Gender accommodation in teenagers’ spelling of regular verb homophones on social media

References

1. Amasaki, S. (2010). Productivity reanalysis for unbalanced datasets with mixed-effects models. In: M.Ali Babar, M.Vierimaa & M.Oivo (eds.), Product-focused software process improvement. PROFES 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 6156. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 276-290.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Androutsopoulos, J. (2011). Language change and digital media: a review of conceptions and evidence. In: T.Kristiansen & N.Coupland (eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe. Oslo: Novus, 145-161.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baron, N.S. (2004). See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology23, 397-423.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bates, D., M.Maechler, B.Bolker & S.Walker. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67, 1-48.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Burgoon, J. K, N.E.Dunbar & H.Giles. (2017). Interaction coordination and adaption. In: A.Vinciarelli, M.Pantic, N.Magnenat-Thalmann & J.K.Burgoon (eds.), Social signal processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 78-96.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Coates, J. (1993). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language. London/New York: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Coupland, N. & T.Kristiansen. (2011). SLICE: Critical perspectives on language (de) standardization. In: T.Kristiansen & N.Coupland (eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe. Oslo: Novus Press, 11-35.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., M.Gamon & S.Dumais. (2011). Mark my words! Linguistic style accommodation in social media. In: S.Srinivasan, K.Ramamritham, A.Kumar, M. P.Ravindra, E.Bertino & R.Kumar (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th international conference on world wide web. New York: ACM, 745-754.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Deprez, W. (2021). Weg met die -D [Get rid of that -D]. De Standaard. <https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20210425_97932968>
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Decker, B. & R.Vandekerckhove. (2017). Global features of online communication in local Flemish: social and medium-related determinants. Folia Linguistica51, 253-281.
    [Google Scholar]
11. De Belder, M. (2021). Spelling mag u het leven niet zuur maken [Spelling should not make your life difficult]. De Standaard. <https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20210426_97669484>
    [Google Scholar]
12. Doyle, G., D.Yurovsky & M.C.Frank. (2016). A robust framework for estimating linguistic alignment in social media conversations. In: J.Bourdeau, J. A.Hendler, R.Nkambou, I.Hoorocks & B. Y.Zhao (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web. Montreal: ACM, 637-648.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dragojevic, M., J.Gasiorek & H.Giles. (2015). Communication accommodation theory. In: C. R.Berger & M.E.Roloff (eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, Volume 1. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, 1-21.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Eiskovits, E. (2006). Girl-talk/Boy-talk: Sex differences in adolescent speech. In: J.Coates (ed.), Language and gender: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 42-54.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Frisson, S. & D.Sandra. (2002). Homophonic forms of regularly inflected verbs have their own orthographic representations: A developmental perspective on spelling errors. Brain and Language81, 545-554.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fox, A.B., D.Bukatko, M.Hallahan & M.Crawford. (2007). The medium makes a difference: Gender similarities and differences in instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology26, 389-397.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Giles, H. & T.Ogay. (2007). Communication accommodation theory. In: B.B.Whaley & W.Samter (eds.), Explaining communication. Contemporary theories and exemplars. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 293-310.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Guiller, J. & A.Durndell. (2007). Students’ linguistic behaviour in online discussion groups: Does gender matter?Computers in Human Behavior23, 2240-2255.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hair, J.F., W.C.Black, B.J.Babin, R.E.Anderson & R.L.Tatham. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. 7th edn. New York: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hilte, L.(2019a). The social in social media writing: The impact of age, gender and social class indicators on adolescents’ informal online writing practices. PhD thesis, University of Antwerp.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hilte, L., R.Vandekerckhove & W.Daelemans. (2019b). Adolescents’ perceptions of social media writing: Has non-standard become the new standard?European Journal of Applied Linguistics7, 189-224.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hilte, L., R.Vandekerckhove & W.Daelemans. (2019c). Expressive markers in online teenage talk: A correlational analysis. Nederlandse Taalkunde23, 293-323.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hilte, L., R.Vandekerckhove & W.Daelemans. (2020a). Linguistic accommodation in teenagers’ social media writing: Convergence patterns in mixed-gender conversations. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, doi: 10.1080/09296174.2020.1807853
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hilte, L., R.Vandekerckhove & W.Daelemans. (2020b). Modeling adolescents’ online writing practices: The sociolectometry of non-standard writing on social media. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik87, 173-201.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hilte, L., R.Vandekerckhove & W.Daelemans. (2021a). Interlocutors’ age impacts teenagers’ online writing style: Accommodation in intra- and intergenerational online conversations. Frontiers in artificial intelligence4, 1-17.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hilte, L., R.Vandekerckhove & W.Daelemans. (2021b). Communicating across educational boundaries: Accommodation patterns in adolescents’ online interactions. Applied linguistics review, 1-29.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hiroux, D. (2021, April19). Moet de dt-regel op de schop? Kristien Hemmerechts: “Als je op spelling focust, verlam je mensen” [Should the dt rule be abolished? Kristien Hemmerechts: “If you focus on spelling, you paralyze people”]. Vrt.be. <https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2021/04/19/discussie-dt/>
    [Google Scholar]
28. Holmes, J. (1992). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Londen/New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change, Volume 2: Social factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ling, R. (2005). The sociolinguistics of SMS: An analysis of SMS use by a random sample of Norwegians. In: R.Ling & P.Pedersen (eds.), Front-stage/back-stage: Mobile communication and the renegotiation of the social. London: Springer-Verlag, 335-349.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ling, R., N.S.Baron, A.Lenhart & S.W.Campbell. (2014). ‘Girls text really weird’: Gender, texting and identity among teens. Journal of Children and Media8, 423-439.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Palomares, N. A., A.Giles, J.Soliz & C.Gallois. (2016). Intergroup accommodation, social categories, and identities. In: H.Giles (ed.), Communication accommodation theory. Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123-151.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Pickering, M.J. & S.Garrod. (2006). Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language and Computation4, 203-228.
