Je begint bijna te denken dat het een squib is!

References

1. Bogaards, M. (2023). Prospectief aspect in het Nederlands: Over op het punt staan en gerelateerde constructies. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 28(1), 104-116.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boogaart, R. (2020). Expressives in Argumentation: The Case of Apprehensive Straks (‘Shortly’) in Dutch. In: F.van Eemeren & B. G.Garssen (red.), From argument schemes to argumentative relations in the wild: A variety of contributions to argumentation theory. Cham: Springer, 185-204.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Boogaart, R. & M.Bogaards (te verschijnen). Aspect. In: M.Beliën (red.), Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. 3de druk.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boogaart, R., H.Jansen & M.van Leeuwen (2020). “Those are your words, not mine!” Defence strategies for denying speaker commitment. Argumentation, 35, 209-235.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Burgers, C., M.van Mulken & P. J.Schellens (2011). Finding irony: An introduction of the verbal irony procedure. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 186-205.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Burgers, C., M.van Mulken & P. J.Schellens (2012). Verbal irony: Differences in usage across written genres. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(3), 290-310.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Van Eemeren, F. H. & P.Houtlosser (2002). Strategic manoeuvring: Maintaining a delicate balance. In: F.H.van Eemeren & P.Houtlosser (red.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis. Boston: Kluwer, 119-130.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In: P.Cole & J. L.Morgan (red.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Seminar Press, 41-58.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Haeseryn, W., K.Romijn, G.Geerts, J.de Rooij & M.van den Toorn (1997a). 20.10.6 De kwantificerende bepaling (versie 2.1). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. <https://e-ans.ivdnt.org/topics/pid/ans201006lingtopic>
    [Google Scholar]
11. Haeseryn, W., K.Romijn, G.Geerts, J.de Rooij & M.van den Toorn (1997b). 28.3.3.2.ii Het gebruik van het futurum praeteriti (zou(den) + infinitief) en het futurum exactum praeteriti (zou(den) + hebben/zijn + voltooid deelwoord) (versie 2.1). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. <https://e-ans.ivdnt.org/topics/pid/ans2803030202lingtopic>
    [Google Scholar]
12. Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2009). Manoeuvring strategically with ‘praeteritio’. Argumentation, 23, 339-350.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2013). The use of hyperbole in the argumentation stage. In: D.Mohammed & M.Lewinski (red.), Virtues of argumentation: proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) May 2013 OSSA, 22-26.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Swart, H. de (1998). Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 16, 347-385.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Van Dale Online. (2024). Van Dale Uitgevers. <zoeken.vandale.nl>
    [Google Scholar]
16. Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity. Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]