2004
Volume 47, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2542-6583
  • E-ISSN: 2590-3268

Samenvatting

Abstract

Adelman of Liège was the first who opposed Berengar of Tours in his views regarding the eucharist. He did so in a letter written at about 1051. Adelman defended a real transition of bread and wine into Christ’s body and blood by referring to the so-called -mystery and by expressing his doubts about the validity of sense perception. Berengar replied explaining the transition as a process of assumption into a higher dignity, and not as a total destruction of the original bread and wine. By stressing the symbolic character of the sacrament he introduced a semiotic interpretation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NTT1993.47.001.SLUI
1993-04-01
2024-10-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NTT1993.47.001.SLUI
Loading
Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error