oa The contribution of prosody to intelligibility, comprehensibility and accentedness in foreign language acquisition

References

1. Alexander, J., P.Wong & A.Bradlow (2005). Lexical tone perception in musicians and non-musicians. In: Proceedings of Interspeech 2005. Lisbon, Portugal.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Altmann, H. (2006). The perception and production of second language stress: a cross-linguistic experimental study. Unpublished PhD dissertation University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anderson-Hsieh, J., R.Johnson & K.Koehler (1992). The Relationship Between Native Speaker Judgments of Non-native Pronunciation and Deviance in Segmentals, Prosody, and Syllable Structure. Language Learning42, 529-555.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Astésano, C. (2016). Prosodic characteristics of Reference French. In: S.Detey, J.Durand, B.Laks & C.Lyche (eds.), Varieties of spoken French: a source book. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 68-85.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bentley, A. (1966). Measures of music abilities. Berkshire: NFER-Nelson Publishing Company.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Besson, M. & F.Faita (1995). Event-related potential (ERP) study of musical expectancy – Comparison of musicians with nonmusicians. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21, 1278-1296.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Boula de Mareüil, P. & Vieru-Dimulescu, B. (2006). The contribution of prosody to the perception of foreign accent. Phonetica63, 247-267.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Caspers, J. (2010). The influence of erroneous stress position and segmental errors on intelligibility, comprehensibility and foreign accent in Dutch as a second language. In: J.van Kampen & RickNouwen (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 17-29.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Caspers, J. & K.Horłoza (2012). Intelligibility of non-natively produced Dutch words: interaction between segmental and suprasegmental errors. Phonetica69, 94-107.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chobert, J. & M.Besson (2013). Musical expertise and second language learning. Brain Sciences3, 923-940.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Christiner, M. & S.M.Reiterer (2015). A Mozart is not a Pavarotti: Singers outperform instrumentalists on foreign accent imitation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience9, 482.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chun, D. M. (2002). Discourse Intonation in L2: From theory and research to practice. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Clark, J. & C.Yallop (1995).An introduction to phonetics and phonology – Second edition. Cambridge: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Coumel, M., M.Christiner & S.M.Reiterer (2019). Second language accent faking ability depends on musical abilities, not on working memory. Frontiers in Psychology10, 257.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cutler, A., R.Wales, N.Cooper & J.Janssen (2007). Dutch listeners’ use of suprasegmental cues to English stress. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, 1913-1916.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cutler, A. (2015). Lexical stress in English pronunciation. In: M.Reed & J. M.Levis (eds.), The Handbook of English Pronunciation. Chichester: Wiley, 106-124.
    [Google Scholar]
19. d’Alessandro, C. (2010). Analyse des différents stimuli auditifs : musique, langage et bruit. In: B.Lechevalier, H.Platel & F.Eustache (eds.), Le cerveau musicien. Bruxelles: De Boeck Supérieur, 33-46.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dankovicová, J., J.House, A.Crooks & K.Jones (2016). The relationship between musical skills, music training, and intonation analysis skills. Language and Speech50, 177-225.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Deen, J., C.Van Veen & L.Schutte (2014). Taalriedels. Amsterdam: Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Degrave, P. (2019). Music in the Foreign Language Classroom: How and Why?Journal of Language Teaching and Research10, 412-420.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Degrave, P. (2020). Music training and the use of songs or rhythm: do they help for lexical stress perception?IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (in press).
    [Google Scholar]
24. Delogu, F., G.Lampis & M.Olivetti Belardinelli (2006). Music-to-language transfer effect: may melodic ability improve learning of tonal languages by native nontonal speakers?Cognitive Processing7, 203-207.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Di Cristo, A. (2013). La prosodie de la parole. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dupoux, E., N.Sebastián-Gallés, E.Navarrete & S.Peperkamp (2008). Persistent stress ‘deafness’: the case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition106, 682-706.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ezquerra, Á. O. (2012). Relación entre la aptitud musical y el grado de comprensibilidad del habla en una segunda lengua: estudio de un grupo de alumnos de español de la escuela secundaria inglesa. Porta Linguarum17, 223-236.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: the role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly39, 399-423.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Fomina, A. (2000). Song Melody Influence on Speech Intonation Memorization. In: C.Woods, G.B.Luck, R.Brochard, S.A.O’Neill & J.A.Sloboda (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Keele: Department of Psychology, CD-ROM.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Francois, C. & D.Schön (2011). Musical expertise boosts implicit learning of both musical and linguistic structures. Cerebral Cortex21, 2357-2365.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Gaser, C. & G.Schlaug (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. Journal of Neuroscience23, 9240-9245.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gordon, E.E. (1989). Advanced Measures of music audiation. Chicago: GIA.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Gosselin, N., I.Peretz, J.Clément & S.D.Bella (2010). Comment le cerveau reconnaît-il la musique? In: B.Lechevalier, H.Platel & F.Eustache (eds.), Le cerveau musicien. Bruxelles: De Boeck Supérieur, 91-122.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gottfried, T. (2007). Music and language learning: Effect of musical training on learning L2 speech contrasts. In: O.Bohn & M.Munro, Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In honor of James Emil Flege. Philadelphia: Benjamins, 221-237.