2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publicaties
  3. Mens & Maatschappij
  4. Volume 99, Issue 4
  5. Artikel
Volume 99, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0025-9454
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2816

Samenvatting

Abstract

Policies can have a large impact on the lives of refugees, especially in the first few years after arrival. Prior research has mostly focused on their impact on ‘objective’ factors such as language acquisition or labor market integration. We expand on this by examining the longer-term impact of refugee’s experiences with Dutch institutions and policies on the perceived exclusion of migrants by Dutch society. This study uses three waves of survey data (2017, 2019, 2022) to explore the policy factors that influence perceived exclusion among Syrian refugees in the Netherlands. We aim to offer a more nuanced perspective on the impact of policies, by examining the role of objective aspects, e.g., the time spent in an asylum seeker center, and subjective aspects, e.g., satisfaction with the stay in the center. Our findings indicate that especially subjective factors matter. Those who were more satisfied with their stay in the center perceived less exclusion, and this effect did not decrease over time.

© Wybren Nooitgedagt & Jaco Dagevos
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2024.4.004.NOOI
2024-12-01
2024-12-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakker, L., Dagevos, J., & Engbersen, G. (2014). The importance of resources and security in the socio-economic integration of refugees. A study on the impact of length of stay in asylum accommodation and residence status on socio-economic integration for the four largest refugee groups in the Netherlands. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 15(3), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-013-0296-2
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakker, L., Zwanepol, M., Van der Maas-Vos, G., Kalisvaart, I., & Blom, M. (2020). Evaluatie programma voorbereiding op inburgering. Significant public.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Belabas, W., & Gerrits, L. (2017). Constraints and Facilitators for Successful Integration: How Bureaucratic Contacts Affects Migrants’ Pathways. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(7), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v5i7.2496
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Dagevos, J., De Voogd-Hamelink, M., & Damen, R. (2022). Gevestigd maar niet thuis: Eerste bevindingen uit de Survey integratie migranten. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. https://www.scp.nl/publicaties/publicaties/2022/10/11/gevestigd-maar-niet-thuis.-eerste-bevindingen-uit-de-survey-integratie-migranten-sim2020
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Dagevos, J., & Vermeulen, F. (2024). Is de politiek er voor iedereen? Een onderzoek naar ervaren representatie, institutioneel vertrouwen en politieke participatie bij personen met een migratieachtergrond. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. https://www.scp.nl/publicaties/publicaties/2024/01/25/is-de-politiek-er-voor-iedereen
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Damen, R., Dagevos, J., & Huijnk, W. (2024). Feeling at home? A dynamic analysis of the impact of discrimination, refugee-specific, and participation characteristics on recently arrived refugees’ belonging, 25, 1547-1569. Journal of International Migration and Integration. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-024-01135-y
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Geurts, N. (2022). Puzzling pathways: The integration paradox among migrants in Western Europe [Proefschrift, Radboud Universiteit]. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/246515
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Geurts, N., Lubbers, M., & Spierings, N. (2020). Structural position and relative deprivation among recent migrants: A longitudinal take on the integration paradox. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(9), 1828–1848. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1675499
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Kamerstukken II, 32 824, nr. 378. (2022, 14november). Geraadpleegd op 8januari2024, van https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/oep-199e40ba1dcb85d27a65dbc917dcdea292c1b396/pdf.
  10. Kappelhof, J. (2018). Survey Onderzoek Nieuwe Statushouders in Nederland 2017. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. https://www.scp.nl/binaries/scp/documenten/publicaties/2018/06/01/syriers-in-nederland/Survey+Onderzoek+Nieuwe+Statushouders+in+Nederland+2017.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Little, T. D., Jorgensen, T. D., Lang, K. M., & Moore, E. W. (2014). On the joys of missing data. In Journal of Pediatric Psychology (Vol. 39, Issue 2, pp. 151–162). https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst048
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Maliepaard, M., Negash, S., Dagevos, J., Nooitgedagt, W., Kuijpers, T., & Uiters, E. (2023). Navigeren in een nieuwe samenleving. WODC, EUR, RIVM. https://repository.wodc.nl/bitstream/handle/20.500.12832/3297/3296A-navigeren-in-een-nieuwe-samenleving-volledige-tekst.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Maliepaard, M., Noyon, S., & Schans, D. (2021). Een goed begin is het halve werk? De relatie tussen eerste ervaringen in Nederland en institutioneel vertrouwen en identificatie. In W..Huijnk, J.Dagevos, M.Djundeva, D.Schans, E.Uiters, A.Ruijsbroek, & M.De Mooij (Eds.), Met beleid van start: Over de rol van beleid voor ontwikkelingen in de positie en leefsituatie van Syrische statushouders (pp. 110–127). Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. https://www.scp.nl/publicaties/publicaties/2021/04/08/met-beleid-van-start-over-de-rol-van-beleid-voor-ontwikkelingen-in-de-positie-en-leefsituatie-van-syrische-statushouders
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Nooitgedagt, W. (2023). In- en uitsluiting. In M.Maliepaard, S.Negash, J.Dagevos, T.Kuijpers, E.Uiters, R.van Dijke, & W.Nooitgedagt (Reds.), Navigeren in een nieuwe samenleving (pp. 14–18). Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Datacentrum. https://repository.wodc.nl/handle/20.500.12832/3297
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Noyon, S., & Maliepaard, M. (2021). Vertrouwen in Nederlandse instanties. In J.Dagevos, E.Miltenburg, M.de Mooij, D.Schans, E.Uiters, & A.Wijga (Reds.), Syrische statushouders op weg in Nederland: de ontwikkeling van hun positie en leefsituatie. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. https://digitaal.scp.nl/syrische-statushouders-op-weg-in-nederland/vertrouwen-in-nederlandse-instanties/
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Otmani, I. (2024). Towards a ‘low ambition equilibrium’: Managing refugee aspirations during the integration process in Switzerland. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(4), 854–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2235902
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Röder, A., & Mühlau, P. (2012). Low expectations or different evaluations: What explains immigrants’ high levels of trust in host-country institutions?Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(5), 777–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.667986
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Shaw, S. A., Rodgers, G., Poulin, P., Minor, O., & Allen, A. (2021). Safety among newly resettled refugees in the USA. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 22(3), 1045–1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-020-00786-x
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Steinmann, J. (2018). The paradox of integration: Why do higher educated new immigrants perceive more discrimination in Germany?Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(9), 1377–1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2018.1480359
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Doorn, M., Scheepers, P., & Dagevos, J. (2012). Explaining the integration paradox among small immigrant groups in the Netherlands. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 14(2), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-012-0244-6
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2024.4.004.NOOI
Loading
Je oogst wat je zaait
M&M 99, 345 (2024); https://doi.org/10.5117/MEM2024.4.004.NOOI
/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2024.4.004.NOOI
/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2024.4.004.NOOI
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Keyword(s): longitudinal trends; perceived exclusion; policies; refugees

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error