oa ‘Work!’ Ballroom discipline, faking, and the production of queer freedom

References

1. Baer, P. (2021). Vogue femme as affective anti-oppression education. In A.Harris & S.Holman Jones (Eds.), Affective movements, methods and pedagogies (pp. 41–59). London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bailey, M. (2011). Gender/racial realness: Theorizing the gender system in ballroom culture. Feminist Studies, 37(2), 356–386.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bailey, M. (2013). Butch queens up in pumps: Gender, performance, and ballroom culture in Detroit. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bock, E. (2021). Cultivating (in)attention, listening to noise. Invisible Culture, 32. https://doi.org/10.47761/494a02f6.eb27df12.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Boston, N. & Duyvendak, J. W. (2015). People of color mobilization in LGBT organisations in the Netherlands and the United States. In D.Paternotte & M.Tremblay (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to lesbian and gay activism (pp. 15–148). Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Butler, J. (2008). Sexual politics, torture, and secular time. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(1), 1–23.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chatzipapatheodoridis, C. (2017). Strike a pose, forever: The legacy of vogue and its re- contextualization in contemporary camp performances. European Journal of American Studies, 11(3), 1–16.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Colpani, G. & Isenia, W.J. (2018). Strange fruits: Queer of color intellectual labor in the Netherlands in the 1980s and 1990s. In S.Ponzanesi & A. J.Habed (Eds.), Postcolonial intellectuals in Europe. Critics, artists, movements, and their publics (pp. 213–230). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Colpani, G., Isenia, W.J., & Pieter, N. (2019). Archiving queer of colour politics in the Netherlands. A roundtable conversation. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 22(2), 163–182.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dave, N. (2012). Queer activism in Indian. A story in the anthropology of ethics. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In R.Castronovo & D. D.Nelson (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politic (pp. 175–194). Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fadil, N. (2013). Performing the salat at work: Secular and pious muslims negotiating the contours of the public in Belgium. Ethnicities, 13(6), 729–750.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Frank, C. (2019). Sister outsider and Audre Lorde in the Netherlands: On transnational queer feminism and archival methodological practices. Feminist Review, 121, 9–23.
    [Google Scholar]
14. El-Tayeb, F. (2012). “Gays who cannot properly be gay”: Queer muslims in the neoliberal European city. European Journal of Woman’s Studies, 19(1), 79–95.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hekma, G., & Duyvendak, J.W. (2011). Queer Netherlands: A puzzling example. Amsterdam Research Centre for Gender and Sexuality, 14(6), 625–631.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hosking, T. (2019). De ballroomscene is het zat dat iedereen met hun cultuur aan de haal gaat. Vice. Retrieved from https://www.vice.com/nl/article/a3xmje/de-ballroomleiders-vechten-tegen-toe-eigening-van-afgelopen-jaren.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jivraj, S., & de Jong, A. (2011). The Dutch homo-emancipation policy and its silencing effects on queer muslims. Feminist Legal Studies, 19(2), 143–158.
    [Google Scholar]
18. King, R. S. (2015). When we start thinking: Charl Landvreugd’s multivalent Afropean aesthetic. Small axe [Carribean Queer Visualities], 19(1), 60–71.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Knijnenburg, L. (2021). “Kom naar de balls, honey, en vind jezelf”. De Groene Amsterdammer, 50–52. Retrieved from https://www.groene.nl/artikel/komnaar-de-balls-honey-en-vind-jezelf.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kunsthal (2021). Deep in vogue. Celebrating ballroom culture. [Exhibition] Rotterdam: Kunsthal Rotterdam, 18September2021 until 13March2022.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lino e Silva, M. (2022). Minoritarian liberalism. Travesti life in a Brazilian favela. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Mahmood, S. (2001). Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology, 16(2), 202–236.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Mayanthi, L. (2010). Reconfiguring freedom: Muslim piety and the limits of secular law and public discourse in France. American Ethnologist, 37(1), 19–35.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mepschen, P., Duyvendak, J.W., & Tonkens, E.H. (2010). Sexual politics, orientalism and multicultural citizenship in the Netherlands. Sociology, 44(5), 962–979.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages. Homonationalism in queer times. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Wekker, G. (2016). White innocence, paradoxes of colonialism and race. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Wilf, E. (2010). Swinging within the iron cage: Modernity, creativity, and embodied practice in American postsecondary jazz education. American Ethnologist, 37(3), 563–582.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Wilf, E. (2012). Rituals of creativity: Tradition, modernity, and the ‘acoustic unconscious’ in a U.S. collegiate jazz music program. American Ethnologist, 114(1), 32–44.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Yildiz, A. (2016). “Turkish, Dutch, gay and proud”: Mapping out the contours of agency in homonationalist times. Sexualities, 20(5–6), 699–714.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Zemke, K. & Mackley-Crump, J. (2019). “Sissy that walk”: Reframing queer Pacific bodies through the FAFSWAG Ball. Queer Studies in Media & Popular Culture, 4(1), 85–98.
    [Google Scholar]