oa To Whom Do Politicians Talk and Listen?

References

1. Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A.(2013). National Politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050
   [Google Scholar]
2. Benkler, Y., Roberts, H., Faris, R., Solow-Niederman, A., & Etling, B.(2015). Social Mobilization and the Networked Public Sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA Debate. Political Communication, 32(4), 594–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.986349
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blassnig, S., Ernst, N., Engesser, S., & Esser, F.(2019). Populism and Social Media Popularity. In R.Davis & D.Taras (Eds.), Power Shift? Political Leadership and Social Media (pp. 97–111). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429466007-7
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blassnig, S., & Wirz, D. S.(2019). Populist and Popular: An Experiment on the Drivers of User Reactions to Populist Posts on Facebook. Social Media + Society, 5(4), 205630511989006. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119890062
   [Google Scholar]
5. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. J.(2009). Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data. SIAM Review, 51(4), 661–703. https://doi.org/10.1137/070710111
   [Google Scholar]
6. Crawford, K.(2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum, 23(4), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310903003270
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dahlberg, L.(1998). Cyberspace and the Public Sphere. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 4(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/135485659800400108
   [Google Scholar]
8. Davis, C. A., Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F.(2016). BotOrNot. In J.Bourdeau, J. A.Hendler, R. N.Nkambou, I.Horrocks, & B. Y.Zhao (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web - WWW '16 Companion (pp. 273–274). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2889302
   [Google Scholar]
9. Davis, R., Holtz-Bacha, C., & Just, M. R. (Eds.) (2017). Routledge studies in global information, politics and society: Vol. 11. Twitter and elections around the world: Campaigning in 140 characters or less. New York, London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dobson, A.(2012). Listening: The New Democratic Deficit. Political Studies, 60(4), 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00944.x
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D.(2002). Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society, 31(3), 289–324. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016284431021
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gillespie, C. S.(2015). Fitting Heavy Tailed Distributions: The poweRlaw Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 64(2), 1–16. Retrieved from www.jstatsoft.org/v64/i02/
    [Google Scholar]
13. Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & van 't Haar, G.(2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hargittai, E.(2018). Potential Biases in Big Data. Social Science Computer Review, 43(0), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318788322
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jacobs, K., & Spierings, N.(2019). A populist paradise? Examining populists’ Twitter adoption and use. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1681–1696. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449883
    [Google Scholar]
16. Jarren, O., & Donges, P.(2011). Politische Kommunikation in der Mediengesellschaft: Eine Einführung (3., wesentlich überarb. u. aktualis. Aufl.). Studienbücher zur Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jungherr, A.(2016). Four Functions of Digital Tools in Election Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216642597
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kalsnes, B.(2016). The Social Media Paradox Explained: Comparing Political Parties’ Facebook Strategy Versus Practice. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 205630511664461. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116644616
    [Google Scholar]
19. Karlsen, R., & Enjolras, B.(2016). Styles of Social Media Campaigning and Influence in a Hybrid Political Communication System. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645335
    [Google Scholar]
20. Keller, T. R., & Kleinen-von Königslöw, K. (2018a). Followers, spread the message! Predicting the success of Swiss politicians on Facebook and Twitter. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118765733
    [Google Scholar]
21. Keller, T. R., & Kleinen-von Königslöw, K. (2018b). Followers, Spread the Message!: Predicting the Success of Swiss Politicians on Facebook and Twitter. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118765733
    [Google Scholar]
22. Keller, T. R., & Klinger, U.(2019). Social Bots in Election Campaigns: Theoretical, Empirical, and Methodological Implications. Political Communication, 36(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1526238
    [Google Scholar]
23. Klinger, U., & Svensson, J.(2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241–1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kobayashi, T., & Ichifuji, Y.(2015). Tweets That Matter: Evidence From a Randomized Field Experiment in Japan. Political Communication, 32(4), 574–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.986696
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kriesi, H.(2008). Direct democratic choice: The Swiss experience (1st pbk. ed.). Lanham: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Larsson, A. O.(2017). Going viral? Comparing parties on social media during the 2014 Swedish election. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 23(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515577891
