De nieuwe leider in het hemd gezet? Een kritische reflectie op concept, causaliteit en context van leiderschap

References

1. Andersen, H. C. (1837). De nieuwe kleren van de keizer. https://www.andersenstories.com/nl/andersen_sprookjes/de_nieuwe_kleren_van_de_keizer
   [Google Scholar]
2. Antonakis, J. (2017). On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.006
   [Google Scholar]
3. Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Jacquart, P., & Shamir, B. (2016). Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 293-319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062305
   [Google Scholar]
4. Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086-1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
   [Google Scholar]
5. Antonakis, J., d’Adda, G., Weber, R. A., & Zehnder, C. (2022). “Just words? Just speeches?” On the economic value of charismatic leadership. Management Science, 68(9), 6355-6381. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4219
   [Google Scholar]
6. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
   [Google Scholar]
7. Banks, G. C. (2023). Eight puzzles of leadership science. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(4), 101710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101710
   [Google Scholar]
8. Banks, G. C., Dionne, S. D., Mast, M. S., & Sayama, H. (2022). Leadership in the digital era: A review of who, what, when, where, and why. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(5), 101634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101634
   [Google Scholar]
9. Banks, G.C., McCauley, K.D., Gardner, W.L., & Guler, C.E. (2016). A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(4), 634-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.006
   [Google Scholar]
10. Banks, G. C., Woznyj, H. M., & Mansfield, C. A. (2023). Where is “behavior” in organizational behavior? A call for a revolution in leadership research and beyond. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(6), 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101581
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bastardoz, N., Jacquart, P., & Antonakis, J. (2022). Effect of crises on charisma signaling: A regression discontinuity design. The Leadership Quarterly, 101590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101590
    [Google Scholar]
12. Batistič, S., Černe, M., & Vogel, B. (2017). Just how multi-level is leadership research? A document co-citation analysis 1980-2013 on leadership constructs and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.007
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bauwens, R., Batistič, S., Kilroy, S., & Nijs, S. (2022). New kids on the block? A bibliometric analysis of emerging COVID-19-trends in leadership research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(2), 224-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051821997406
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bauwens, R., Decuypere, A., & Van Engen, M. (2023). Wat heeft de medewerker nodig? Themanummer ‘De nieuwe kleren van de leider (m/v/x): Leiderschap in tijden van digitalisering, globalisering en flexibilisering’ (deel 1). Gedrag & Organisatie, 36(4), 301-307. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2022.4.007.ENGE
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bernile, G., Bhagwat, V., & Rau, P. R. (2017). What doesn’t kill you will only make you more risk-loving: Early-life disasters and CEO behavior. The Journal of Finance, 72(1), 167-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2423044
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bloom, N., Eifert, B., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., & Roberts, J. (2013). Does management matter? Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs044
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bloom, N., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., & Roberts, J. (2020). Do management interventions last? Evidence from India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(2), 198-219. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180369
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bruhn, M., Karlan, D., & Schoar, A. (2018). The impact of consulting services on small and medium enterprises: Evidence from a randomized trial in Mexico. Journal of Political Economy, 126(2), 635-687. https://doi.org/10.1086/696154
    [Google Scholar]
19. Collins, M. D., Dasborough, M. T., Gregg, H. R., Xu, C., Deen, C. M., He, Y., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2023). Traversing the storm: An interdisciplinary review of crisis leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(1), 101661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101661
    [Google Scholar]
20. Decuypere, A. (2023). Aandachtige leidercommunicatie in hybride tijden: Pilottest van een nieuwe training. Gedrag & Organisatie, 36(4), 335-380. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2023.4.003.DECU
    [Google Scholar]
21. DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, E., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fiedler, F. E. (1978). The contingency model and the dynamics of the leadership process. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 59-112). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60005-2
