oa Image as Data: Automated Content Analysis for Visual Presentations of Political Actors and Events

References

1. Ahler, D. J., Citrin, J., Dougal, M. C., & Lenz, G. S. (2017). Face Value? Experimental Evidence that Candidate Appearance Influences Electoral Choice. Political Behavior, 39 (1), 77–102. http://doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9348-6
   [Google Scholar]
2. Al-Rawi, A. K. (2015, mar). Sectarianism and the Arab Spring: Framing the popular protests in Bahrain. Global Media and Communication, 11 (1), 25–42. Retrieved from http://gmc.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1742766515573550http://doi:10.1177/1742766515573550
   [Google Scholar]
3. Antol, S., Agrawal, A., Lu, J., Mitchell, M., Batra, D., Lawrence Zitnick, C., & Parikh, D. (2015). Vqa: Visual question answering. In International conference on computer vision (pp. 2425–2433).
   [Google Scholar]
4. Atkinson, M. D., Enos, R. D., & Hill, S. J. (2009). Candidate Faces and Election Outcomes: Is the Face–Vote Correlation Caused by Candidate Selection?Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4, 229–249. http://doi:10.1561/100.00008062
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barrett, A. W., & Barrington, L. W. (2005). Is a picture worth a thousand words? newspaper photographs and voter evaluations of political candidates. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10 (4), 98–113.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barry, A. M. S. (1997). Visual Intelligence: Perception, Image, and Manipulation in Visual Communication. SUNY Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bauer, N. M., & Carpinella, C. (2018). Visual information and candidate evaluations: the influence of feminine and masculine images on support for female candidates. Political Research Quarterly, 71 (2), 395–407.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2008). New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse. Political Communication, 25 (4), 345–365. http://doi:10.1080/10584600802426965
   [Google Scholar]
9. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad Is Stronger Than Good. Review of General Psychology, 5 (4), 323–370. http://doi:10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323
   [Google Scholar]
10. Belhumeur, P. N., Hespanha, J. P., & Kriegman, D. J. (1997). Eigenfaces vs. fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 19 (7), 711–720.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action (No. June2013). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Biggs, M. (2016). Size Matters: Quantifying Protest by Counting Participants. Sociological Methods & Research, 1–33. http://doi:10.1177/0049124116629166
    [Google Scholar]
14. Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The Third Age of Political Communication: >Influences and Features. Political Communication, 16 (3), 209–230. http://doi:10.1080/105846099198596
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bonica, A. (2018). Inferring Roll-Call Scores from Campaign Contributions Using Supervised Machine Learning. American Journal of Political Science, 62 (4), 830–848. http://doi:10.1111/ajps.12376
    [Google Scholar]
16. Brader, T., Valentino, N. A., & Suhay, E. (2008). What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52 (4), 959–978. http://doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00353.x
    [Google Scholar]
17. Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency (pp. 77–91).
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cantu, F. (2019). The Fingerprints of Fraud: Evidence From Mexico’s 1988 Presidential Election. American Political Science Review, 113 (3), 710–726. http://doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.34763.49442
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cao, Q., Shen, L., Xie, W., Parkhi, O. M., & Zisserman, A. (2018). Vggface2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and age. In 2018 13th ieee international conference on automatic face & gesture recognition (fg 2018) (pp. 67–74).
    [Google Scholar]
20. Carpinella, C. M., Hehman, E., Freeman, J. B., & Johnson, K. L. (2016). The Gendered Face of Partisan Politics: Consequences of Facial Sex Typicality for Vote Choice. Political Communication, 33 (1), 21–38. http://doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.958260
    [Google Scholar]
21. Carter, E. B., & Carter, B. L. (2019). Propaganda and Protest in Autocracies. Journal of Conflict Resolution.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Casas, A., & Webb Williams, N. (2019). Images That Matter: Online Protests and the Mobilizing Role of Pictures. Political Research Quarterly, 72 (2), 360–375. http://doi:10.2139/ssrn.2832805
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chen, D., Park, K., & Joo, J. (2020). Understanding gender stereotypes and electoral success from visual self-presentations of politicians in social media. In Joint workshop on aesthetic and technical quality assessment of multimedia and media analytics for societal trends (pp. 21–25).
    [Google Scholar]
24. D’Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2000). Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of communication, 50 (4), 133–156.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Delalleau, O., & Bengio, Y. (2011). Shallow vs. deep sum-product networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 666–674).