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gottfried, T. L., A.M.Staby & C.J.Ziemer (2004). Musical experience and Mandarin tone discrimination and imitation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America115, 2545-2545.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Graham, C. (1993). Grammarchants: Student Book. New-York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Gralinska-Brawata, A. & P.Rybinska (2017). The relationship between the production of word stress and musical abilities in Polish learners of English. Research in Language15, 265-283.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gussenhoven, C. & A.Chen, A. (red.). (2020). The Oxford Handbook of Language Prosody. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hao, Y.C. (2012). Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers. Journal of Phonetics40, 269-279.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Heuven, V. J. van, J.G.Kruyt & J.W.de Vries (1981). Buitenlandsheid en begrijpelijkheid in het Nederlands van buitenlandse arbeiders, een verkennende studie. Forum der Letteren22, 170-178.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Heuven, V. J. van (2018). Acoustic correlates and perceptual cues of word and sentence stress – Towards a cross-linguistic perspective. In: H.van der Hulst, J.Heinz & R.Goedemans (eds.), The Study of Word Stress and Accent: Theories, methods and data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15-59.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Hiligsmann, P. & S.Heiderscheidt (2000). De accentuering in de tussentaal van Franstalige leerders van het Nederlands. Leuvense Bijdragen89, 117.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hiligsmann, P., L.Rasier (2007). Uitspraakleer Nederlands voor Franstaligen. Waterloo: Plantyn.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Huang, B. H. & S.A.Jun (2011). The Effect of Age on the Acquisition of Second Language Prosody. Language and Speech54, 387-414.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Intartaglia, B., T.White-Schwoch, N.Kraus & D.Schön (2017). Music training enhances the automatic neural processing of foreign speech sounds. Scientific Reports7, 1-7.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Isaacs, T. & P.Trofimovich (2011). Phonological memory, attention control, and musical ability: Effects of individual differences on rater judgments of second language speech. Applied Psycholinguistics32, 113-140.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Jackendoff, R. (2009). Parallels and nonparallels between language and music. Music perception: an interdisciplinary journal26, 195-204.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Jentschke, S. & S.Koelsch (2009). Musical training modulates the development of syntax processing in children. NeuroImage47, 735-744.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Kolinsky, R., H.Cuvelier, V.Goetry, I.Peretz & J.Morais (2009). Music Training Facilitates Lexical Stress Processing. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal26, 235-246.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Kolly, M.-J., P.Boula de Mareüil, A.Leemann & V.Dellwo (2017). Listeners use temporal information to identify French- and English-accented speech. Speech Communication86, 121-134.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Kooij, J. & M.van Oostendorp (2003). Fonologie. Uitnodiging tot de klankleer van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Kraus, N. & B.Chandrasekaran (2010). Music training for the development of auditory skills. Nature Reviews Neuroscience11, 599.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Lee, C.Y. & T.H.Hung (2008). Identification of Mandarin tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America124, 3235-3248.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Li, A. & B.Post (2014). L2 acquisition of prosodic properties of speech rhythm: evidence from L1 Mandarin and German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition36, 223-255.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Maastricht, L. van, T.Zee, E.Krahmer & M.Swerts (2017). L1 perceptions of L2 prosody: The interplay between intonation, rhythm, and speech rate and their contribution to accentedness and comprehensibility. Proceedings of Interspeech 2017, 364-368.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Maastricht, L van., T.Zee, E.Krahmer & M.Swerts (2020). The interplay of prosodic cues in the L2: How intonation, rhythm, and speech rate in speech by Spanish learners of Dutch contribute to L1 Dutch perceptions of accentedness and comprehensibility. Speech Communication, in press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Maess, B., S.Koelsch, T.C.Gunter & A.D.Friederici (2001). Musical syntax is processed in Broca’s area: an MEG study. Nature Neuroscience4, 540-545.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Magne, C., D.Schön & M.Besson (2006). Musician children detect pitch violations in both music and language better than nonmusician children: behavioral and electrophysiological approaches. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience18, 199-211.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Marie, C., F.Delogu, G.Lampis, M.O.Belardinelli & M.Besson (2011). Influence of Musical Expertise on Segmental and Tonal Processing in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience23, 2701-2715.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Marques, C., S.Moreno, S.L.Castro & M.Besson (2007). Musicians detect pitch violation in a foreign language better than nonmusicians: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience19, 1453-1463.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Mishan, F. (2005). Designing authenticity into language learning materials. Bristol: Intellect.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Moreno, S. & G.M.Bidelman (2014). Examining neural plasticity and cognitive benefit through the unique lens of musical training. Hearing Research308, 84-97.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Mosing, M. A., G.Madison, N.L.PedersenF.Ullén (2016). Investigating cognitive transfer within the framework of music practice: genetic pleiotropy rather than causality. Developmental Science19, 504-512.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Munro, M. J. (1995). Nonsegmental Factors In Foreign Accent: Ratings of Filtered Speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition17, 17-34.