oa “Gewoon gezellig effe een kwartiertje over je boeken praten”: verschillende gespreksactiviteiten in het Mondeling Nederlands op de middelbare school^*

References

1. Auer, P., & Di Luzio, A. (Eds.). (1992). The contextualization of language (Vol. 22). John Benjamins Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Breukelman, M., Gosen, M. N., Koole, T., & van de Pol, J. (2023). The workings of multiple principles in student-teacher interactions: Orientations to both mundane interaction and pedagogical context. Linguistics and Education, 76, 101188.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dera, J. (2019). De praktijk van de leeslijst: een onderzoek naar de inhoud en waardering van literatuurlijsten voor het schoolvak Nederlands op havo en vwo. Stichting Lezen.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dera, J. (2021). How culturally diverse are text selections in Dutch literary education? An analysis of reading tips, teaching packs, and student choices. Journal of Dutch Literature, 13 (1), 49-67.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dera, J. (2024). ‘She doesn’t consider it to be real literature’: Student conceptions of the term ‘literature’ and the notion of literary competence. L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 24.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dera, J., Gubbels, J., Van der Loo, J., & Van Rijt, J. (2023). Vaardig met vakinhoud: Handboek vakdidactiek Nederlands. Coutinho.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Edwards, D. & Fasulo, A. (2006) “To Be Honest”: Sequential Uses of Honesty Phrases in Talk-in-Interaction, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39 (4), 343-376, DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_1
   [Google Scholar]
8. Egbert, M. (1998). Miscommunication in language proficiency interviews of firstyear German students: A comparison with natural conversation. In R.Young & A. W.He (Red.), Talking and Testing. (pp. 147-172). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Heritage, J., & Watson, D. R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 123-162.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in conversation. In: Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Wiley & Sons, 370-394.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Jager, M. & Stommel, W. (2017) The risk of metacommunication to manage interactional trouble in online chat counseling. Linguistik online, 87 (8), 191-212.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jefferson, G. (1983) On exposed and embedded correction. Studium Linguistik, 14 (1), 58-68.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kim, S. H., & Park, I. (2015). Test taker-initiated repairs in an English oral proficiency exam for international teaching assistants. Text & Talk, 35(2), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0036
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kormos, J. (1999). Simulating conversations in oral-proficiency assessment: A conversation analysis of role plays and non-scripted interviews in language exams. Language testing, 16(2), 163-188.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Meestringa, T., Ravesloot, C., Bonset, H. (2012) Handreiking schoolexamen Nederlands havo/vwo. Herziening naar aanleiding van het referentiekader taal, SLO Nationaal Expertisecentrum Leerplanontwikkeling, Enschede
    [Google Scholar]
16. Nicolaas, M., & Vanhooren, S. (2008). Het literatuuronderwijs in Nederland en Vlaanderen: een stand van zaken. Nederlandse Taalunie.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Oberon (2016). Lees- en literatuuronderwijs in havo/vwo. Stichting Lezen.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Potter, J., Hepburn, A. & Edwards, D. (2020) Rethinking attitudes and social psychology – Issues of function, order, and combination in subject-side and object-side assessments in natural settings, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17 (3), 336-356, DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1725952
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sandlund, E., & Sundqvist, P. (2013). Diverging task orientations in L2 oral proficiency tests–a conversation analytic approach to participant understandings of pre-set discussion tasks. Nordic Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1).
    [Google Scholar]
20. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.) (2012). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Skovholt, K., Solem, M. S., Vonen, M. N., Sikveland, R. O. & Stokoe, E. (2021). Asking more than one question in one turn in oral examinations and its impact on examination quality. Journal of Pragmatics, 181, 100-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.020
    [Google Scholar]
23. Speer, S. A. (2019). Reconsidering self-deprecation as a communication practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58 (4), 806-828.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Verboord, M. (2003). Moet de meester dalen of de leerling klimmen? De invloed van literatuuronderwijs en ouders op het lezen van boeken, 1975-2000. Proefschrift Universiteit Utrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Vonen, M. N., Solem, M. S. & Skovholt, K. (2023). Managing students’ insufficient answers in oral examinations. Classroom Discourse, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2022.2079694
    [Google Scholar]
26. Vonen, M. N. (2024) Teachers’ management of students’ incorrect answers in oral examinations. Linguistics and Education, 80, 101266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101266.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Witte, T. (2008). Het oog van de meester: een onderzoek naar de literaire ontwikkeling van havo- en vwo-leerlingen in de tweede fase van het voortgezet onderwijs. Eburon.
    [Google Scholar]