Van vertrouwen naar actie: Een kwantitatief onderzoek naar de relatie tussen politiek vertrouwen, een persoonlijk verantwoordelijkheidsgevoel en politieke participatie onder jongeren

References

1. Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2002). Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2), 137-158.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bäck, M., & Christensen, H.S. (2016). When trust matters – a multilevel analysis of the effect of generalized trust on political participation on 25 European democracies. Journal of Civil Society, 12(2), 178-197.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barnes, S., & Kaase, M.K. (1979). Political action: mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beck, U. (2002). Freedom’s Children. In Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (red.) Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences (pp. 156-171). Londen: Sage Publications
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berman, S. (1997). The real ropes course: The development of social consciousness. esr Journal, 1, 1-18.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (cbs). (z.d.). Jongeren. Geraadpleegd op 10mei2023, van https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/visualisaties/dashboard-bevolking/leeftijd/jongeren
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cojuharenco, I., Cornelissen, G., & Karelaia, N. (2016). Yes I can: Feeling connected to others increases perceived effectiveness and socially responsible behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 75-86.
   [Google Scholar]
8. De Heus, P., Van der Leeden, R., & Gazendam, B. (1999). Toegepaste data-analyse: technieken voor niet-experimenteel onderzoek in de sociale wetenschappen. Utrecht: Lemma Uitgevers.
   [Google Scholar]
9. De Moor, J. (2017). Lifestyle politics and the concept of political participation. Acta Politica, 52, 179-197.
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Moor, J., & Verhaegen, S. (2020). Gateway or getaway? Testing the link between lifestyle politics and other modes of political participation. European Political Science Review, 12, 91-111.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Eldridge, S.M., Ukoumunne, O.C., & Carlin, J.B. (2009). The intra-cluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: A review of definitions. International Statistical Review, 77(3), 378-394.
    [Google Scholar]
12. European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ess eric). (2023). ess10 integrated file, edition 3.0 [Dataset]. Sikt – Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research.
13. Farthing, R. (2010). The politics of youthful antipolitics: representing the ‘issue’ of youth participation in politics. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(2), 181-195.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘Southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17-37.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Field, A. (2005). Intraclass Correlation. In Everitt, B.S., & Howell, D.C. (red.) Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science (pp. 948-954). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using ibm spss Statistics. Londen: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Giugni, M., & Grasso, M. (2022). The study of political participation across research traditions. In Giugni, M. & Grasso, M. (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Participation (pp. 1-22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Grasso, M. (2016). Generations, political participation and social change in Western Europe. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Grasso, M., & Giugni, M. (2022). Intra-generational inequalities in young people’s political participation in Europe: The impact of social class on youth political engagement. Politics, 42(1), 13-38.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Educational, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hammer, T. (2020). Youth unemployment, welfare and political participation: a comparative study of six countries. In AndersenJ.G., & Jensen, P.H. (red.) Changing labour markets, welfare policies and citizenship (pp. 129-148). Bristol: Policy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hart, S. (2009). The ‘problem’ with youth: young people, citizenship and the community. Citizenship Studies, 13(6), 642-657.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hayes, A.F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Henn, M., & Foard, N. (2014). Social differentiation in young people’s political participation: the impact of social and educational factors on youth political engagement in Britain. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(3), 360-380.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131-152.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kaase, M., & Marsh, A. (1979). Political action: A theoretical perspective. In: Barnes, S.H. (red.) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies (pp. 27-56). Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kahne, J., Chi, B., & Middaugh, E. (2006). Building social capital for civic and political engagement: The potential of high-school civic courses. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(2), 387-409.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kiess, J. (2022). Learning by doing: The impact of experiencing democracy in education on political trust and participation. Politics, 42(1), 75-94.