Reflecties over de rol van positionaliteit in etnografisch onderzoek naar geweldservaringen in politiewerk | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 29, Issue 1/2
  • ISSN: 1385-1535
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7324

Samenvatting

Abstract

Ethnographers typically immerse themselves in a setting or milieu to understand how people in a specific context give meaning to their world, experiences, and behaviors. Given their immersion in a field, ethnographers engage in a crucial process known as reflexivity. In recent years, reflexivity has evolved to encompass a focus on positionality which can be understood in terms of aspects of the self, such as age, sexuality, race, ethnicity, nationality, as well as multiple social positions that researchers strategically draw upon during fieldwork. Classic male-oriented police ethnographic accounts, however, rarely include a reflection on how researchers’ positionality shaped the research process. Fortunately, a growing number of female policing scholars reflect on how their positionality and gendered power dynamics impacted the course of their research. In this article, I discuss how my positionality affected fieldwork during a long-term multi-site ethnographic study of violent interactions within the Dutch police force. I specifically reflect on three dimensions that impacted the research process: my gender, race/ethnicity, and former profession as a social worker, part of my ‘ethnographic toolkit’. The latter, especially, helped to navigate discomfort, gain access, and build rapport.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/KWA2024.1/2.010.KEES
2024-06-01
2024-07-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2007). A phenomenology of whiteness. Feminist theory, 8(2), 149-168.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ball, K. M. (2021). Object not agent: Reflexivity and violence in police research. Critical Criminology, 29, 237–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Çankaya, S. (2017). The racialization of ethnic minority police officers and researchers: on positionality and (auto)ethnographic fieldwork. European Journal of Policing Studies, 4(4), 119–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Loftus, B. (2007). “Policing the Irrelevant.” In Police Occupational Culture, edited by M.O’Neill, M.Marks, and A.Singh, 181–204. Oxford: Elsevier Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mac Giollabhuí, S., Goold, B., & Loftus, B. (2016). Watching the watchers: conducting ethnographic research on covert police investigation in the United Kingdom. Qualitative Research, 16(6), 630–645.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Newburn, T. (2023). Police ethnography: The classic era. In Routledge International Handbook of Police Ethnography (pp. 13-33). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Reyes, V. (2020). Ethnographic toolkit: Strategic positionality and researchers’ visible and invisible tools in field research. Ethnography, 21(2), 220–240.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/KWA2024.1/2.010.KEES
Loading
Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error