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Munro, M. J. & T.M.Derwing (2001). Modeling Perceptions of the Accentedness and Comprehensibility of L2 Speech. The Role of Speaking Rate. Studies in second language acquisition23, 451-468.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Pantev, C., R.Oostenveld, A.Engelien, B.Ross, L.E.Roberts & M.Hoke (1998). Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians. Nature392, 811-814.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Pastuszek-LipińskaB. (2008) Musicians Outperform Nonmusicians in Speech Imitation. In: R.Kronland-Martinet, S.Ystad & K.Jensen (eds.), Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval. Sense of Sounds. CMMR 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4969. Berlin: Springer, 56-73.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Patel, A. D., E.Gibson, J.Ratner, M.Besson & P.J.Holcomb (1998). Processing Syntactic Relations in Language and Music: An Event-Related Potential Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience10, 717-733.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Patel, A. D. (2003). Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience6, 674-681.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Patel, A. D. (2003). Rhythm in language and music: parallels and differences. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences999, 140-143.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Patel, A. D. (2010). Music, language, and the brain. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Patel, A. D. (2013). Sharing and Nonsharing of Brain Resources for Language and Music. In: M.Arbib (eds.), Language, music, and the brain: A mysterious relationship. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 329-355.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E. (2002). A typological study of stress ‘deafness’. In: C.Gussenhoven & N.Warner (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 203-240.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Peretz, I. (2006). The nature of music from a biological perspective. Cognition100, 1-32.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Peretz, I. (2009). Music, Language and Modularity Framed in Action. Psychologica Belgica49, 157-175.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Peretz, I., D.Vuvan, M.E.Lagrois & J.L.Armony (2015). Neural overlap in processing music and speech. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences370, 20140090.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Rasier, L. (2006). Prosodie en vreemdetaalverwerving. Accentdistributie in het Frans en het Nederlands als vreemde taal. Unpublished PhD dissertation Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Rasier, L. & P.Hiligsmann (2007). Prosodic transfer from L1 to L2. Theoretical and methodological issues. Cahiers de Linguistique Française28, 41.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Rietveld, A.C.M. & V.J.van Heuven (2016). Algemene Fonetiek (4th edition). Bussum: Coutinho.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Schellenberg, E. G. & I.Peretz (2008). Music, language and cognition: unresolved issues. Trends in Cognitive Sciences12, 45-46.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Schön, D., M.Boyer, S.Moreno, M.Besson, I.Peretz & R.Kolinsky (2008). Songs as an aid for language acquisition. Cognition106, 975-983.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Schön, D., C.Magne & M.Besson (2004). The music of speech: music training facilitates pitch processing in both music and language. Psychophysiology41, 341-349.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Sereno, J., L.Lammers & A.Jongmann (2016). The relative contribution of segments and intonation to the perception of foreign-accented speech. Applied psycholinguistics37, 303-322.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Sluijter, A. M. & V.J.van Heuven (1996). Acoustic correlates of linguistic stress and accent in Dutch and American English. In: A.M.Sluijter & V.J.van Heuven (eds.), Proceedings of the International Congress of Spoken Language Processing. Philadelphia, 630-633.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Thompson, W.F., E.G.Schellenberg & G.Husain (2003). Perceiving prosody in speech. Effects of music lessons. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences999, 530-532.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Tremblay, A. (2009). Phonetic variability and the variable perception of L2 word stress by French Canadian listeners. International Journal of Bilingualism13, 35-62.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Trofimovich, P. & W.Baker (2006). Learning Second Language Suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 Experience on Prosody and Fluency Characteristics of L2 Speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition28, 1-30.
    [Google Scholar]
88. van Els, T. & K.de Bot (1987). The Role of Intonation in Foreign Accent. The Modern Language Journal71, 147-155.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Verboog, M. & L.Ader (2016). Taalraps, een aanstekelijke manier om spreektaal te oefenen. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Wartenburger, I., J.Steinbrink, S.Telkemeyer, M.Friedrich, A.D.Friederici & H.Obrig (2007). The processing of prosody: Evidence of interhemispheric specialization at the age of four. NeuroImage34, 416-425.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Winters, S. & M.G.O’Brien (2013). Perceived accentedness and intelligibility: The relative contributions of F0 and duration. Speech communication55, 486-507.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Wolfe, D. E. & L.K.Noguchi (2009). The use of music with young children to improve sustained attention during a vigilance task in the presence of auditory distractions. Journal of Music Therapy46, 69-82.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Wong, P. C. M., E.Skoe, N.M.Russo, T.Dees & N.Kraus (2007). Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nature neuro- science10, 420-422.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Yu, V. & J.E.Andruski (2010). A cross-language study of perception of lexical stress in English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research39, 323-344.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Zhang, Y., F.Baills & P.Prieto (2020). Hand-clapping to the rhythm of newly learned words improves L2 pronunciation: Evidence from training Chinese adolescents with French words. Language Teaching Research24, 666-689.
    [Google Scholar]