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dietrich, B. J. (2018). Using Motion Detection to Measure Social Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives. Working Paper. Retrieved from http://www.brycejdietrich.com/files/working{_}papers/Dietrich{_}cspan.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
27. Druckman, J. N., & Parkin, M. (2005). The impact of media bias: How editorial slant affects voters. The Journal of Politics, 67 (4), 1030–1049.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Eldan, R., & Shamir, O. (2016). The power of depth for feedforward neural networks. In Conference on learning theory (pp. 907–940).
    [Google Scholar]
29. Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of trump and clinton in the 2016 us presidential election. European journal of communication, 32 (1), 50–61.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Feinberga, M., Willer, R., & Kovacheff, C. (2017). Extreme Protest Tactics Reduce Popular Support for Social Movements. Working paper, 1–58. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract{_}id=2911177http://doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2769-z.For
    [Google Scholar]
31. Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35 (3), 337–358.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts.Pearson College Division.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Fleming, M. K., & Cottrell, G. W. (1990). Categorization of faces using unsupervised feature extraction. In Ijcnn (pp. 65–70).
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The Mind’s Past. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Geise, S., & Baden, C. (2015). Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory. Communication Theory, 25 (1), 46–69.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers. Econometrica, 78 (1), 35–71. http://doi:10.3982/ECTA7195
    [Google Scholar]
37. Gibson, R., & Zillmann, D. (2000). Reading between the photographs: The influence of incidental pictorial information on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77 (2), 355–366.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gilliam Jr, F. D., & Iyengar, S. (2000). Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 560–573.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Gitlin, T. (1980). The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left, With a New Preface. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Grabe, M. E., & Bucy, E. P. (2009). Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Graber, D. A. (1996). Say It with Pictures. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546 (1), 85–96. http://doi:10.1080/08858190209528804
    [Google Scholar]
42. Griffiths, T. L., Jordan, M. I., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Blei, D. M. (2004). Hierarchical topic models and the nested chinese restaurant process. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 17–24).
    [Google Scholar]
43. Grimmer, J. (2010). A bayesian hierarchical topic model for political texts: Measuring expressed agendas in senate press releases. Political Analysis, 18 (1), 1–35.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Groeling, T., Joo, J., Li, W., & Steen, F. (2016). Visualizing presidential elections. In Annual meeting of the american political science association.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., & Ruggieri, S. (2018). A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models. ACM Computing Surveys, 51 (5), 93:1–93:42.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Haim, M., & Jungblut, M. (2020). Politicians’ self-depiction and their news portrayal: Evidence from 28 countries using visual computational analysis. Political Communication, 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hamdy, N., & Gomaa, E. H. (2012, apr). Framing the Egyptian Uprising in Arabic Language Newspapers and Social Media. Journal of Communication, 62 (2), 195–211. http://doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01637.x
    [Google Scholar]
48. Hansen, L. (2015). How images make world politics: International icons and the case of abu ghraib. Review of International Studies, 41 (2), 263–288.
    [Google Scholar]
49. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the ieee conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 770–778).
    [Google Scholar]
50. Hellmeier, S., Weidmann, N. B., & Geelmuyden Rød, E. (2018). In The Spotlight:Analyzing Sequential Attention Effects in Protest Reporting. Political Communication, 00 (00), 1–25. http://doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1452811
    [Google Scholar]
51. Hendricks, L. A., Akata, Z., Rohrbach, M., Donahue, J., Schiele, B., & Darrell, T. (2016). Generating visual explanations. In European conference on computer vision (pp. 3–19).
    [Google Scholar]
52. Hsiang, S. M., Burke, M., & Miguel, E. (2013, sep). Quantifying the influence of climate on human conflict. Science, 341 (6151), 1235367. http://doi:10.1126/science.1235367
    [Google Scholar]
53. Jagenstedt, P. (2008). How much a thousand words are worth. Retrieved 2018-04-15, from https://blog.foolip.org/2008/05/17/how-much-a-thousand-words-are-worth/
    [Google Scholar]
54. Johns, R., & Shephard, M. (2007). Gender, Candidate Image and Electoral Preference. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9 (3), 434–460. http://doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00263.x
    [Google Scholar]
55. Joo, J., Bucy, E., & Seidel, C. (2019). Automated coding of televised leader displays: Detecting nonverbal political behavior with computer vision and deep learning. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4044-4066.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Joo, J., Steen, F. F., & Zhu, S.-C. (2015). Automated facial trait judgment and election outcome prediction: Social dimensions of face. In International conference on computer vision (pp. 3712–3720).
