oa Een pleidooi voor radicale liefde

References

1. Anderson, E.(2012). The monogamy gap: Men, love, and the reality of cheating. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Beasley, C., Brook, H., & Holmes, M.(2012). Heterosexuality in theory and practice. Londen: Taylor & Francis.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brown, W.(2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Butler, J.(2006). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Londen: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. De Graeve, K. (2018a). Embodied knowledge through intimate field relationships: Drawing the contours of an ethics of vulnerability. Artikel ingediend voor publicatie.
   [Google Scholar]
6. De Graeve, K. (2018b). ‘No expectations’: Straight men’s sexual and moral identity making in non-monogamous dating. Sexualities. doi.org/10.1177/1363460718779946.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Emens, E.F.(2004). Monogamy’s law: Compulsory monogamy and polyamorous existence. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 29, 277–376.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Federici, S.(2004). Caliban and the witch: Women, the body and primitive accumulation (1e editie). New York: Autonomedia.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Friedman, M.(2000). Autonomy, social disruption, and women. In C.Mackenzie & N.Stoljar (Eds.), Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self (pp. 35–51). New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Giddens, A.(2013). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gilligan, C.(1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gilson, E.(2013). The ethics of vulnerability: A feminist analysis of social life and practice. New York: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gray, J.(2004). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: The classic guide to understanding the opposite sex. New York: HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Haraway, D.(1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Held, V.(2006). The ethics of care: personal, political, and global. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. hooks, b.(2001). All about love: New visions. New York: HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
17. hooks, b.(2004). The will to change: Men, masculinity, and love. New York: Atria Books.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Horvat, S.(2016). The radicality of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hubbard, R.(1990). The political nature of ‘human nature’. In D.L.Rhode (Ed.), Theoretical perspectives on sexual difference (pp. 63–73). New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Illouz, E.(2008). Saving the modern soul: Therapy, emotions, and the culture of self-help. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Illouz, E.(2013). Why love hurts: A sociological explanation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Illouz, E.(2015). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jackson, S.(1999). Heterosexuality in question. Londen: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Luyten, D., & Eggermont, S.(2017). Maatschappij, gezinspolitiek en familierecht. In D.Luyten, H.Van Crombrugge, & K.Emmery (Eds.), Het gezin in Vlaanderen 2.0: Over het eigene van gezinnen en gezinsbeleid (pp. 77–112). Antwerpen: Garant.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Murray, A.S.(2013). Forsaking all others: a bifeminist discussion of compulsory monogamy. In 
N.Tucker, L.Highleyman, & R.Kaplan (Eds.), Bisexual politics: Theories, queries, and visions (pp. 293–304). New York: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Okely, J.(2001). Anthropology and autobiography: Participatory experience and embodied knowledge. In C.Callaway & J.Okeley (Eds.), Anthropology and autobiography (pp. 1–28). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Nordgren, A.(2012). Relationship anarchy: A short manifesto. Verkregen van theanarchistlibrary.org
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rich, A.(1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631–660. doi:10.1086/493756
    [Google Scholar]
29. Robinson, V.(1997). My baby just cares for me: Feminism, heterosexuality and non-monogamy. Journal of Gender Studies, 6(2), 143–157. doi:10.1080/09589236.1997.9960678
    [Google Scholar]
30. Rosa, B.(1994). Anti-monogamy: a radical challenge to compulsory heterosexuality? In G.Griffin (Ed.), Stirring it: challenges for feminism (pp. 107–120). Londen: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Rose, N.(1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2e editie). Londen: Free Association Books.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Rubin, G.S.(1998). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In P.M.Nardi & B.E.Schneider (Eds.), Social perspectives in lesbian and gay studies: A reader (pp. 100–133). Londen: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Rudder, C.(2014). Dataclysm: Who we are (when we think no one’s looking). New York: Random House of Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Tronto, J.C.(1987). Beyond gender difference to a theory of care. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12(4), 644–663. doi:10.1086/494360
    [Google Scholar]
35. van Saarloos, S.(2015). Het monogame drama. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Verhaeghe, P.(2012). De neoliberale waanzin. Flexibel, efficiënt en … gestoord. Brussel: VUB-Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Wilkinson, E.(2010). What’s queer about non-monogamy now? In M.Barker & D.Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 243–254). New York: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wilkinson, E.(2012). The romantic imaginary: Compulsory coupledom and single existence. In S.Hines & Y.Taylor (Eds.), Sexualities: Past reflections, future directions (pp. 130–148). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Willey, A.(2016). Undoing monogamy: The politics of science and the possibilities of biology. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]