oa Who Says What with Whom

References

1. Arora, S., Ge, R., Halpern, Y., Mimno, D., Moitra, A., Sontag, D., … Zhu, M.(2012). A Practical Algorithm for Topic Modeling with Provable Guarantees (ArXiv E-Print No. 1212.4777).
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barberá, P., Wang, N., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J., & González-Bailón, S.(2015). The Critical Periphery in the Growth of Social Protests. PLOS ONE, 10(11), e0143611.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Benigni, M. C., Joseph, K., & Carley, K. M.(2017). Online extremism and the communities that sustain it: Detecting the ISIS supporting community on Twitter. PLOS ONE, 12(12), e0181405.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I.(2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research., 3, 993-1022.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D.(2007). A correlated topic model of science. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 1(1), 17-35.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S.(2011). Analyzing affiliation networks. The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, 1, 417-433.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Breiger, R. L., & Puetz, K.(2015). Culture and networks. The International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 557-62.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Budak, C., & Watts, D. J.(2015). Dissecting the spirit of Gezi: Influence vs. selection in the Occupy Gezi movement. Sociological Science, 2, 370-397.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Castells, M.(2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. John Wiley & Sons.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Conover, M. D., Davis, C., Ferrara, E., McKelvey, K., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A.(2013). The Geospatial Characteristics of a Social Movement Communication Network. PLOS ONE, 8(3), e55957.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M. R., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A.(2011). Political polarization on twitter. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Web and Social Media, 133, 89-96.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dhillon, I. S.(2001). Co-clustering Documents and Words Using Bipartite Spectral Graph Partitioning. Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 269-274.
    [Google Scholar]
13. DiMaggio, P.(2015). Adapting computational text analysis to social science (and vice versa). Big Data & Society, 2(2), 2053951715602908.
    [Google Scholar]
14. DiMaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D.(2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570-606.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Freelon, D., Lopez, L., Clark, M. D., & Jackson, S. J.(2018). How Black Twitter and other social media communities interact with mainstream news. Miami, FL, USA: Knight Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. (2016a). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media & Society, 1461444816676646.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. D., & Clark, M. (2016b). Beyond the hashtags: #Ferguson, #BlackLivesMatter, and the online struggle for offline justice. Center for Media & Social Impact, American University.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gerbaudo, P.(2012). Tweets and the Streets. Pluto PressLondon.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gerlach, M., Peixoto, T. P., & Altmann, E. G.(2018). A network approach to topic models. Science Advances, 4(7), eaaq1360.
    [Google Scholar]
20. González-Bailón, S., & Wang, N.(2016). Networked discontent: The anatomy of protest campaigns in social media. Social Networks, 44, 95-104.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Griffiths, T. L., Jordan, M. I., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Blei, D. M.(2004). Hierarchical topic models and the nested Chinese restaurant process. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 17-24.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A.(1979). Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1), 100-108.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jackson, S.J., Bailey, M. & Foucault Welles, B.(2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B.(2015). Hijacking# myNYPD: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 932-952.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B.(2016). # Ferguson is everywhere: Initiators in emerging counterpublic networks. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 397-418.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Keegan, B., Gergle, D., & Contractor, N.(2011). Hot off the wiki: dynamics, practices, and structures in Wikipedia’s coverage of the Tōhoku catastrophes. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 105-113. ACM.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S.(2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, 591-600.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Levy, O., & Goldberg, Y.(2014). Neural word embedding as implicit matrix factorization. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 2177-2185).
    [Google Scholar]
29. Linder, F.(2017). Improved Data Collection from Online Sources Using Query Expansion and Active Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
30. McDaid, A. F., Greene, D., & Hurley, N.(2011). Normalized mutual information to evaluate overlapping community finding algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1110.2515.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Morstatter, F., & Liu, H.(2017). In search of coherence and consensus: measuring the interpretability of statistical topics. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18(1), 6177-6208.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., Liu, H., & Carley, K. M.(2013). Is the sample good enough? comparing data from twitter’s streaming api with twitter’s firehose. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Web and Social Media.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M.(2012). Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266-282.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., … Rand, D. G.(2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064-1082.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Schmidt, B. M.(2012). Words alone: Dismantling topic models in the humanities. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2(1), 49-65.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Starbird, K., & Palen, L.(2012). (How) will the revolution be retweeted?: information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7-16.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Szell, M., Lambiotte, R., & Thurner, S.(2010). Multirelational organization of large-scale social networks in an online world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(31), 13636-13641.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tufekci, Z.(2014). Big Questions for Social Media Big Data: Representativeness, Validity and Other Methodological Pitfalls. ICWSM ’14: Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tufekci, Z.(2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wallach, H., Mimno, D., & McCallum, A.(2009). Rethinking LDA: Why priors matter. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 22, 1973-1981.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Yang, L., Sun, T., Zhang, M., & Mei, Q.(2012). We know what @you #tag: does the dual role affect hashtag adoption?Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, 261-270.
    [Google Scholar]