2004
Volume 116, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244

Abstract

Abstract

In recent years, increasing attention has been drawn to the environmental impact of AI. Particularly, the development and training of AI systems require significant amounts of energy, water, and raw materials. This raises new ethical questions, such as: when is it (un)justifiable to develop an AI system, considering its environmental impact? This question has been scarcely addressed in the academic literature. To tackle this question, this article draws from the literature on environmental and energy justice. In that field, three categories of justice are distinguished, referring to three elements that can be unjust: the distribution of benefits and burdens (distributive justice), decision-making procedures (procedural justice), and institutionalized social norms (justice as recognition). Based on these distinctions, we outline the criteria for determining the ethical admissibility of AI, given its ecological impact.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2024.4.003.UFFE
2024-11-01
2024-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakiner, O. (2023) What do academics say about artificial intelligence ethics? An overview of the scholarship, AI and Ethics, 3(2), pp. 513-525.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartiaux, F., Day, R., & Lahaye, W. (2021) Energy Poverty as a Restriction of Multiple Capabilities: A Systemic Approach for Belgium, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 0(0), pp. 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartiaux, F., Vandeschrick, C., Moezzi, M., & Frogneux, N. (2018) Energy justice, unequal access to affordable warmth, and capability deprivation: A quantitative analysis for Belgium, Applied Energy, 225(1), pp. 1219–1233.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Belkhir, L., & Elmeligi, A. (2018) Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 & recommendations, Journal of cleaner production, 177, pp. 448-463.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brevini, B. (2021) Is AI good for the planet?. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Celermajer, D., Schlosberg, D., Rickards, L., Stewart-Harawira, M., Thaler, M., Tschakert, P., Verlie, B., & Winter, C. (2021) Multispecies justice: theories, challenges, and a research agenda for environmental politics, Environmental Politics, 30(1–2), pp. 119–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coeckelbergh, M. (2021) Green Leviathan or the Poetics of Political Liberty. Navigating Freedom in the Age of Climate Change and Artificial Intelligence. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Costanza-Chock, S. (2020) Design Justice. Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Crawford, K. (2021) The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cuppen, E., Brunsting, S., Pesch, U., & Feenstra, Y. (2015) How stakeholder interactions can reduce space for moral considerations in decision making: A contested CCS project in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning A, 47(9), pp. 1963–1978.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Falk, S., & van Wynsberghe, A. (2023) Challenging AI for Sustainability: what ought it mean?AI and Ethics, 0123456789.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fraser, N. (2000) Rethinking recognition, New Left Review, 3, pp. 107–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003) Redistribution of recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Honneth, A. (1995) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Latour, B. (2017) Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lauwaert, L. (2021) Wij, robots: een filosofische blik op technologie en artificiële intelligentie. Lannoo Meulenhoff-Belgium.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, P., Jianyi Yang, J., Wierman, Al., Ren, S. (2023) Towards Environmentally Equitable AI via Geographical Load Balancing. E-Energy ’24,June4–7, 2024, Singapore.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mill, J. S. (1859/1998) On liberty, in: J.Gray (red.), On liberty and other essays. Oxford University Press, pp. 1–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mill, E., Garn, W., Ryman-Tubb, N. (2022) Managing Sustainability Tensions in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from Paradox Theory. AIES ‘22: AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 491-489.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Miller, D. (2017) Justice, in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Justice. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/justice/
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pesch, U., Correljé, A., Cuppen, E., & Taebi, B. (2017) Energy justice and controversies: Formal and informal assessment in energy projects. Energy Policy, 109, pp. 825–834.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rakova, B., & Dobbe, R. (2023) Algorithms as Social-Ecological-Technological Systems: an Environmental Justice Lens on Algorithmic Audits, p. 491.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (rev. ed). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schlosberg, D. (2004) Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories, Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517–540.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Schlosberg, D. (2007) Defining environmental justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Tschakert, P., Schlosberg, D., Celermajer, D., Rickards, L., Winter, C., Thaler, M., Stewart-Harawira, M., & Verlie, B. (2021) Multispecies justice: Climate-just futures with, for and beyond humans, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12(2), pp. 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Vesnic-Alujevic, L., & Nacarino, R. C. (2012) The Eu and Its Democratic Deficit: Problems and (Possible) Solutions, European View, 11(1), pp. 63–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Walzer, M. (1983) Spheres of Justice: a Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Basic Books, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wynsberghe, A. Van. (2021) Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI, AI and Ethics, 1, pp. 213–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Young, I. M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2024.4.003.UFFE
Loading
Keyword(s): AI; energy; environment; ethics; justice
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error