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fischer, T., Dietz, J., & Antonakis, J. (2017). Leadership process models: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1726-1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316682830
    [Google Scholar]
24. Fischer, T., Dietz, J., & Antonakis, J. (2024). A fatal flaw: Positive leadership style research creates causal illusions. The Leadership Quarterly, 101771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101771
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fischer, T., Hambrick, D. C., Sajons, G. B., & Van Quaquebeke, N. (2023). Leadership science beyond questionnaires. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(6), 101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101752
    [Google Scholar]
26. Fischer, T., & Sitkin, S. B. (2023). Leadership styles: A comprehensive assessment and way forward. Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 331-372. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0340
    [Google Scholar]
27. Fowles, J. (1974). On chronocentrism. Futures, 6(1), 65-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(74)90008-1
    [Google Scholar]
28. Garretsen, H., Stoker, J. I., Soudis, D., & Wendt, H. (2022). The pandemic that shocked managers across the world: The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 101630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101630
    [Google Scholar]
29. Garretsen, H., Stoker, J. I., & Weber, R. A. (2020). Economic perspectives on leadership: Concepts, causality, and context in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(3), 101410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101410
    [Google Scholar]
30. Grutterink, H., & Vroemen, M. V. (2023). “Wat als mijn baas denkt dat ik het niet kan?!” Metaperceptie als katalysator voor de relatie tussen transformationeel leiderschap, psychologische empowerment en werktevredenheid. Gedrag & Organisatie, 36(4), 381-408. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2023.4.004.GRUT
    [Google Scholar]
31. Gümüsay, A. A., & Reinecke, J. (2022). Researching for desirable futures: From real utopias to imagining alternatives. Journal of Management Studies, 59(1), 236-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12709
    [Google Scholar]
32. Haslam, S. A., Alvesson, M., & Reicher, S. D. (2024). Zombie leadership: Dead ideas that still walk among us. The Leadership Quarterly, 101770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101770
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hill, A. D., Johnson, S. G., Greco, L. M., O’Boyle, E. H., & Walter, S. L. (2021). Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. Journal of Management, 47(1), 105-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320960533
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hiller, N. J., DeChurch, L. A., Murase, T., & Doty, D. (2011). Searching for outcomes of leadership: A 25-year review. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1137-1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310393520
    [Google Scholar]
35. House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391905
    [Google Scholar]
36. House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis?Journal of Management, 23(3), 409-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063970230030
    [Google Scholar]
37. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386-408. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159208
    [Google Scholar]
38. Johns, G. (2018). Advances in the treatment of context in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104406
    [Google Scholar]
39. Johns, G. (2024). The context deficit in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 35(1), 101755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101755
    [Google Scholar]
40. Judge, T. A. & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kelemen, T. K., Matthews, S. H., & Breevaart, K. (2020). Leading day-to-day: A review of the daily causes and consequences of leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101344
    [Google Scholar]
42. Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22(3), 375-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(78)90023-5
    [Google Scholar]
44. Liden, R. C., & Antonakis, J. (2009). Considering context in psychological leadership research. Human Relations, 62(11), 1587-1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709346374
    [Google Scholar]
45. MacKenzie, S. B. (2003). The dangers of poor construct conceptualization. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3), 323-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003011
    [Google Scholar]
46. Marichal, K. & Segers, J. (2017). De kleren van de leider – 19 inzichten in leiderschap. Pelckmans.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Martin, R., Hughes, D. J., Epitropaki, O., & Thomas, G. (2021). In pursuit of causality in leadership training research: A review and pragmatic recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5), 101375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101375
    [Google Scholar]
48. Nielsen, K., & Cleal, B. (2011). Under which conditions do middle managers exhibit transformational leadership behaviors? – An experience sampling method study on the predictors of transformational leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 344-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.009