    [Google Scholar]
57. Joo, J., Li, W., Steen, F. F., & Zhu, S. C. (2014). Visual persuasion: Inferring communicative intents of images. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 216–223).
    [Google Scholar]
58. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual review of psychology, 60, 307–337.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Kanade, T. (1977, January). Computer recognition of human faces. Interdisciplinary Systems Research, 47, 1–47.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Kang, Z., Indudhara, C., Mahorker, K., Bucy, E. P., & Joo, J. (2020, August). Understanding political communication styles in televised debates via body movements. In European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 788–793). Springer, Cham.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Kargar, S., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2019). State-aligned trolling in Iran and the double-edged affordances of Instagram. New Media & Society, 1–22. http://doi:10.1177/1461444818825133
    [Google Scholar]
62. Kärkkäinen, K., & Joo, J. (2019). Fairface: Face attribute dataset for balanced race, gender, and age. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.04913.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Ketelaars, P., Walgrave, S., & Wouters, R. (2017). Protesters on message? Explaining demonstrators’ differential degrees of frame alignment. Social Movement Studies, 16 (3), 340–354. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1280387http://doi:10.1080/14742837.2017.1280387
    [Google Scholar]
64. Kiros, R., Salakhutdinov, R., & Zemel, R. (2014). Multimodal neural language models.In International conference on machine learning (pp. 595–603).
    [Google Scholar]
65. Kraidy, U. (2002). Digital Media and Education: cognitive impact of information visualization. Journal of Educational Media, 27 (3), 95–106. http://doi:10.1080/1358165022000081369
    [Google Scholar]
66. Kreiss, D., Lawrence, R. G., & McGregor, S. C. (2019). Political identity-ownership: Symbolic contests to represent members of the public. Working Paper.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 1097–1105).
    [Google Scholar]
68. Lam, O., Wojcik, S., Broderick, B., & Hughes, A. (2018). Gender and Jobs in Online Image Searches (Tech. Rep.). Pew Research Center.
    [Google Scholar]
69. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. nature, 521 (7553), 436–444.
    [Google Scholar]
70. LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989). Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural computation, 1 (4), 541–551.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Lenz, G. S., & Lawsom, C. (2011). Looking the Part: Television Leads Less Informed Citizens to Vote Based on Candidates’ Appearance. American Journal of Political Science, 55 (3), 574–589. http://doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00511.x
    [Google Scholar]
72. Lim, M. (2013, mar). Framing Bouazizi: ’White lies’, hybrid network, and collective/connective action in the 2010-11 Tunisian uprising.Journalism, 14 (7), 921–941. http://doi:10.1177/1464884913478359
    [Google Scholar]
73. Liu, Z., Luo, P., Wang, X., & Tang, X. (2015). Deep learning face attributes in the wild. In International conference on computer vision (pp. 3730–3738).
    [Google Scholar]
74. Livingston, S., & Bennett, W. L. (2003). Gatekeeping, Indexing, and Live-Event News: Is Technology Altering the Construction of News? Gatekeeping , Indexing , and Live-Eve. Political Communication, 20 (4), 363–380. http://doi:10.1080/10584600390244121
    [Google Scholar]
75. Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Mattes, K., & Milazzo, C. (2014). Pretty faces, marginal races: Predicting election outcomes using trait assessments of British parliamentary candidates. Electoral Studies, 34, 177–189. http://doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2013.11.004
    [Google Scholar]
77. McGregor, S. C., Lawrence, R. G., & Cardona, A. (2017). Personalization, gender, and social media: Gubernatorial candidates’ social media strategies. Information, communication & society, 20 (2), 264–283.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Moore, W. H. (1995, jun). Rational Rebels: Overcoming the Free-Rider Problem. Political Research Quarterly, 48 (2), 417–454. http://doi:10.1177/106591299504800211
    [Google Scholar]
79. Myers, D. J., & Caniglia, B. S. (2004). All the Rioting That’s Fit to Print: Selection Effects in National Newspaper Coverage of Civil Disorders, 1968-1969. American Sociological Review, 69, 519–543.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Nulty, P., Theocharis, Y., Popa, S. A., Parnet, O., & Benoit, K. (2016). Social media and political communication in the 2014 elections to the european parliament. Electoral studies, 44, 429–444.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Peng, Y. (2018). Same candidates, different faces: Uncovering media bias in visual portrayals of presidential candidates with computer vision. Journal of Communication, 68 (5), 920–941.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Popkin, S. L. (1994). The Reasoning Voter: Communiation and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Purdy, C. (2018). China is launching a dystopian program to monitor citizens in Beijing. Retrieved 12.20.2018, from https://qz.com/1473966/china-is-starting-a-big-brother-monitoring-program-in-beijing/
    [Google Scholar]
84. Ranjan, R., Patel, V. M., & Chellappa, R. (2017). Hyperface: A deep multi-task learning framework for face detection, landmark localization, pose estimation, and gender recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 41 (1), 121–135.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016). You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the ieee conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 779–788).
