oa Wat leert onderzoek naar overtuigende teksten over het ontwerpen van overtuigender teksten?

References

1. Angie, A. D., Connelly, S., Waples, E. P., & Kligyte, V.(2011). The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making: A meta-analytic review. Cognition & Emotion, 25(8), 1393-1422.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anker, A. E., Feeley, T. H., McCracken, B., & Lagoe, C. A.(2016). Measuring the effectiveness of mass-mediated health campaigns through meta-analysis. Journal of Health Communication, 21(4), 439-456.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baumeister, R. F., & Bargh, J. A.(2014). Conscious and unconscious. In J. W.Sherman, B.Gawronski, & Y.Trope (Eds.), Dual-process Theories of the Social Mind (pp. 35-49). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P.(2016). Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs, 83(4), 446-467.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Calanchini, J., Moons, W. G., & Mackie, D. M.(2016). Angry expressions induce extensive processing of persuasive appeals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 64, 88-98.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Carpenter, C. J.(2015). A meta-analysis of the ELM’s argument quality×processing type predictions. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 501-534.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chu, S. C., & Kamal, S.(2008). The effect of perceived blogger credibility and argument quality on message elaboration and brand attitudes: An exploratory study. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8, 26-37.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cialdini, R. B.(2001). Influence. Science and Practice (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cohen, J.(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Graaf, A., Sanders, J., & Hoeken, H.(2016). Characteristics of narrative interventions and health effects: A review of the content, form, and context of narratives in health-related narrative persuasion research. Review of Communication Research, 4, 88-131.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dillard, J. P., Hunter, J. E., & Burgoon, M.(1984). Sequential-request persuasive strategies. Human Communication Research, 10(4), 461-488.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eerland, A., & Van den Bergh, H.(2016). Empirische basis van conclusies. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 38(2), 139-146.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Eisend, M.(2006). Two-sided advertising: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(2), 187-198.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Eisend, M.(2011). How humor in advertising works: A meta-analytic test of alternative models. Marketing Letters, 22(2), 115-132.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Eisend, M.(2017). Meta-Analysis in advertising research. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 21-35.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Eisend, M., & Tarrahi, F.(2016). The effectiveness of advertising: A meta-meta-analysis of advertising inputs and outcomes. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 519-531.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Feeley, T. H., Anker, A. E., & Aloe, A. M.(2012). The door-in-the-face persuasive message strategy: A meta-analysis of the first 35 years. Communication Monographs, 79(3), 316-343.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Feeley, T. H., & Moon, S. I.(2009). A meta-analytic review of communication campaigns to promote organ donation. Communication Reports, 22(2), 63-73.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ferguson, C. J., & Heene, M.(2012). A vast graveyard of undead theories: Publication bias and psychological science’s aversion to the null. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 555-561.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fishbein, M., & Yzer, M.C.(2003). Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory, 14(2),164-183.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gollwitzer, P. M.(1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P.(2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hoeken, H.(2001). Anecdotal, statistical, and causal evidence: Their perceived and actual persuasiveness. Argumentation, 15(4), 425-437.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S.(1983). Generalizing about messages: Suggestions for design and analysis of experiments. Human Communication Research, 9, 169-181.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kahneman, D.(2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kumkale, G. T., Albarracín, D., & Seignourel, P. J.(2010). The effects of source credibility in the presence or absence of prior attitudes: Implications for the design of persuasive communication campaigns. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(6), 1325-1356.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. T.(2001). Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Manning, M.(2009). The effects of subjective norms on behaviour in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 649-705.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Meuffels, H. L. M., & Van den Bergh, H.(2006). De ene tekst is de andere niet: The language-as-a fixed-effect fallacy revisited: Statistische implicaties. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 28(4), 323-345.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mulder, G.(2016). De kwaliteit van onderzoek. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 38(2), 163-173.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Noar, S. M., Hall, M. G., Francis, D. B., Ribisl, K. M., Pepper, J. K., & Brewer, N. T.(2016). Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tobacco Control, 25, 341-354.
    [Google Scholar]
32. O’Keefe, D. J.(2002). The persuasive effects of variation in standpoint articulation. In F.H.van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 65-82). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
    [Google Scholar]
33. O’Keefe, D. J.(2015). Message generalizations that support evidence-based persuasive message design: Specifying the evidentiary requirements. Health communication, 30(2), 106-113.
    [Google Scholar]
34. O’Keefe, D. J.(2017). Misunderstandings of effect sizes in message effects research. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 210-219.
    [Google Scholar]
35. O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D.(2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 623-644.
    [Google Scholar]
36. O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D.(2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 296-316.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T.(1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York, NY: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Pham, M. T., Geuens, M., & De Pelsmacker, P.(2013). The influence of ad-evoked feelings on brand evaluations: Empirical generalizations from consumer responses to more than 1000 TV commercials. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(4), 383-394.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Raju, S., Unnava, H. R., & Montgomery, N. V.(2009). The moderating effect of brand commitment on the evaluation of competitive brands. Journal of Advertising, 38(2), 21-36.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sheeran, P.(2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1-36.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sheeran, P., Maki, A., Montanaro, E., Avishai-Yitshak, A., Bryan, A., Klein, W. M., Miles, E., & Rothman, A. J.(2016). The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 35(11), 1178-1188.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Shen, F., Sheer, V. C., & Li, R.(2015). Impact of narratives on persuasion in health communication: A meta-analysis. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 105-113.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P.(2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382-419.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Steinmetz, H., Knappstein, M., Ajzen, I., Schmidt, P., & Kabst, R.(2016). How effective are behavior change interventions based on the theory of planned behavior? A three-level meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224(3), 216-233.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Albarracín, D.(2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological bulletin, 141(6), 1178-1204.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Tormala, Z.L, Briñol, P., & Petty, R.E.(2006). When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 684-691.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P.(2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249-268.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Weerman, A., Hoeken, H., & Hornikx, J. M. A.(2016). Een kritische analyse van de manipulatie van argumentkwaliteit in reclameonderzoek. In D.van de Mieroop, L.Buysse, & R.Coesemans, R.(Red.), De macht van de taal: Taalbeheersingsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen (pp. 309-321). Leuven: Acco.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wirtz, J. G., Sparks, J. V., & Zimbres, T. M.(2018). The effect of exposure to sexual appeals in advertisements on memory, attitude, and purchase intention: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Advertising, 37(2), 168-198.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Xu, Z., & Guo, H.(2018). Advantages of Anticipated Emotions over Anticipatory Emotions and Cognitions in Health Decisions: A Meta-Analysis. Health Communication, 33(5), 519-525.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Zebregs, S., Van den Putte, B., Neijens, P., & De Graaf, A.(2015). The differential impact of statistical and narrative evidence on beliefs, attitude, and intention: A meta-analysis. Health communication, 30(3), 282-289.
    [Google Scholar]