    [Google Scholar]
27. Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H.(2014). Triumph of the Underdogs?: Comparing Twitter Use by Political Actors During Two Norwegian Election Campaigns. SAGE Open, 4(4), 215824401455901. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014559015
    [Google Scholar]
28. Latzer, M., Büchi, M., Festic, N., & Just, N.(2017). Internetanwendungen und deren Nutzung in der Schweiz 2017: Themenbericht aus dem World Internet Project - Switzerland 2017. Retrieved from www.mediachange.ch/media//pdf/publications/Anwendungen_Nutzung_2017.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lee, E.‑J., & Jang, J.‑w.(2013). Not So Imaginary Interpersonal Contact With Public Figures on Social Network Sites. Communication Research, 40(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211431579
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lee, E.‑J., & Shin, S. Y.(2012). Are they talking to me? Cognitive and affective effects of interactivity in politicians' twitter communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(10), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0228
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lee, E.‑J., & Shin, S. Y.(2014). When the Medium Is the Message. Communication Research, 41(8), 1088–1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466407
    [Google Scholar]
32. Levy, D. A. L., Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. K.(2018). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018. Oxford. Retrieved from Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism website: media.digitalnewsreport.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/digital-news-report-2018.pdf?x89475
    [Google Scholar]
33. Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d.(2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
    [Google Scholar]
34. Metag, J., & Rauchfleisch, A.(2017). Journalists’ Use of Political Tweets. Digital Journalism, 5(9), 1155–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1248989
    [Google Scholar]
35. Nielsen, R. K., & Vaccari, C.(2013). Do People “Like” Politicians on Facebook? Not Really. Large-Scale Direct Candidate-to-Voter Online Communication as an Outlier Phenomenon. International Journal of Communication, 7(24), 2333–2356. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1717
    [Google Scholar]
36. Parmelee, J. H.(2014). The agenda-building function of political tweets. New Media & Society, 16(3), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487955
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rauchfleisch, A., & Kaiser, J.(2020). The False Positive Problem of Automatic Bot Detection in Social Science Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3565233
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rauchfleisch, A., & Metag, J.(2016). The special case of Switzerland: Swiss politicians on Twitter. New Media & Society, 18(10), 2413–2431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815586982
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rauchfleisch, A., & Metag, J.(2020). Beyond normalization and equalization on Twitter: Politicians’ Twitter use during non-election times and influences of media attention. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 9(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00021_1
    [Google Scholar]
40. Rheingold, H.(2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier (Revised edition). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rogstad, I.(2016). Is Twitter just rehashing? Intermedia agenda setting between Twitter and mainstream media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160263
    [Google Scholar]
42. Schäfer, M. S.(2015). Digital Public Sphere. In G.Mazzoleni (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (Vol. 15, pp. 1–7). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc087
    [Google Scholar]
43. Spierings, N., Jacobs, K., & Linders, N.(2018). Keeping an Eye on the People. Social Science Computer Review, 089443931876358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318763580
    [Google Scholar]
44. Stromer-Galley, J.(2000). On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02865.x
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tromble, R.(2018). Thanks for (actually) responding! How citizen demand shapes politicians’ interactive practices on Twitter. New Media & Society, 20(2), 676–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816669158
    [Google Scholar]
46. Twitter(2017). Using Deep Learning at Scale in Twitter's Timelines. Retrieved from https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/insights/2017/using-deep-learning-at-scale-in-twitters-timelines.html
    [Google Scholar]
47. Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A.(2015). Follow the leader! Direct and indirect flows of political communication during the 2013 Italian general election campaign. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1025–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813511038
    [Google Scholar]
48. Van Dijck, J.(2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wessler, H.(2008). Investigating Deliberativeness Comparatively. Political Communication, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701807752
    [Google Scholar]
50. Williams, C. B., & Gulati, G. J. ‘J.’(2013). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the congressional elections of 2006 and 2008. New Media & Society, 15(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812457332
    [Google Scholar]