    [Google Scholar]
34. R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Riordan, M.A., K.M.Markman & C.O.Stewart. (2013). Communication accommodation in instant messaging: An examination of temporal convergence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology32, 84-95.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sabater, C.P. (2017). Linguistic accommodation in online communication: The role of language and gender. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística50, 265-286.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sandra, D. (2021a, March6). Schaf de dt-regels af [Abolish the dt rules]. De Standaard. <https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20210305_98174151>
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sandra, D. (2021b, April24). Met deze nieuwe regels maak je nooit meer dt-fouten [With these new rules, you will never make verb spelling errors again]. De Standaard. <https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20210423_97737566>
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sandra, D. & L.Van Abbenyen. (2009). Frequency and analogical effects in the spelling of full-form and sublexical homophonous patterns by 12 year-old children. The Mental Lexicon4, 239-275.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sandra, D., S.Frisson & F.Daems. (1999). Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: The influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch. Brain and Language68, 277-283.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Schmitz, T., R.Chamalaun & M.Ernestus. (2018). The Dutch verb-spelling paradox in social media: A corpus study. Linguistics in the Netherlands35, 111-124.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Schwartz, H. A., J.C.Eichstaedt, M.L.Kern, L.Dziurzynski, S.M.Ramones, M.Agrawal, A.Shah, M.Kosinski, D.Stillwell, M.E.Seligman & L.H.Ungar. (2013). Personality, gender and age in the language of social media: the open-vocabulary approach. PloS one8, e73791.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Scissors, L. E., A.J.Gill & D.Gergle. (2008). Linguistic mimicry and trust in text-based CMC. In: B.Begole & D.W.McDonald (eds.), Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. New York: ACM, 277-280.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Squires, L. (2012). Whos punctuating what? Sociolinguistic variation in instant messaging. In: A.Jaffe, J.Androutsopoulos & S.Johnson (eds.), Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity and power. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 289-324.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Surkyn, H., R.Vandekerckhove & D.Sandra. (2019). Errors Outside the Lab: The interaction of a psycholinguistic and a sociolinguistic variable in the production of verb spelling errors in informal computer-mediated communication. In: J.Longhi & C.Marinica (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities (CMC-Corpora2019). Cergy: The Institute Of Digital Humanities of Cergy-Pontoise University, 59-62.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Surkyn, H., R.Vandekerckhove & D.Sandra. (2020). From experiment to real-life data: Social factors determine the rate of spelling errors on rule-governed verb homophones but not the size of the homophone dominance effect. The Mental Lexicon15, 422-463.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Surkyn, H., R.Vandekerckhove & D.Sandra. (2021). The impact of analogical effects and social factors on the spelling of partially homophonous verb forms in informal social media writing. Written Language & Literacy24, 1-37.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Tagliamonte, S. (2011). Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Taylor, R. (2001). Adolescent peer group language. In: R.Mesthrie (ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 297-302.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Vandekerckhove, R. & D.Sandra. (2016). De potentiële impact van informele online communicatie op de spellingpraktijk van Vlaamse tieners in schoolcontext. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing38, 201-234.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Van de Velde, F. (2021). Niets is erger, maar ook normaler dan een dt-fout [Nothing is worse but also more normal than a verb spelling error]. De Standaard. <https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20210427_95254184>
    [Google Scholar]
52. Van der Zanden, T., A.P.Schouten, M.B.J.Mos & E.J.Krahmer. (2020). Impression formation on online dating sites: Effects of language errors in profile texts on perceptions of profile owners’ attractiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships37, 758-778.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Verhaert, N., E.Danckaert & D.Sandra. (2016). The dual role of homophone dominance: Why homophone intrusions on regular verb forms so often go unnoticed. The Mental Lexicon11, 1-25.
    [Google Scholar]
54. VVKSO. (2006). Leerplan Nederlands secundair onderwijs bso. [Curriculum Dutch secondary education bso]. Brussel: Vlaams Verbond van het Katholiek Secundair Onderwijs. <http://ond.vvkso-ict.com/leerplannen/doc/Nederlands-2006-020.pdf>
    [Google Scholar]
55. VVKSO. (2014). Leerplan Nederlands secundair onderwijs aso-kso-tso. [Curriculum Dutch secondary education aso-kso-tso]. Brussel: Vlaams Verbond van het Katholiek Secundair Onderwijs. <http://ond.vvkso-ict.com/leerplannen/doc/Nederlands-2014-001.pdf>
    [Google Scholar]
56. Wolf, A. (2000). Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. Cyber Psychology & Behavior3, 827-833.
    [Google Scholar]