    [Google Scholar]
86. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015). Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 91–99).
    [Google Scholar]
87. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., Rand, D. G. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58 (4), 1064–1082.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Rojas, M., Masip, D., Todorov, A., & Vitria, J. (2011). Automatic prediction of facial trait judgments: Appearance vs. structural models. PloS one, 6 (8), e23323.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., … others (2015). Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. International journal of computer vision, 115 (3), 211–252.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Schill, D. (2012). The visual image and the political image: A review of visual communication research in the field of political communication. Review of Communication, 12 (2), 118–142.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Schmuck, D., & Matthes, J. (2017). Effects of Economic and Symbolic Threat Appeals in Right-Wing Populist Advertising on Anti-Immigrant Attitudes: The Impact of Textual and Visual Appeals. Political Communication, 34 (4), 607–626. http://doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1316807
    [Google Scholar]
92. Selvaraju, R. R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., & Batra, D. (2017). Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In Computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 618–626).
    [Google Scholar]
93. Shaban, H. (2018, jun). Amazon employees demand company cut ties with ICE. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/06/22/amazon-employees-demand-company-cut-ties-with-ice
    [Google Scholar]
94. Shah, D. V., Hanna, A., Bucy, E. P., Lassen, D. S., Van Thomme, J., Bialik, K., … Pevehouse, J. C. (2016). Dual screening during presidential debates: Political nonverbals and the volume and valence of online expression. American Behavioral Scientist, 60 (14), 1816–1843.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Snow, D. A., Rochford Jr., E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review, 51 (4), 464–481.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Soroka, S., Loewen, P., Fournier, P., & Rubenson, D. (2016). The impact of news photos on support for military action. Political Communication, 33 (4), 563–582.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C. (2018). Twitter as Data. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C.,Chan, A., & JooJ. Forthcoming. “How State and Protest Violence Affect Protest Dynamics”. DOI: 10.1086/715600. Available at: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/715600
    [Google Scholar]
100. Stephan, M. J., & Chenoweth, E. (2008). Why Civil Resistance Works. International Security, 33 (1), 7–7.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H., & Strohmaier, M. (2018). Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on facebook and twitter. Political communication, 35 (1), 50–74.
     [Google Scholar]
102. Stovall, J. G. (1988). Coverage of 1984 presidential campaign. Journalism Quarterly, 65 (2), 443–449.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Sullivan, D. G., & Masters, R. D. (1988). “happy warriors”: Leaders’ facial displays, viewers’ emotions, and political support. American Journal of Political Science, 345–368.
     [Google Scholar]
104. Taigman, Y., Yang, M., Ranzato, M., & Wolf, L. (2014). Deepface: Closing the gap to human-level performance in face verification. In Computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 1701–1708).
     [Google Scholar]
105. Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308 (5728), 1623–1626.
     [Google Scholar]
106. Torres, M. (2018). Give me the full picture: Using computer vision to understand visual frames and political communication. Retrieved from http://qssi.psu.edu/new-faces-papers-2018/
     [Google Scholar]
107. Towner, T. L., & Muñoz, C. L. (2018). Picture perfect? the role of instagram in issue agenda setting during the 2016 presidential primary campaign. Social science computer review, 36 (4), 484–499.
