oa The Gender Sensitivity of Parliament through its Symbolic Function

References

1. Ahrens, P., & Erzeel, S. (2024). Handbook. Beyond numbers: Stories of gender equality in and through parliaments. INTER PARES/IDEA.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bilsland, K., & Siebert, S. (2024). Walking interviews in organizational research. European Management Journal, 42(2), 161-172.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Celis, K., & Wauters, B. (2010). Pinning the butterfly: women, blue-collar and ethnic minority MPs vis-à-vis parliamentary norms and the parliamentary role of the group representative. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(3), 380–393.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Childs, S. (2016). The good parliament. Bristol: University of Bristol.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Childs, S., & Palmieri, S. (2023). Gender sensitive parliaments: Feminizing formal political institutions. In M.Sawer, L. A.Banaszak, J.True, & J.Kantola (Eds.), Handbook on feminist governance, (174–188). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Thematic Analysis, 1–100.
   [Google Scholar]
7. De Kamer. (2023). Naar een meer genderbewust parlement tegen 2030. https://www.dekamer.be/kvvcr/pdf_sections/news/0000019293/powerpoint_2023_03_07.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dovi, S. (2007). Theorizing women’s representation in the United States. Politics & Gender, 3(3), 297–319.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Erikson, J., & Josefsson, C. (2019). The legislature as a gendered workplace: Exploring members of parliament’s experiences of working in the Swedish parliament. International Political Science Review, 40(2), 197–214.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Erikson, J., & Josefsson, C. (2022). The Parliament as a gendered workplace: How to research legislators’(UN) equal opportunities to represent. Parliamentary Affairs, 75(1), 20–38.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Erikson, J., & Verge, T. (2022). Gender, power and privilege in the parliamentary workplace. Parliamentary Affairs75(1), 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
12. European Institute for Gender Equality. (2019). Gender equality in national parliaments across the EU and the European Parliament 2019 results from EIGE’s Gender-sensitive Parliaments tool. https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/mh0419527enn_002.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fahie, D. (2014). Doing Sensitive Research Sensitively: Ethical and Methodological Issues in Researching Workplace Bullying. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 19–36.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Galligan, Y. & Meier, P. (2016, July). The Gender-Sensitive Parliament: Recognising the Gendered Nature of Parliaments. Conference Paper Given to IPSA World Congress, Poznan, Poland.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Grace, J., & Sawer, M. (2016). Representing gender equality: specialised parliamentary bodies. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(4), 745-747.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2008). Equality in politics: A survey of women and men in parliaments. Retrieved 15January2023 from https://www.ipu.org.
17. Kirkwood, J., & Warren, L. (2020). Legitimizing entrepreneurial success in an environment of Tall Poppy syndrome: Lessons from celebrity entrepreneurs in New Zealand. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 21(2), 101–112.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Leston-Bandeira, C. (2012). Parliaments’ Endless Pursuit of Trust: Re-focusing on Symbolic Representation. Journal of Legislative Studies, 18(3–4), 514–526.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2014). The Symbolic Representation of Gender: A Discursive Approach. London: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2017). Capturing in words what a symbol symbolises? Challenges for studying symbolic representation from a discursive approach. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(3), 482–487.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2018). Good symbolic representation: the relevance of inclusion. PS: Political Science & Politics51(2), 327–330.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2019). The Significance of Symbolic Representation for Gender Issues in Politics. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 27(4), 231–244.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lovenduski, J. (2005). Feminizing politics. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lovenduski, J. (2014). The Institutionalisation of Sexism in Politics. Political Insight, 5(2), 16–19.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mackay, F. (2010). Conclusion: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. In F.Mackay, & M. L.Krook (Eds.), Gender, Politics and Instituions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism, (181–196). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mackay, F. (2014). Nested Newness, Institutional Innovation, and the Gendered Limits of Change. Politics & Gender, 10(4), 549–571.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Meier, P., & Verge, T. (2017). Conceptual and methodological challenges in the study of symbolic representation – an introduction. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(3), 478–481.
    [Google Scholar]
28. O’Neill, M., & Roberts, B. (2019). Walking methods: Research on the move. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. (2021). Realizing gender equality in parliament. A guide for parliaments in the OSCE region.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Palmieri, S. (2018). Gender-Sensitive parliaments. In Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.215
    [Google Scholar]
31. Palmieri, S. (2019). Feminist institutionalism and gender-sensitive parliaments: relating theory and practice. Gender Innovation in Political Science: New Norms, New Knowledge, 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75850-3_9
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Puwar, N. (2004). Space invaders: Race, gender and bodies out of place. Oxford: BERG.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Rai, S. M. (2010). Analysing ceremony and ritual in parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(3), 284–297.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Rai, S. M., & Spary, C. (2019). Performing Representation: Women Members in the Indian parliament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Saward, M. (2006). The representative claim. Contemporary political theory, 5(3), 297–318.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Saward, M. (2010). The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Senate. (2021, March8). Kamervoorzitster Tillieux en Senaatsvoorzitster D’Hose maken het Belgische Parlement meer genderbewust. https://www.senate.be/event/20210308-international_womens_day/20210308-international_womens_day_nl.html
    [Google Scholar]
39. Verge, T. (2022). A Chamber of One’s Own: Institutional Claim-Making on Gender Equality and the Symbolic Role of Parliaments. Politics and Gender, 18(1), 95–125.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Verge, T. (2022). Evoking Equality: The Gender Sensitivity of Parliaments through their Symbolic Function. Political Studies, 70(4), 1048–1067.
    [Google Scholar]