f Meer wetenschap in de politiek

References

1. Alberts, B. e.a. (2013), Standing up for GMO’s. Science, 341: 1320.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Comte, A. (1979 [1844]), Het positieve denken. Meppel etc.: Boom.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dooremalen, H., H.de Regt en M.Schouten (2015 [2007]), Exploring humans: Philosophy of science for the social sciences: A historical introduction. Amsterdam: Boom.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Europese Commissie (2010), A decade of EU-funded GMO research. https://ec.europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/a_decade_of_eu-funded_gmo_research.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
5. Goldman, A. (2001), Experts: which ones should you trust?. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, dl. 63, 1: 85-110.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kitcher, P. (2006), Public knowledge and the difficulties of democracy. Social Research, dl. 73, 4: 1205-1224.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Lakatos, I. (1965), Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: I.Lakatos & A.Musgrave (red.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91-196.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Levelt, W.J.M. (red.) (2012), Falende wetenschap: de frauduleuze onderzoekspraktijken van sociaal-psycholoog Diederik Stapel. Geraadpleegd 29april2016: https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/upload/197af18c-b432-442a-9449-ef04890ed936_eindrapport.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Oerlemans, N. en N.Koffeman (2009), Opinieartikel: Gentech is paard van Troje binnenhalen. Nicolaas G. Pierson Foundation.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Nicolia, A., A.Manzo, F.Veronesi en D.Rosellini (2013), An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Critical reviews in biotechnology, early online: 1-12.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Pielke, R.A. Jr. (2007), The honest broker. Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Popper, K.R. (1997 [1963]), De groei van kennis. Amsterdam: Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Regt, H. de en R.Engelfriet (2006), Verkeerd verbonden! Hoe Nederland verzuimt problemen op te lossen. Eindhoven: Pepijn.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Regt, H. de en H.Dooremalen (2008), Wat een Onzin! Wetenschap en het paranormale. Amsterdam: Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Regt, H. de en H.Dooremalen (2015), Het snapgevoel. Hoe de illusie van begrip ons denken gijzelt. Amsterdam: Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Regt, H. de en H.Dooremalen (2016), Voorbij de zuilen van Hercules. In: F.Bacon, Novum Organum. Amsterdam: Boom, 309-337.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Rabesandratana, T. (2015), European Commission to appoint seven to new high-level science advice panel. DOI: 10.1126/science.aac458.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Wilsdon, J. en R.Doubleday (2015). Future directions for scientific advice in Europe. Cambridge: Centre for Science and Policy.
    [Google Scholar]