oa Psychotypologie

References

1. ALCS (Association for Low Country Studies). (2006). Lying low: Low countries studies in Great Britain and Ireland in the early twenty-first century. University of Sheffield. Geraadpleegd op 20maart2024, van https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DlfNHgoqgtx0nG2eebNWDHyWt9TCmLux/view
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aronin, L., & Jessner, U. (2015). Understanding current multilingualism: What can the butterfly tell us? In U.Jessner & C.Kramsch (Reds.), The multilingual challenge: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 271-291). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512165-013
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of memory and language, 59(4), 390-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459-484.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2012). The L2 status factor and the declarative/procedural distinction. In J.Cabrelli Amaro, S.Flynn & J.Rothman (Reds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 61-78.) John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.46.06bar
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2021). L1, L2 and L3: Same or different?Second Language Research, 37(3), 459-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320941033
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cenoz, J. (2003a). The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069030070010501
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cenoz, J. (2003b). The role of typology in the organization of the multilingual lexicon. In J.Cenoz, B.Hufeisen & U.Jessner (Reds.), The multilingual lexicon (pp. 103-116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48367-7_8
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2014). Focus on multilingualism as an approach in educational contexts. In A.Blackledge & A.Creese (Reds.), Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy: Educational linguistics (pp. 239-254). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7856-6_13
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2022). Pedagogical translanguaging. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009029384
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cummins, J. (2008). Teaching for transfer: Challenging the two solitudes assumption in bilingual education. In N. H.Hornberger (Red.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 1528-1538). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_116
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cummins, J. (2017). Teaching for transfer in multilingual schools. In O.García, A.Lin & S.May (Reds.), Bilingual and multilingual education: Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 103-115). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02258-1_8
    [Google Scholar]
13. De Schutter, G., Van den Berg, B., Goeman, T., & De Jong, T. (2005). Morfologische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten (MAND) (dl. 1: Meervoudsvorming bij zelfstandig naamwoorden, vorming van verkleinwoorden, geslacht bij zelfstandig naamwoord, bijvoeglijk naamwoord en bezittelijk voornaamwoord). Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Echarti, N., Huntemann, H., Lux, T., & Reichart, E. (2022). Volkshochschul-Statistik: 59. Folge, Berichtsjahr 2020. wbv Media . https://www.die-bonn.de/doks/Volkshochschulstatistik/2022/2022-Volkshochschule-Statistik.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
15. EF (EF Education First Ltd.). (2022). The world’s largest ranking of countries and regions by English skills. Geraadpleegd op 10januari2024, van https://www.ef.com/ca/epi/
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fuster, C. (2024). Lexical transfer as a resource in pedagogical translanguaging. International Journal of Multilingualism, 21(1), 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2022.2048836
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fuster, C., & Neuser, H. (2021). The role of morphological similarity in lexical activation and unintentional transfer. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(6), 1597-1615. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211031308
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gooskens, C., & Heeringa, W. (2004). The position of Frisian in the Germanic language area. In D.Gilbers, M.Schreuder & N.Knevel (Reds.), On the boundaries of phonology and phonetics. (pp. 61-87). University of Groningen.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In J. L.Nicol (Red.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1-22). Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Harbert, W. (2006). The Germanic languages. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755071
    [Google Scholar]
21. Heeringa, W., Golubovic, J., Gooskens, C., Schüppert, A., Swarte, F., & Voigt, S. (2013). Lexical and orthographic distances between Germanic, Romance and Slavic languages and their relationship to geographic distance. In C.Gooskens & R.van Bezooijen (Reds.), Phonetics in Europe: Perception and production (pp. 99-137). Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Heeringa, W., Gooskens, C., & Van Heuven, V. J. (2023). Comparing Germanic, Romance and Slavic: Relationships among linguistic distances. Lingua, 287(103512). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103512
    [Google Scholar]
23. Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595547
