kwijt?NOS. https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/artikel/2434118-zijn-nederlanders-het-vertrouwen-in-de-politiek-kwijt
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Michalak, B. (2011). The anti–systemness of the protest parties. Polish Political Science, 40(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2011007
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Muis, J., Brils, T., & Gaidytė, T. (2022). Arrived in Power, and Yet Still Disgruntled? How Government Inclusion Moderates ‘Protest Voting’ for Far-Right Populist Parties in Europe. Government and Opposition, 57(4), 749-778. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.46
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Myatt, D. P. (2016). A theory of protest voting. The Economic Journal, 127(603), 1527–1567. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12333
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nieuw Sociaal Contract. (2023). Verkiezingsprogramma 2023: Tijd voor herstel. https://storage.googleapis.com/groep-pieter-website/NSC_verkiezingsprogramma_2023_v3.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  29. NOS. (2023). Uitslagen Tweede Kamerverkiezingen 2023. https://app.nos.nl/nieuws/tk2023/
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ormston, R., Spencer, L., Barnard, M., & Snape, D. (2014). The foundations of qualitative research. In Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Nicholls, C. M. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: Aguide for social science students & researchers (pp. 1–26). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Patton, D. F. (2019). Protest Voting in Eastern Germany. German Politics & Society, 37(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3167/gps.2019.370306
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pop-Eleches, G. (2010). Throwing out the Bums: Protest Voting and Unorthodox Parties after Communism. World Politics, 62(2), 221–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887110000043
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rooduijn, M., Mazepus, H., & Bakker, B. (2023, 22November). Liberale democratie als onderdeel van de politieke strijd. Stuk Rood Vlees. https://stukroodvlees.nl/liberale-democratie-als-onderdeel-van-de-politieke-strijd/
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rooduijn, M., & Otjes, S. (2023, 20November). Plaatjes van de electoraatjes 2023: Omtzigts Nieuw Sociaal Contract (NSC). Stuk Rood Vlees. https://stukroodvlees.nl/plaatjes-van-de-electoraatjes-2023-omtzigts-nieuw-sociaal-contract-nsc/
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rooduijn, M., van der Brug, W., & Lange, S. (2016). Expressing or fuelling discontent? The relationship between populist voting and political discontent. Electoral Studies, 43, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.04.006
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rovny, J., & Polk, J. (2016). Stepping in the same river twice: Stability amidst change in Eastern European party competition. European Journal of Political Research, 56, 188-198.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Transparency International. (2024). Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2025.1.005.LIND
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2025.1.005.LIND
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error