Leiderschap en techniek: Een techniekfilosofische benadering over besluitvorming in de toekomst

References

1. Aarts, K., & Wyatt, S. (2018). Big data in wetenschappelijk onderzoek met gegevens over personen. KNAW.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Achterhuis, H., Van Dijk, P., & Tijmes, P. (1992). De maat van de techniek zes filosofen over techniek, Günther Anders, Jacques Ellul, Arnold Gehlen, Martin Heidegger, Hans Jonas en Lewis Mumford. Ambo.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Achterhuis, H. (Ed.). (2001). American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Indiana University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alasiri, M., & Salameh, A. A. (2020). The impact of business intelligence (BI) and decision support systems (DSS): Exploratory study. International Journal of Management, 11(5), 948-963. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.11.5.2020.087
   [Google Scholar]
5. Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., & De Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 35, 611-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barry-Jester, A., Casselman, B., & Goldstein, D. (2015). The new science of sentencing: Should prison sentences be based on crimes that haven’t been committed yet. The Marshall Project.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1992). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Binns, R. (2022). Human judgment in algorithmic loops: Individual justice and automated decision-making. Regulation & Governance, 16(1), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12358
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chalfin, A., Danieli, O., Hillis, A., Jelveh, Z., Luca, M., Ludwig, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2016). Productivity and selection of human capital with machine learning. American Economic Review, 106(5), 124-127.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Coeckelbergh, M. (2019). Introduction to philosophy of technology. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. De Mul, J., & Van den Berg, B. (2011). Remote control: Human autonomy in the age of computer-mediated agency. In M.Hildebrandt & A.Rouvroy (Eds.), Law, Human Agency and Autonomic Computing: The Philosophy of Law meets the Philosophy of Technology (pp. 46-64). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ellul, J. (2021). The technological society. Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Februari, M. (2020). Hoe de inzet van data-technologie het karakter en de werking van het recht verandert. Raad voor het Openbaar Bestuur.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Feenberg, A. (2009). What is philosophy of technology? In A.Jones & M. J.de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 159-166). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087908799_016
    [Google Scholar]
15. Floridi, L. (2012). Big data and their epistemological challenge. Philosophy & Technology, 25, 435-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-012-0093-4
    [Google Scholar]
16. Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Floridi, L. (2019). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Foucault, M. (1980). Questions on geography. In C.Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings (pp. 1972-1977). Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Borning, A., & Huldtgren, A. (2013). Value sensitive design and information systems. In N.Doorn, D.Schuurbiers, I.van de Poel, & M.Gorman (Eds.), Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory (Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 16, pp. 348-372). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_4
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gertz, N. (2018). Nihilism and technology. Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gieling, R., & Van den Berg, J. (2023). Kunstmatige intelligentie in 60 minuten. Uitgeverij Haystack.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P. J., & Foot, K. A. (Eds.). (2014). Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gurevich, Y. (2012, January). What is an algorithm? In International conference on current trends in theory and practice of computer science (pp. 31-42). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hackforth, R. (Ed.). (1972). Plato: Phaedrus. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hadwick, D., & Lan, S. (2021). Lessons to be learned from the dutch childcare allowance scandal: A comparative review of algorithmic governance by tax administrations in the Netherlands, France and Germany. World Tax Journal, 13(4), 609-645.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking University lectures. Suny Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Irmak, N. (2012). Software is an abstract artifact. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 86(1), 55-72.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Khandani, A. E., Kim, A. J., & Lo, A. W. (2010). Consumer credit-risk models via machine-learning algorithms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(11), 2767-2787.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kool, L., Timmer, J., Royakkers, L. M. M., & Van Est, Q. C. (2017). Opwaarderen: Borgen van publieke waarden in de digitale samenleving. Rathenau Instituut.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lepri, B., Oliver, N., Letouzé, E., Pentland, A., & Vinck, P. (2018). Fair, transparent, and accountable algorithmic decision-making processes: The premise, the proposed solutions, and the open challenges. Philosophy & Technology, 31(4), 611-627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-0170279-x
    [Google Scholar]
32. Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A., & Moore, D. A. (2019). Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.00
    [Google Scholar]
