Marten van der Meulen. Unravelingprescriptivism: Relations between language advice publications and language use in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: LOT, 2022. VIII + 259 blz. ISBN: 978-94-6093-416-2, DOI 10.48273/LOT0632. €38.

References

1. Algeo, John (1991). Sweet are the usages of diversity. Word42, 1–17.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bennis, Hans & FransHinskens (2014). Goed of fout. Nietstandaard inflectie in het hedendaags Standaardnederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde19, 131–184.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Curzan, Anne (2014). Fixing English. Prescriptivism and language history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Labov, William (1982). Building on empirical foundations. In: W.Lehmann & Y.Malkiel (red.), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 17–92.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Milroy, James & LeslieMilroy. (1999). Authority in language: Investigating Standard English (3e ed). London/New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Peters, Pam (2006). English usage: prescription and description. In: B.Arts & A.McMahon (red.) Handbook of English linguistics. Malden: Blackwell, 759–80.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Renkema, Jan (1979). Schrijfwijzer. ’s-Gravenhage: Sdu.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Rutten, Gijsbert (2019). Language planning as nation building. Ideology, policy and implementation in the Netherlands, 1750–1850. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid (2019). Describing prescriptivism: Usage guides and usage problems in British and American English. London/New York:Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Willems, Sanne, CasperAlbers & IonicaSmeets (2020). Variability in the interpretation of probability phrases used in Dutch news articles: A risk for miscommunication. Journal of Science Communication19, 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Zwicky, Arnold (2005). Just between Dr. Language and I. LanguageLog. http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/00238.html.
    [Google Scholar]