2004
Volume 77, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0039-8691
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1214

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TET2025.1.001.PING
2025-03-01
2025-04-10
The full text of this item is not currently available.

References

  1. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language59, 390–412.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biemans, M. (2000). Gender variation in voice quality. Radboud University Nijmegen, Ph.D. Dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boland, J. E., Kaan, E., Valdés Kroff, J., & Wulff, S. (2016). Psycholinguistics and variation in language processing. Linguistics Vanguard2(s1), 20160064.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boves, T. (1992). Speech accommodation in co-operative and competitive conversations. Radboud University Nijmegen, Ph.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science25(1), 7–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Eckert, P. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology41, 87–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Eckert, P. (2025). Third Wave Variation Studies. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/~eckert/thirdwave.html, 21January2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Geeraerts, D. & Kristiansen, G. (2014). Cognitive linguistics and linguistic variation. In JeannetteLittlemore and JohnTaylor (eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics (pp. 202–217). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Mindless statistics. The Journal of Socio-Economics33(5), 587–606.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Giles, H., Taylor, D. M., & Bourhis, R. (1973). Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: Some Canadian data. Language in Society2(2), 177–192.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gooskens, C. (1997). On the role of prosodic and verbal information in the perception of Dutch and English varieties. Radboud University Nijmegen, Ph.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Labov, W. (1972). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society1(1), 97–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Labov, W. & Ash, S. (1997). Understanding Birmingham. In C.Bernstein, T.Nunnally and R.Sabino (eds.) Language Variety in the South Revisited (pp. 508–573). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Labov, W., Baranowski, M., & Dinkin, A. (2010). The effect of outliers on the perception of sound change. Language Variation and Change22(2), 175–190.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Labov, W., & Baranowski, M. (2006). 50 msec. Language Variation and Change18(3), 223–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lambert, W.E. et al. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Pyschology60, 44–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lanwermeyer, M., Henrich, K., Rocholl, M. J., Schnell, H. T., Werth, A., Herrgen, J., & Schmidt, J. E. (2016). Dialect variation influences the phonological and lexical-semantic word processing in sentences. Electrophysiological evidence from a cross-dialectal comprehension study. Frontiers in Psychology7, 739.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Levon, E., & Fox, S. (2014). Social salience and the sociolinguistic monitor: A case study of ING and TH-fronting in Britain. Journal of English Linguistics42(3), 185-217.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Maye, J., Aslin, R. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). The weckud wetch of the wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent. Cognitive Science32(3), 543–562.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Pharao, N., Maegaard, M., Møller, J. S., & Kristiansen, T. (2014). Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society43(1), 1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosseel, L., Speelman, D. & Geeraerts, D. (2019). Measuring language attitudes in context: Exploring the potential of the Personalized Implicit Association Test. Language in Society48, 1–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Van de Velde, H., Pinget, A.-F.Voeten, C. & Demolin, D. (2021). Laboratory Sociolinguistics: a new approach to language variation. In K.Franco, S.De Pascale, L.Rosseel, G.Kristiansen & W.Zhang (eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics revisited (pp. 557–571). Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wood, S. N. (2017). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. 2nd edn. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/TET2025.1.001.PING
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error