     [Google Scholar]
108. Tukachinsky, R., Mastro, D., & King, A. (2011). Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? The Effect of Race-Related Visual and Verbal Exemplars on Attitudes and Support for Social Policies. Mass Communication and Society, 14 (6), 720–742. http://doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.530385
     [Google Scholar]
109. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2011). Election forecasts with twitter: How 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Social science computer review, 29 (4), 402–418.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Uijlings, J. R., Van De Sande, K. E., Gevers, T., & Smeulders, A. W. (2013). Selective search for object recognition. International journal of computer vision, 104 (2), 154–171.
     [Google Scholar]
111. Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation. Journal of Politics, 73 (1), 156–170. http://doi:10.1017/S0022381610000939
     [Google Scholar]
112. Vernon, R. J., Sutherland, C. A., Young, A. W., & Hartley, T. (2014). Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (32), E3353–E3361.
     [Google Scholar]
113. Viola, P., & Jones, M. J. (2004). Robust real-time face detection. International journal of computer vision, 57 (2), 137–154.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Watts, M. D., Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Fan, D. P. (1999). Elite cues and media bias in presidential campaigns: Explaining public perceptions of a liberal press. Communication Research, 26 (2), 144–175.
     [Google Scholar]
115. Wittebols, J. H. (1996). News from the Noninstitutional world: U.S. and Canadian television news coverage of social protest. Political Communication1, 13 (3), 345–361. http://doi:10.1080/10584609.1996.9963122
     [Google Scholar]
116. Won, D., Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C., & Joo, J. (2017). Protest activity detection and perceived violence estimation from social media images. In Proceedings of the 2017 acm on multimedia conference (pp. 786–794).
     [Google Scholar]
117. Wouters, R., & Walgrave, S. (2017). Demonstrating Power: How Protest Persuades Political Representatives. American Sociological Review, 82 (2), 361–383. http://doi:10.1177/0003122417690325
     [Google Scholar]
118. Xi, N., Ma, D., Liou, M., Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C., Anastasopoulos, J., & Joo, J. (2020). Understanding the political ideology of legislators from social media images. In Proceedings of the international aaai conference on web and social media (Vol. 14, pp. 726–737).
     [Google Scholar]
119. You, Q., Cao, L., Cong, Y., Zhang, X., & Luo, J. (2015). A multifaceted approach to social multimedia-based prediction of elections. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 17 (12), 2271–2280.
     [Google Scholar]
120. Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (2008). Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Social and personality psychology compass, 2 (3), 1497–1517.
     [Google Scholar]
121. Zeiler, M. D., & Fergus, R. (2014). Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In European conference on computer vision (pp. 818–833).
     [Google Scholar]
122. Zhang, H., & Pan, J. (2019). CASM: A Deep-Learning Approach for Identifying Collective Action Events with Text and Image Data from Social Media. Sociological Methodology, 49, 1–48.
     [Google Scholar]
123. Zhang, Q.-s., & Zhu, S.-C. (2018). Visual interpretability for deep learning: a survey. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electrical Engineering, 19 (1), 27–39.
     [Google Scholar]
124. Zhou, B., Lapedriza, A., Khosla, A., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2017). Places: A 10 million image database for scene recognition. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 40 (6), 1452–1464.
     [Google Scholar]
125. Bengio, Yoshua, PatriceSimard and PaoloFrasconi. 1994. “Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult.”IEEE transactions on neural networks5(2):157–166.
     [Google Scholar]
126. Collier, Paul and AnkeHoeffler. 2004. “Greed and grievance in civil war.”Oxford Economic Papers56:563–595.
     [Google Scholar]
127. Eldan, Ronen and OhadShamir. 2016. The power of depth for feedforward neural networks. In Conference on Learning Theory. pp. 907–940.
     [Google Scholar]
128. Gebru, Timnit, JonathanKrause, YilunWang, DuyunChen, JiaDeng, ErezLieberman Aiden and LiFei-Fei. 2017. “Using deep learning and Google Street View to estimate the demographic makeup of neighborhoods across the United States.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114(50):13108–13113.
     [Google Scholar]
129. Glaeser, Edward L, ScottDuke Kominers, MichaelLuca and NikhilNaik. 2018. “Big data and big cities: The promises and limitations of improved measures of urban life.”Economic Inquiry56(1):114–137.
