2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte
  4. Volume 112, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 112, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Abstract

The question if rights can be used in addressing gender-based oppression is at the center of recent debates in feminist theory. On the one hand, post-structuralist critiques have argued that differentiated rights, aimed at redressing injustices, reify the identity of oppressed groups (Brown 2000). On the other hand, proponents of differentiated rights have argued that these should be understood social-phenomenologically, as enabling social agents to counteract their oppression (Young 2011; McNay 2010). This paper argues in favor for the latter position while taking seriously the concern with regard to social identity articulated by the former. I do so by comparing Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault on the relation between resistance and rights. Starting from the observation that Arendt and Foucault agree on the need for a new law that can curtail the destructive dynamics of late-modernity, I argue that their account of resistance ascribes great importance to rights. Discussing the two authors in turn, I focus on two parallel themes. Firstly, confronted with the fight against anti-Semitic persecution (Arendt) and the struggle against governmental techniques (Foucault), they invoke rights against the near-total domination by late-modern states. Secondly, reflecting on how freedom practices require relationships with others in which one can develop one’s individual uniqueness, they hint towards rights that consolidate these relationships, of which friendship is the paradigmatic example. In conclusion, I return to the feminist debate on differential rights to show how Young’s model of communicative democracy is influenced by and is an instance of the relational rights that can be found in Arendt and Foucault.

© 2020 Amsterdam University Press
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2020.2.005.SCHO
2020-07-01
2024-11-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00025275/112/2/06_ANTW2020.2.005.SCHO.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2020.2.005.SCHO&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Allen, A.(2002)Power, Subjectivity, and Agency: Between Arendt and Foucault. International Journal of Philosophical Studies10 (2), pp. 131-49.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arendt, H.(1966)The Origins of Totalitarianism. Derde druk met nieuwe voorwoorden. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arendt, H.(1968)On Humanity in Dark Times: Thoughts about Lessing, in: Men in Dark Times. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, pp. 3-31.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arendt, H.(1984)On Revolution. London: Penguin Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Arendt, H.(1994)‘What Remains? The Language Remains.’: A Conversation with Günter Gaus, in: Essays in Understanding, 1930-1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 1-23.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Arendt, H.(2003)Prologue, in: Responsibility and Judgment. New York: Schocken Books, 3-14.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Arendt, H. (2006a) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Arendt, H. (2006b) What Is Freedom?, in: Between Past and Future: Eighth Exercises in Political Thought. London: Penguin, pp. 142-69.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Arendt, H.(2009)The Jewish Writings. New York: Schocken Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Arendt, H.(2013)The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, W.(1995)States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown, Wendy(2000)“Suffering Rights as Paradoxes”. Constellations7 (2): 208-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00183.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown, W.(2001)Politics Out of History. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Butler, J.(2011)Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge Classics.New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Butler, J.(2015)Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge MA / London: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cooper, D.(2001)Against the Current: Social Pathways and the Pursuit of Enduring Change, Feminist Legal Studies, 9 (2), pp. 119-48.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Disch, L.(1995)On Friendship in ‘Dark Times’, in: B.Honig (red.) Feminist Interpretations of Hannah Arendt. Philadelphia PA: Pennsylvania State university press, pp. 285-311.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dolan, F.M.(2005)The Paradoxical Liberty of Bio-Power: Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault on Modern Politics, Philosophy & Social Criticism31 (3), pp. 369-80.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Foucault, M.(1982) The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry8 (4), pp. 777-95.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Foucault, M. (1994a) De l’amitié comme mode de vie, in: D.Defert (red.) Dits et écrits: 1954-1988. 1980-1988. Parijs: Gallimard, 4: pp.163-67.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Foucault, M. (1994b) Face aux gouvernements, les droits de l’homme, in: D.Defert (red.) Dits et écrits: 1954-1988. 1980-1988. Parijs: Gallimard, 4: pp. 707-8.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Foucault, Michel (1997a) Confronting Governments: Human Rights, in: J.Faubion (red.) Power: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984.Vertaald door Robert Hurley. New York: New Press, pp. 474-75.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Foucault, M. (1997b) Il faut défendre la société: cours au Collège de France (1975-1976). Onder redactie vanMauroBertani en AlessandroFontana. Cours de Michel Foucault au Collège de France.Parijs: Seuil/Gallimard.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Foucault, M. (1997c) The Social Triumph of the Sexual Will, in: P.Rabinow (red.) Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984. New York: New Press, pp. 157-62.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Foucault, M. (1997d) Sex, Power and the Politics of Identity, in: P.Rabinow (red.) Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984. New York: New Press, pp. 163-73.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Foucault, M.(2004)Sécurité, territoire, population: cours au Collège de France, 1977-1978. Parijs: Gallimard.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Foucault, M. (2014a) Histoire de la sexualité (Tome 1) – La volonté de savoir. Parijs: Editions Gallimard.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Foucault, M. (2014b) Histoire de la sexualité (Tome 2) – L’usage des plaisirs. Parijs: Editions Gallimard.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Foucault, M.(2018)Geschiedenis van de seksualiteit. Vertaald door Jeanne Holierhoek. Amsterdam: Boom.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Fraser, N.(1983)Foucault’s Body-Language: A Post-Humanist Political Rhetoric?Salmagundi61, pp. 55-70.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Golder, B.(2015)Foucault and the Politics of Rights. Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Honig, B.(1995)Toward an Agonistic Feminism, in: B.Honig (red.) Feminist Interpretations of Hannah Arendt. Philadelphia PA: Pennsylvania State university press, pp. 135-66.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Loidolt, S.(2017)Phenomenology of Plurality: Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Martín Alcoff, L.(2005)Visible Identities: Race, Gender, and the Self. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. McNay, L.(2010)Feminism and Post-Identity Politics: The Problem of Agency, Constellations17 (4), pp. 512-525.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Oksala, J.(2005)Foucault on Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Taylor, C. (1991)The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Taylor, D.(2011)Countering Modernity: Foucault and Arendt on Race and Racism, Telos154, pp. 119-40.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Williams, P.J.(1991)The Alchemy of Race and Rights. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Young, I.M.(1996)Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy, in: S.Benhabib (red.) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 120-35.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Young, I.M.(2002)Lived Body vs Gender: Reflections on Social Structure and Subjectivity, Ratio15 (4), pp. 410-28.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Young, I.M. (2011a) Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Young, I.M. (2011b) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2020.2.005.SCHO
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): feminism; Hannah Arendt; Iris Marion Young; Michel Foucault; oppression; resistance; rights

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error