oa Effecten van anti-rookboodschappen bij jongeren

References

1. Burgers, C., & Veldhuis, J.(2013). Tailoring fear appeals to lower-educated adolescents: The influence of modality and type of threat. Information Design Journal, 20(1), 32-46.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cauberge, V., De Pelsmacker, P., Janssens, W., & Dens, N.(2009). Fear, threat and efficacy in threat appeals: Message involvement as a key mediator to message acceptance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41(2), 276-285.
   [Google Scholar]
3. DeCastellarnau, A.(2018). A classification of response scale characteristics that affect data quality: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1523-1559.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Eerland, A., & Van den Bergh, H.(2016). Empirische basis van conclusies: Handvatten voor de empirische taalonderzoeker. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 38(2), 139-146.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A.(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Field, A. P.(2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. (3rd, rev. ed.). London: SAGE.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A.(2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(1), 101-116.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Green, L., & Myerson, J.(2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769-92.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hayes, A. F.(2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hayes, A. F.(2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hertgers, S., & Jansen, C. J. M.(2006). Wel vet, niet cool! De rol van consequentiebetrokkenheid bij de verwerking en het resultaat van fear appeal boodschappen in de obesitasvoorlichting. In B.Hendriks, H.Hoeken & P.J.Schellens (Red.), Studies in taalbeheersing 2 (pp. 85-97). Assen: Van Gorcum.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hoeken, H., Hornikx, J., & Hustinx, L.(2012). Overtuigende teksten: Onderzoek en ontwerp (2e, herz. dr.). Bussum: Coutinho.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kantar TNS(2017). Rapport kennis, norm en gedrag rondom de schadelijkheid van roken en meeroken. Zie https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/roken/documenten/rapporten/2017/05/03/rapport-kennis-norm-en-gedrag-rondom-de-schadelijkheid-van-meeroken
    [Google Scholar]
14. Mollen, S., Engelen, S., Kessels, L. T. E., & Putte, B. van den(2017). Short and sweet: The persuasive effects of message framing and temporal context in antismoking warning labels, Journal of Health Communication, 22(1), 20-28.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Nationaal Expertisecentrum Tabaksontmoediging, Onderdeel van het Trimbos-instituut(2017). Factsheet roken onder volwassenen. Zie https://assets.trimbos.nl/docs/a264fcf9-a3e5-44c2-9ba6-e73cebd5d2ae.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
16. Noar, S. M., Hall, M. G., Francis, D. B., Ribisl, K. M., Pepper, J. K., & Brewer, N. T.(2016). Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tobacco Control, 25(3): 341-54.
    [Google Scholar]
17. O’Keefe, D. J.(2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251-274.
    [Google Scholar]
18. O’Keefe, D. J.(2016). Persuasion: Theory and Research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
19. O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D.(2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 12(7), 623-644.
    [Google Scholar]
20. O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D.(2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59(7), 296-316.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Roken ontmoedigen door nieuwe regels (z.j.). Deel van website van de rijksoverheid onder verantwoordelijkheid van het Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport. Zie https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/roken/roken-ontmoedigen
    [Google Scholar]
22. Smith, K. H., & Stutts, M. A.(2003). Effects of short-term cosmetic versus long-term health fear appeals in anti-smoking advertisements on the smoking behaviour of adolescents. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3(2), 155-177.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Tao, C-C., & Bucy, E. P.(2007). Conceptualizing media stimuli in experimental research: Psychological versus attribute-based definitions. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 397-426.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Volksgezondheidenzorg.info(2018). Website gemaakt door het RIVM in opdracht van het Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport. Zie https://www.volksgezondheidenzorg.info/onderwerp/roken/cijfers-context/huidige-situatie-volwassenen#node-roken-naar-opleiding
    [Google Scholar]
25. Zhao, X., & Peterson, E.(2017). Effects of temporal framing on response to antismoking messages: the mediating role of perceived relevance. Journal of Health Communication, 22(1), 37-44.
    [Google Scholar]