33. Marx, K. (1996). Das Kapital: A critique of political economy. Eagle. (Origineel werk gepubliceerd in 1867).
    [Google Scholar]
34. Miner, R. C. (2013). Informal leaders. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 10(4), 57-61.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Oswald, M., Grace, J., Urwin, S., & Barnes, G. C. (2018). Algorithmic risk assessment policing models: Lessons from the Durham HART model and ‘Experimental’ proportionality. Information & Communications Technology Law, 27(2), 223-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2018.1458455
    [Google Scholar]
37. Parry, K., Cohen, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). Rise of the machines: A critical consideration of automated leadership decision making in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 41(5), 571-594. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116643442
    [Google Scholar]
38. Pedreschi, D., Giannotti, F., Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., & Turini, F. (2019). Meaningful explanations of black box AI decision systems. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(01), 9780-9784. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019780
    [Google Scholar]
39. Peng, A., Nushi, B., Kiciman, E., Inkpen, K., & Kamar, E. (2022). Investigations of performance and bias in human-AI teamwork in hiring. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36(11), 12089-12097. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21468
    [Google Scholar]
40. Rosenberger, R., & Verbeek, P. P. (2015). A field guide to postphenomenology. In R.Rosenberger & P. P.Verbeek (Eds.), Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human-technology relations (pp. 9-41). Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rousseau, J.-J. (1974). A discourse on the moral effects of the arts and sciences. In H.Peterson (Ed.), Essays in philosophy: From David Hume to George Santayana (pp. 34-65). Pocket Books. (Origineel werk gepubliceerd in 1750).
    [Google Scholar]
42. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564
    [Google Scholar]
43. Scharff, R. C., & Dusek, V. (Eds.). (2013). Philosophy of technology: The technological condition: An anthology. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Currency.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Silva, A. (2016). What is leadership?Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 8(1), 1-5.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Skitka, L. J., Mosier, K. L., & Burdick, M. (1999). Does automation bias decision-making?International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(5), 991-1006. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1999.0252
    [Google Scholar]
47. Smith, M. (2016, June22). In Wisconsin, a backlash against using data to foretell defendants’ futures. The New York Times.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Symons, J., & Alvarado, R. (2022). Epistemic injustice and data science technologies. Synthese, 200(2), 1-26.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Thumma, S. A. (2020). On leadership for “the every judge”. Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, 56, 68-75.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Van den Berg, B. (2010). The situated self: Identity in a world of ambient intelligence. Wolf Legal Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Van den Berg, B., & Keymolen, E. (2013). Techniekfilosofie: Het medium is de maat. Wijsgerig Perspectief, 53(1), 8-17.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Van den Berg, B., & Leenes, R. E. (2013). Abort, retry, fail: Scoping techno-regulation and other techno-effects. Human law and computer law: Comparative perspectives, 67-87.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Van den Besselaar, P. (2000). De dynamiek van technologische ontwikkeling en innovatie. Reflecties op Economie, Technologie en Arbeid, 144-159
    [Google Scholar]
55. Van der Kolk, B., & Kaufmann, W. (2018). Performance measurement, cognitive dissonance, and coping strategies: Exploring individual responses to NPM-inspired output control. Journal of Management Control, 29, 93-113.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Van der Loo, H., & Van Reijen, W. (1990). Paradoxen van modernisering. Coutinho.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Van der Meulen, H. (2020, 26juni). Interview Peter-Paul Verbeek: ‘Technologie is ons noodlot’. Filosofie Magazine.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Verbeek, P. P.(2001a). De daadkracht der dingen. Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Verbeek, P. P. (2001b). Don Ihde: The technological lifeworld. In H. J.Achterhuis (Ed.), American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn (pp. 119-146). Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Verbeek, P. P.(2011a). De grens van de mens: Over techniek, ethiek en de menselijke natuur. Lemniscaat.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Willemsen, H., & De Wind, P. (2015). Woordenboek Filosofie (geheel herziene en aangevulde uitgave). Maklu.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Willson, M. (2019). Algorithms (and the) everyday. In D.Beer (Ed.), The social power of algorithms (pp. 137-150). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics?Daedalus, 121(1), 121-136.
    [Google Scholar]