    [Google Scholar]
49. Nijs, S., Van Engen, M., Van der Meer, S., Van Gestel, S., & Odstrčilíková, K. (2024). Wanneer inclusieve leiders het verschil (kunnen) maken: Het belang van supplementaire en complementaire team-fit voor ervaren autonomie, verbondenheid en competentie van werknemers. Gedrag & Organisatie, 37(1), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2024.2.002.NIJS
    [Google Scholar]
50. Peters, P., Blomme, R., Coun, M., Abbing-Fokkert, Y., & Nijmeijer, M. (2023). De kracht van empowerend leiderschap voor proactiviteit bij thuiswerken: De rol van zelf-effectiviteit, rolambiguïteit en professionele isolatie. Gedrag & Organisatie, 36(4), 308-334. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2023.4.002.PETE
    [Google Scholar]
51. Porter, L. W., & McLaughlin, G. B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: like the weather?The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 559-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.002
    [Google Scholar]
52. Retkowsky, J., Akkermans, J., Nijs, S., Jansen, P. & Khapova, S. (2024). Stimuleren van duurzame loopbanen voor flexwerkers: Paradoxen en routes naar een wenselijke toekomst vanuit het perspectief van belanghebbenden. Gedrag & Organisatie, 37(1), 191-221. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2024.2.004.RETK
    [Google Scholar]
53. Samimi, M., Cortes, A. F., Anderson, M. H., & Herrmann, P. (2022). What is strategic leadership? Developing a framework for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(3), 101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101353
    [Google Scholar]
54. Schmidt, F. (2010). Detecting and correcting the lies that data tell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369339
    [Google Scholar]
55. Sieweke, J., & Santoni, S. (2020). Natural experiments in leadership research: An introduction, review, and guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101338
    [Google Scholar]
56. Spector, P. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
    [Google Scholar]
57. Spijker, K. M. I. (2024). Leiderschap en techniek: Een techniekfilosofische benadering over besluitvorming in de toekomst. Gedrag & Organisatie, 37(1), 164-190. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2024.2.003.SPIJ
    [Google Scholar]
58. Stahl, G. K., Filatotchev, I., Ireland, R. D., & Miska, C. (2023). Five decades of research on the role of context in management: From universalism toward contingent, multilevel and polycontextual perspectives. Academy of Management Collections, 2(1), 1-18.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Stogdill, R. M., & Shartle, C. L. (1948). Methods for determining patterns of leadership behavior in relation to organization structure and objectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 286-291. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057264
    [Google Scholar]
60. Stoker, J. (2005). Leiderschap in verandering. Gedrag & Organisatie, 18(5), 276-295. https://doi.org/10.5117/2005.018.005.003
    [Google Scholar]
61. Stoker, J., & Garretsen, H. (2022). Goede leiders in onzekere tijden: Lessen voor organisaties en de politiek. Business Contact.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Stoker, J. I., Garretsen, H., & Soudis, D. (2019). Tightening the leash after a threat: A multi-level event study on leadership behavior following the financial crisis. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(2), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.004
    [Google Scholar]
63. Stoker, J. I., Garretsen, H., Soudis, D., & Vriend, T. (2023). A configurational approach to leadership behavior through archetypal analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1022299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1022299
    [Google Scholar]
64. Tur, B., Harstad, J., & Antonakis, J. (2022). Effect of charismatic signaling in social media settings: Evidence from TED and Twitter. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(5), 101476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101476
    [Google Scholar]
65. Van Dierendonck, D., Stam, D., Boersma, P., De Windt, N., & Alkema, J. (2014). Same difference? Exploring the differential mechanisms linking servant leadership and transformational leadership to follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 544-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.014
    [Google Scholar]
66. Van Engen, M., Decuypere, A., & Bauwens, R. (2022). Call for papers voor G&O- themanummer 2023: De nieuwe kleren van de leider (m/v/n-b): Leiderschap in tijden van digitalisering, globalisering en flexibilisering. Gedrag & Organisatie, 35(4), 537-546. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2022.4.007.ENGE
    [Google Scholar]
67. Van Knippenberg, D., & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.759433
    [Google Scholar]
68. Wulff, J. N., Sajons, G. B., Pogrebna, G., Lonati, S., Bastardoz, N., Banks, G. C., & Antonakis, J. (2023). Common methodological mistakes. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(1), 101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101677
    [Google Scholar]