oa Gender and open science/scholarship

References

1. Albornoz, D., & Chan, L.(2018). Power and inequality in open science discourses. IRIS. Informação, Memória e Tecnologia, 4(1), 70–79.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atchison, A.L.(2017). Negating the gender citation advantage in political science. Political Science & Politics, 50(2), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517000014
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bosman, J., & Kramer, B.(2017). Defining open science definitions.Retrieved from I&M Blog website: https://im2punt0.wordpress.com/2017/03/27/defining-open-science-definitions/
   [Google Scholar]
4. Burchardt, J.(2014). Researchers outside APC-financed open access: Implications for scholars without a paying institution. Sage Open, 4(4), 1–11. https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1177/2158244014551714
   [Google Scholar]
5. cOAlition-S(2019). Principles and implementation. Retrieved from https://www.coalition-s.org/addendum-to-the-coalition-s-guidance-on-the-implementation-of-plan-s/principles-and-implementation/
   [Google Scholar]
6. Czerniewicz, L., & Goodier, S.(2014). Open access in South Africa: A case study and reflections. South African Journal of Science, 110(9–10), 1–9. 10/1590/sajs.2014/20140111
   [Google Scholar]
7. de Jong, S., Icaza, R., Vázquez, R., & Withaeckx, S.(2017). Editorial. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 20(3), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVGN2017.3.JONG
   [Google Scholar]
8. European Commission. (2018). OSPP-REC: Open science policy platform recommendations. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/integrated_advice_opspp_recommendations.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
9. Eve, M.P.(2015). Co-operating for gold open access without APCs. Insights the UKSG Journal, 28(1), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.166
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ford, E.(2013). Defining and characterizing open peer review: A review of the literature. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 44(4), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.44-4-001
    [Google Scholar]
11. GENDERACTION. (2019a). The role of funding agencies in the promotion of gender equality in R&I [Briefing Paper]. Retrieved from genderaction.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/GENDERACTION_PolicyBrief_RFOs-March-8-2019.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
12. GENDERACTION. (2019b). Report on strategic advice for enhancing the gender dimension of Open Science and Innovation Policy. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gould, T.H.P.(2010). Scholar as e-publisher: The future role of [anonymous] peer review within online publishing. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 41(4), 428–448. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.41.4.428
    [Google Scholar]
14. Haring, M.(2017). Open access en het Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies [Internal report]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hedding, D.W.(2020). Comments on ‘Factors affecting global flow of scientific knowledge in environmental sciences’ by Sonne et al. (2020). Science of the Total Environment, 705. https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135933
    [Google Scholar]
16. Murgia, A., & Poggio, B.(2018). Gender and precarious research careers: A comparative analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Piron, F.(2018). Postcolonial open access. In U.Herb & J.Schopfel (Eds.), Open divide: Critical on open access (n.p.). Litwin Books. Retrieved from Université Laval https://corpus.ulaval.ca/jspui/handle/20.500.11794/16178
    [Google Scholar]
18. Raju, R., & Pietersen, J.(2017). Library as publisher: From an African lens. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 20(2). 10.3998/3336451.0020.203
    [Google Scholar]
19. Traynor, C., & Foster, L.(2017). Principles and practice in open science: Addressing power and inequality through ‘situated openness’. Retrieved from Natural Justice.org https://naturaljustice.org/principles-practice-open-science-addressing-power-inequality-situated-openness/
    [Google Scholar]
20. Vicente-Saez, R., & Martinez-Fuentes, C.(2018). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 88, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043
    [Google Scholar]