oa Transcendence, Catholicism and the Challenges of Modernity

References

1. Afshari, Reza. “On Historiography of Human Rights: Reflections on Paul Gordon Lauren’s ‘The Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions Seen’,”Human Rights Quarterly29, no. 1 (February2007): 1-67.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aquinas, Thomas. The Book of Causes [Liber de causis]. Introduction and translation by DennisJ. Brand. Rev. ed. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University, 1981; 1984.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Book of Causes. Translated and annotated by VincentA. Guagliardo, CharlesR. Hess and RichardC. Taylor. Washington, DC: Catholic University of American Press, 1996.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae, part I. Translated and edited by ThomasGilby O.P.Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1969.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Assmann, Jan.From Akhenaten to Moses: Ancient Egypt and Religious Change. Cairo: The American University in Cairo, 2014.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baker, Joseph O., and BusterG. Smith. “The Nones: Social Characteristics of the Religiously Unaffiliated,”Social Forces87, no. 3 (2009): 1-13.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Barron, Marcia W.Kantian Ethics almost without Apology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bellah, Robert N., and HansJoas, eds. The Axial Age and Its Consequences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dreher, Rod. The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation. New York: Penguin Random House, 2017.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Eisenstadt, Shmuel N.Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations. Albany, NY: State University of New York, 1986.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Farmer, Paul.Pathologies of Power: Health, Human Rights, and the New War on the Poor. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Farmer, Paul., and GustavoGutierrez. The Company of the Poor: Conversations with Dr. Paul Farmer and Fr. Gustavo Gutierrez. edited by MichaelGriffin and JennieWeiss Block. New York: Orbis Books, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Grab, Wilhelm.“The Transformation of Religious Culture within Modern Societies: From Secularism to Postsecularism.” In Exploring the Postsecular: The Religious, the Political, and the Urban, edited by ArieMolendijk, JustinBeaumont, and ChristophJedan, 113-129. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Haughton, Rosemary Luling.“Transcendence and the Bewilderment of Being Modern.” In A Catholic Modernity? Charles Taylor’s Marianist Award Lecture, edited by JamesL. Heft, 65-81. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hermann, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hitchens, Christopher. God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. New York: Hachette, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hout, Michael, and ClaudeS. Fischer. “Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference: Politics and Generations,”American Sociological Review67, no. 2 (2002): 165-90.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Illingworth, Patricia M.L., ThomasPogge and LeifWenar. Giving Well. The Ethics of Philanthropy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jaspers, Karl.The Origin and Goal of History. Rev. ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953; London: Routledge, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lauren, Paul. The Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions Seen. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Noonan, John Thomas. A Church That Can and Cannot Change: The Development of Catholic Moral Teaching. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Novalis. Philosophical Writings. Translated by MargaretMahony Stoljar. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pew Research Center. “America’s Changing Religious Landscape.” Accessed November29, 2018. https://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pew Research Center. “The Religious Dimensions of the Torture Debate.” Accessed November29, 2018. http://www.pewforum.org/2009/04/29/the-religious-dimensions-of-the-torture-debate.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Pinker, Steven. Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. New York: Penguin Random House, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pöggeler, Otto. Hegels Kritik der Romantik. 2nd ed. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1956; 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pogge, Thomas. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Malden, MA: Polity, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pogge, Thomas, ed., Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor?Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rahner, Karl.“Reflections on the Unity of the Love of Neighbor and the Love of God.” In Theological Investigations, vol. 6, 231-248. Baltimore: Helicon, 1969.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Rahner, Karl.. Foundations of Christian Faith: An Introduction to the Idea of Christianity. New York: Seabury Press, 1978.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Schleiermacher, Friedrich. On Religion: Speeches to its Cultured Despisers. New York: Harper and Row, 1958.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Schüssler Fiorenza, Francis. “The Transcendence of Experience or the Experience of Transcendence: Negotiating the Difference.” In Religious Experience and Contemporary Theological Epistemology, edited by LievenBoeve, YvesDe Maeseneer and StijnVan den Bossche, 183-218. Louvain: Peeters, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Schüssler Fiorenza, Francis. “Political Theology and Postsecularism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Postsecularity, edited by JustinBeaumont, 177-189. London: Routledge, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Schüssler Fiorenza, Francis, and GordonKaufman. “God.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies, edited by MarkC. Taylor, 136-59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Taylor, Charles. Hegel and Modern Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Taylor, Charles. The Malaise of Modernity. CBC Massey Lectures. Concord, ONT: Anansi, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Taylor, Charles. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Taylor, Charles. “A Catholic Modernity?.” In ACatholic Modernity? Charles Taylor’s Marianist Award Lecture, edited by JamesL. Heft, 13-37. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Taylor, Charles. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Taylor, Charles. Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Taylor, Charles. “What does Secularism Mean?.” In Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays, 303-325. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Taylor, Charles. “Why We Need a Radical Redefinition of Secularism.” In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, edited by EduardoMendieta and JonathanVanantwerpen, 34-59. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Waltz, Susan. “Reclaiming and Rebuilding the History of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,”Third World Quarterly23, no. 3 (2002): 437-448.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Watson, Micah. “On Charles Taylor, A Secular Age – Secularism’s Fragile Buffered Selves,”Expositions3, no. 1 (2009): 97-105.
    [Google Scholar]