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hufeisen, B. (2010). Theoretische Fundierung multiplen Sprachenlernens – Faktorenmodell 2.0. Jahrbuch Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 36, 200-207.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hufeisen, B. (2020). Faktorenmodell: Eine angewandt linguistische Perspektive auf das Mehrsprachenlernen. In I.Gogolin, A.Hansen, S.McMonagle & D.Rauch (Reds.), Handbuch Mehrsprachigkeit und Bildung. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20285-9_10
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hüning, M., Vogl, U., Van der Wouden, T., & Verhagen, A. (2006). Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels: handelingen van de workshop op 30 september en 1 oktober 2005 aan de Freie Universität Berlin. Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935927
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kellerman, E. (1983). Now you see it, nor you don’t. In S.Gass & L.Selinker (Reds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 112-134). Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kellerman, E. (1986). An eye for an eye: Crosslinguistic constraints on the development of the L2 lexicon. In E.Kellerman & M.Sharwood Smith (Reds.), Crosslinguistic Influence in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 35-48). Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kemp, C. (2007). Strategic processing in grammar learning: Do multilinguals use more strategies?International Journal of Multilingualism, 4(4), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.2167/ijm099.0
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 325-343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lenth, R. V. (2023). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (R package version 1.9.0). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
33. Louwerse, H. (2019). Klaar om zaken te doen: neerlandistiek in tijden van brexit. De Lage Landen. Geraadpleegd op 10januari2024, van https://www.de-lage-landen.com/article/klaar-om-zaken-te-doen
    [Google Scholar]
34. Meißner, F.-J. (2004). Transfer und Transferieren. Anleitungen zum Interkomprehensionsunterricht. In H. G.Klein & D.Rutke (Reds.), Neuere Forschungen zur Europäischen Interkomprehension (pp. 39-66). Shaker.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Müller, S. (2023). Germanic syntax: A constraint-based view. Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7733033
    [Google Scholar]
36. Nederlandse Taalunie. (2017). Studentenaantallen buitenlandse neerlandistiek 2017. Geraadpleegd op 10januari2024, van https://taalunie.org/informatie/92/cijfers-neerlandistiek-in-het-buitenland
    [Google Scholar]
37. Nederlandse Taalunie. (2018). Studentenaantallen buitenlandse neerlandistiek 2018. Geraadpleegd op 10januari2024, van https://taalunie.org/informatie/92/cijfers-neerlandistiek-in-het-buitenland
    [Google Scholar]
38. Nederlandse Taalunie. (2020). De leerling aan het woord: Belevingsonderzoek onderwijs Nederlands in de buurtaalregio’s. Geraadpleegd op 10januari2024, van https://taalunie.org/publicaties/192/belevingsonderzoek-de-leerling-aan-het-woord
    [Google Scholar]
39. Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-Linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524537
    [Google Scholar]
40. Otwinowska, A. (2016). Cognate vocabulary in language acquisition and use: Attitudes, awareness, activation. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783094394
    [Google Scholar]
41. Puig-Mayenco, E., Chaouch-Orozco, A., Liu, H., & Martín-Villena, F. (2023). The LexTALE as a measure of L2 global proficiency: A cautionary tale based on a partial replication of Lemhöfer and Broersma (2012). Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 13(3), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22048.pui
    [Google Scholar]
42. R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
43. Rothman, J. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310386439
    [Google Scholar]
44. Rothman, J. (2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891300059X
    [Google Scholar]
45. RUG (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen). (2022). Language requirements per faculty. Geraadpleegd op 10januari2024, van https://www.rug.nl/education/bachelor/international-students/admission-and-application/application-admission-procedure/entry-requirements/language-requirements?lang=en
    [Google Scholar]
46. Van der Slik, F., Van Hout, R., & Schepens, J. (2019). The role of morphological complexity in predicting the learnability of an additional language: The case of La (additional language) Dutch. Second Language Research, 35(1), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317691322
    [Google Scholar]
47. Van Haeringen, C. B. (1956). Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels. Servire.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Verheyen, M., & Collet, T. (2019). The state of Netherlandic Studies in Canada. The Low Countries. Geraadpleegd op 10januari2024, van https://www.the-low-countries.com/article/the-state-of-netherlandic-studies-in-canada
    [Google Scholar]
50. Vismans, R., & Wenzel, V. (2012). Dutch between English and German: Language learners’ perceptions of linguistic distance. In E.Ruigendijk, F.Van de Velde & R.Vismans (Reds.) Germanic sandwich 2010: Dutch between English and German. Special volume of Leuvense bijdragen, 98, 4-26.
    [Google Scholar]