De toekomst van onderzoek naar klankverandering: Een dieper begrip door een bredere blik

References

1. Baker, A., D.Archangeli & J.Mielke (2011). Variability in American English sretraction suggests a solution to the actuation problem. Language Variation and Change23(3), 347-374.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bosma, E. & E.Blom (2019). A code-switching asymmetry in bilingual children: code-switching from Dutch to Frisian requires more cognitive control than code-switching from Frisian to Dutch. International Journal of Bilingualism23(6), 1431-1447.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bosma, E. & L.Pablos (2020). Switching direction modulates the engagement of cognitive control in bilingual reading comprehension: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics55, 100894.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beddor, P.S., A.W.Coetzee, W.Styler, K.B.McGowan & J.E.Boland (2018). The time course of individuals’ perception of coarticulatory information is linked to their production: Implications for sound change. Language94, 931-968.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Eisner, F. & J.M.McQueen (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics67(2), 224-238.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hamann, S. (2009). The learner of a perception grammar as a source of sound change. In: P.Boersma & S.Hamann (red.), Phonology in perception. Berlijn: Mouton de Gruyter, 111-149.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kingma, M.M. (2021). Phonetic aspects of centring diphthongs in Frisian: The case of /iə/ and /ɪə/. Research-Master-scriptie, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ohala, J.J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In: C.S.Masek, R.A.Hendrick & M.F.Miller (red.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 17: Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 178-203.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Pinget, A.C.H. (2015). The actuation of sound change. Proefschrift Universiteit Utrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Stevens, M. & J.Harrington (2014). The individual and the actuation of sound change. Loquens1(1), e003.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Van de Velde, H., A.C.H.Pinget, C.Voeten & D.Demolin (2021). Laboratory Sociolinguistics: a new approach to language variation. In K.Franco, S.De Pascale, L.Rosseel, G.Kristiansen & W.Zhang (red.), Cognitive sociolinguistics revisited. Berlijn: De Gruyter, 557-571.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Van Puyvelde, M., L.Rosseel, E.Zenner & D.Speelman (2023). The role of co-occurrence patterns in the acquisition of sociolinguistic variation: shaping a methodological framework. Paper presented at the 16th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Düsseldorf, Germany.sVoeten, C.C. (2020). The adoption of sound change: Synchronic and diachronic processing of regional variation in Dutch. Proefschrift, Universiteit Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Voeten, C.C. (2021a). How long is ‘a long term’ for sound change? The effect of duration of immersion on the adoption of ongoing sound change. Language Dynamics and Change12(1), 28-77.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Voeten, C.C. (2021b). Individual differences in the adoption of sound change. Language and Speech64(3), 705-741.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Voeten, C.C. (dit nummer). Individuele verschillen in de fonologisering van taalverandering.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Voeten, C.C. & C.C.Levelt (2019). ERP responses to regional accent reflect two distinct processes of perceptual compensation. Frontiers in Neuroscience13, 546.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Weinreich, U., W.Labov & M.Herzog (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Yu, A.C.L. (2013). Individual differences in socio-cognitive processing and the actuation of sound change. In: A.C.L.Yu (red.), Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201-227.
    [Google Scholar]