     [Google Scholar]
130. He, Kaiming, XiangyuZhang, ShaoqingRen and JianSun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 770–778.
     [Google Scholar]
131. Hsiang, Solomon M, MarshallBurke and EdwardMiguel. 2013. “Quantifying the influence of climate on human conflict.”Science341(>6151), 1235367.
     [Google Scholar]
132. Hunziker, Philipp, CarlMüller-Crepon and Lars-ErikCederman. 2018. “Roads to Rule, Roads to Rebel: Relational State Capacity and Conflict in Africa.”. URL:http://roads-to-peace.org/PDF/DIIS%20UNOPS%202017%20Roads%20to%20Peace%20report.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
133. Hunziker, Philipp and Lars-ErikCederman. 2017. “No Extraction without Representation: The Ethno-Regional Oil Curse and Secessionist Conflict.”Journal of Peace Research54(3):365–381.
     [Google Scholar]
134. Jensen, Jr and DcCowen. 1999. “Remote sensing of urban suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes.”Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing65(5):611–622.
     [Google Scholar]
135. Kern, Holger Lutz. 2011. “Foreign Media and Protest Diffusion in Authoritarian Regimes: The Case of the 1989 East German Revolution.”Comparative Political Studies44(9):1179–1205.
     [Google Scholar]
136. Krizhevsky, Alex, IlyaSutskever and GeoffreyE Hinton. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems. pp. 1097–1105.
     [Google Scholar]
137. LeCun, Yann, BernhardBoser, JohnS Denker, DonnieHenderson, RichardE Howard, WayneHubbard and LawrenceD Jackel. 1989. “Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition.”Neural computation1(4):541–551.
     [Google Scholar]
138. Odgers, Candice L., AvshalomCaspi, ChristopherJ. Bates, RobertJ. Sampson and TerrieE. Moffitt. 2012. “Systematic social observation of children’s neighborhoods using Google Street View: a reliable and cost-effective method.”The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry53(10):1009–1017.
     [Google Scholar]
139. Poggio, Tomaso, HrushikeshMhaskar, LorenzoRosasco, BrandoMiranda and QianliLiao. 2017. “Why and when can deep-but not shallow-networks avoid the curse of dimensionality: A review.”International Journal of Automation and Computing14(5):503–519.
     [Google Scholar]
140. Premise Data. 2017. “Premise Data.”. URL:www.premise.com
141. Selvaraju, Ramprasaath R, MichaelCogswell, AbhishekDas, RamakrishnaVedantam, DeviParikh and DhruvBatra. 2017. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations From Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 618–626.
     [Google Scholar]
142. Tapiador, Francisco J., SilvaniaAvelar, CarlosTavares-Correa and RainerZah. 2011. “Deriving fine-scale socioeconomic information of urban areas using very high-resolution satellite imagery.”International Journal of Remote Sensing32(21):6437–6456.
     [Google Scholar]
143. Toté, Carolien, DomingosPatricio, HendrikBoogaard, Raymondvan der Wijngaart, ElenaTarnavsky and ChrisFunk. 2015. “Evaluation of satellite rainfall estimates for drought and flood monitoring in Mozambique.”Remote Sensing7(2):1758–1776.
     [Google Scholar]
144. Weidmann, Nils B and SebastianSchutte. 2017. “Using night light emissions for the prediction of local wealth.”Journal of Peace Research54(2):125–140.
     [Google Scholar]
145. Wilson, Jeffrey S, CherylM Kelly, MarioSchootman, ElizabethA Baker, AniruddhaBanerjee, MorganClennin and DouglasK Miller. 2012. “Assessing the built environment using omnidirectional imagery.”American journal of preventive medicine42(2):193–199.
     [Google Scholar]
146. Won, Donghyeon, ZacharyC Steinert-Threlkeld and JungseockJoo. 2017. Protest Activity Detection and Perceived Violence Estimation from Social Media Images. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Multimedia Conference. ACM pp. 786–794.
     [Google Scholar]
147. ZacharyC.Steinert-Threlkeld, Alexander Chan, and JungseockJoo. Forthcoming. “How State and Protest Violence Affect Protest Dynamics”. DOI: 10.1086/715600. Available at: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/715600
     [Google Scholar]
148. Zhang, Han and JenniferPan. 2019. “CASM: A Deep-Learning Approach for Identifying Collective Action Events with Text and Image Data from Social Media.”Sociological Methodology49:1–48.
     [Google Scholar]