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lee, N. (1999). The challenge of childhood: Distributions of childhood’s ambiguity in adult institutions. Childhood, 6(4), 455-474.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lister, R. (2007). Inclusive citizenship: realizing the potential. Citizenship Studies, 11(1), 49-61.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lorenzini, J., & Forno, F. (2022). Political Consumerism and Lifestyle Activism. In Giugni, M., & Grasso, M. (red). The Oxford Handbook of Political Participation (pp. 417-434). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Melo, D.F., & Stockemer, D. (2014). Age and political participation in Germany, France and the UK: A comparative analysis. Comparative European Politics, 12, 33-53.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Michalski, P., Marchlewska, M., Furman, A., Szczepanska, D., Panayiotou, O., Molenda, Z., & Górska, P. (2021). To advise and scrutinize the government? Two types of political knowledge, political trust and unconventional participation. Current Psychology, 1-14.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Neilson, L.A., & Paxton, P. (2010). Social capital and political consumerism: A multilevel analysis. Social Problems, 57(1), 5-24.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Norris, P. (2002). Democratic Phoenix: Agencies, repertoires, and targets of political activism. Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting. Verkregen via url: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pippa-Norris-2/publication/245862430_Democratic_Phoenix_Reinventing_Political_Activism/links/569153d408aee91f69a50816/Democratic-Phoenix-Reinventing-Political-Activism.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
36. Persson, M., & Solevid, M. (2014). Measuring political participation – Testing social desirability bias in a web-survey experiment. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(1), 98-112.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Quintelier, E. (2007). Differences in political participation between young and old people. Contemporary Politics, 13(2), 165-180.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rijksoverheid (z.d.). Jongereninspraak: voor, door en met jongeren. Geraadpleegd op 21april2023, van https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/democratie/jongereninspraak
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rijksoverheid (z.d.). Duurzaam openbaar vervoer. Geraadpleegd op 16januari2024, van https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/openbaar-vervoer/duurzaam-openbaar-vervoer
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schakel, W., & Burgoon, B. (2022). The party road to representation: Unequal responsiveness in party platforms. European Journal of Political Research, 61, 304-325.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sloam, J. (2016). Diversity and voice: The political participation of young people in the European Union. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(3), 521-537.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Snel, E., Custers, G., & Engbersen, G. (2018). Ongelijkheid in de participatiestad: Stadsbuurten en burgerparticipatie. Mens & Maatschappij, 93(1), 31-57.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Soler-i-Martí, R., & Ferrer-Fons, M. (2015). Youth participation in context: the impact of youth transition regimes on political action strategies in Europe. The Sociological Review, 63(2), 92-117.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sommet, N., & Morselli, D. (2017). Keep calm and learn multilevel logistic modeling: A simplified three-step procedure using Stata, R, Mplus and SPSS. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 203-218.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Theocharis, Y., & Van Deth, J.W. (2017). Would you recognize a form of political participation if you saw one? In Theocharis, Y., & Van Deth, J.W. (red.). Political Participation in a Changing World: Conceptual and Empirical Challenges in the study of Citizen Engagement (pp. 1-16). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Torney-Purta, J., Barber, C.H., & RichardsonW.K. (2004). Trust in government-related institutions and political engagement among adolescents in six countries. Acta Politica, 39, 380-406.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Van Deth, J.W. (2014). A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica, 49(3), 349-367.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Van Meerkerk, I. (2019). Top-down versus bottom-up pathways to collaboration between governments and citizens: reflecting on different participation traps. In Kekez, A., Howlett, M., & Mamesh, M. (red.). Collaboration and Public Service Dellivery: Promise and Pitfalls (pp. 149-167). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2013). The social psychology of protest. Current Sociology Review, 61(5-6), 886-905.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Warming, H. (2011). Children’s Participation and Citizenship in a Global Age: Empowerment, Tokenism or Discriminatory Disciplining?Social Work & Society, 9(1), 119-134. Verkregen via url: https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/11/34
    [Google Scholar]
51. Wu, S., Crespi, C.M., & Wong, W.K. (2012). Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials33, 869-880.
    [Google Scholar]