2004
Volume 26, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1566-7146
  • E-ISSN: 2667-1611

Abstract

Abstract

The question whether or not the sea can be owned or controlled has occupied the minds of many over the centuries. The discovery of America by Columbus made the questions of ownership of the sea and how regimes to govern the sea could be created and managed gaining importance on a global scale. The historiography of the law of the sea is mostly focussing on the ‘battle of the books’ dominated by the publication of (1609) by Hugo de Groot (Grotius) and John Selden’s (1635). This article puts this debate in its wider temporal, that is medieval context by arguing that the concept of the free sea was perfectly compatible with the adjacent or territorial sea both in legal practice and principle. The idea of the free sea, defended and made explicit by Grotius, was not new but originated in Roman law and its medieval interpretations. Rather than the free sea, was the new contribution of early modern thinking on the law of the sea. The concept of had been shaped by the division of the world’s oceans among Spain and Portugal based on the papal bull (1493) and the treaties of Tordesillas (1494) and Zaragoza (1529).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/PROM2024.2.003.SICK
2024-12-01
2025-01-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anuario Mexicano de Historia del Derecho nr. 5 (1993) [Themanummer over de Alexandrijnse bullen en vijf eeuwen historiografie]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. B.Allaire, ‘Between Oléron and Colbert: The Evolution of French Maritime Law until the Seventeenth Century’, in MariaFusaro, B.Allaire, R.Blakemore, T.Vanneste, M.Dunford, red., Labour and Empire Comparative Perspectives on Seafarers, c. 1500-1800, Londen etc., 2015, 77-99.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DavidArmitage, The Ideological Origins of the British Empire, Cambridge, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LaurenBenton, A Search for Sovereignty Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900, Cambridge, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. RichardBlakemore, ‘Law and the Sea’ in: ClaireJowitt, CraigLambert, and SteveMentz, red., Routledge Research Companion to Marine and Maritime Worlds, 1400-1800, London, 2020, 388-425.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PeterBorschberg, ‘Hugo Grotius’ theory of Trans-Oceanic Trade Regulation. Revisiting Mare Liberum (1609)’, International Law and Justice Working Papers, Augustus2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. PeterBorschberg, Hugo Grotius, the Portuguese and free trade in the East Indies, Singapore, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GuillaumeCalafat, Une mer jalousée. Contribution à l’histoire de la souveraineté (Méditerranée, XVIIe siècle), Paris, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Paulino CastañedaDelgado, ‘La interpretación teocrática de las bulas alejandrinas’, Anuario Mexicano de Historia del Derecho5, 1993, 20-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. JörgFisch, Die Europäische Expansion und das Völkerrechts. Die Auseinandersetzungen um den Status der überseeischen Gebiete vom 15. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart, Stuttgart, 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DanteFedele, The Medieval Foundations of International Law. Baldus de Ubaldis (1327–1400), Doctrine and Practice of the Ius Gentium, Leiden en Boston, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Thomas Wemyss, Fulton, The Sovereignty of the Sea, Londen, 1911.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hugode Groot, De vrije zee. Een uiteenzetting over het recht van de Nederlanders om handel te drijven in Oost-Indië, ArthurEyffinger, red., z.p., 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HugoGrotius, Mare Liberum 1609-2009. Original Latin Text (facsimile of the first edition, 1609) and Modern English Translation. RobertFeenstra en JeroenVervliet, red., Leiden en Boston, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MichaelKempe, Fluch der Weltmeere. Piraterie, Völkerrecht und Internationale Beziehungen 1500-1900, Frankfurt am Main, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Miguel Angel LaderoQuesada, ‘Los debates sobre el Mare Clausum’, Cuadernos de Historia de España, 74, 1997, 233-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HenkNellen, Hugo de Groot. Een leven in strijd om de vrede, 1583-1645, Amsterdam, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. JohannaK.Oudendijk, Status and Extent of Adjacent Waters. A Historical Orientation, Leiden, 1970.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LouisSicking, ‘The pirate and the admiral. Europeanisation and globalisation of maritime conflict management’, Journal of the History of International Law, 20, 2018, 429-470.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. G.J.Toomer, John Selden: A Life in Scholarship, 2 vols., Oxford, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Martine Juliavan Ittersum, Profit and Principle. Hugo Grotius, Natural Rights Theories and the Rise of Dutch Power in the East Indies (1595-1615), Leiden en Boston, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Martine Juliavan Ittersum, Martinevan Ittersum, ‘The Long Goodbye: Hugo Grotius’ justification of Dutch expansion overseas, 1615-1645’, History of European Ideas, 36, 2010, 386-411.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Martine Juliavan Ittersum, The Working Papers of Hugo Grotius. Transmission, Dispersal, and Loss, 1604-1864, Leiden en Boston, 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Monica B.Vieira, ‘Mare liberum vs. Mare clausum: Grotius, Freitas, and Selden’s debate on dominion over the seas’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 64, 2003, 361–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. AlainWijffels, red., Alberico Gentili consiliatore. Atti del convegno. Quinta giornata gentiliana, 19 Settembre 1992, Milaan, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/PROM2024.2.003.SICK
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/PROM2024.2.003.SICK
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error