oa The Dutch gender-neutral pronoun die: more accepted for generic than for specific reference

References

1. Bates, Douglas, MartinMächler, BenBolker, and SteveWalker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4.”Journal of Statistical Software67 (1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bodine, Ann. 1975. “Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’.”Language in Society4 (2): 129-146. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4166805.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bradley, Evan D., MaxwellSchmid, and HannahLombardo. 2019. “Personality, Prescriptivism, and Pronouns: Factors Influencing Grammaticality Judgments of Gender-Neutral Language.”English Today35 (4): 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078419000063.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Braun, Virginia, and VictoriaClarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.”Qualitative Research in Psychology3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brouwer, Dédé. 1980. “‘Taal en Sekse’ als Probleem voor de Taalwetenschap.”Wetenschap en Samenleving2: 105–115.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Conrod, Kirby. 2019. ‘Pronouns Raising and Emerging’. University of Washington.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Decock, Sofie, SarahVan Hoof, EllenSoens, and HanneVerhaegen. 2024. “The Comprehensibility and Appreciation of Non-Binary Pronouns in Newspaper Reporting: The Case of Hen and Die in Dutch.”Applied Linguistics45 (2): 330–347. doi:10.1093/applin/amad028.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dierckx, Myrte, JozMotmans, PetraMeier, MyriamDieleman, and CharlottePezeril. 2014. “Beyond the box: attitudemeting m.b.t. seksisme, holebifobie en transfobie: onderzoeksrapport.”Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Foertsch, Julie, and MortonAnn Gernsbacher. 1997. “In Search of Gender Neutrality: Is Singular They a Cognitively Efficient Substitute for Generic He?”Psychological Science8 (2): 106–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00691.x.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Friedrich, Marcus C.G., and ElkeHeise. 2019. “Does the Use of Gender-Fair Language Influence the Comprehensibility of Texts?: An Experiment Using an Authentic Contract Manipulating Single Role Nouns and Pronouns.”Swiss Journal of Psychology78 (1–2): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000223.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gamer, Matthias, JimLemon, and Ian FellowsPuspendra Singh. 2019. “Irr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement.”https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/irr/index.html.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gastil, John. 1990. “Generic Pronouns and Sexist Language: The Oxymoronic Character of Masculine Generics.”Sex Roles23 (11–12): 629–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289252.
    [Google Scholar]
13. GustafssonSendén, Marie, Emma Renström, and AnnaLindqvist. 2021. “Pronouns Beyond the Binary: The Change of Attitudes and Use Over Time.”Gender & Society35 (4): 588–615.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Haeseryn, Walter, KirstenRomijn, GuidoGeerts, and Maarten C.van den Toorn. 1997. “ANS | 5 Het Voornaamwoord (Pronomen).”Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. https://e-ans.ivdnt.org/topics/pid/ans05lingtopic.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hekanaho, Laura. 2020. “Generic and Nonbinary Pronouns. Usage, Acceptability and Attitudes.” PhD diss., University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kenward, Michael, and JamesRoger. 1997, “Small Sample Inference for Fixed Effects from Restricted Maximum Likelihood.”Biometrics53 (3): 983-997. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533558.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kuznetsova, Alexandra, PerB. Brockhoff, and Rune H. B.Christensen. 2017. “lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.”Journal of Statistical Software82 (13). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lombard, Matthew, JenniferSnyder-Duch, and CherylCampanella Bracken. 2002. “Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability.”Human Communication Research28 (4): 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Moulton, Janice, George M.Robinson, and CherinElias. 1978. “Sex Bias in Language Use: ‘Neutral’ Pronouns That Aren’t.”American Psychologist33 (11): 1032–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.33.11.1032.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Noll, Jane, MarkLowry, and JudithBryant. 2018. “Changes Over Time in the Comprehension of He and They as Epicene Pronouns.”Journal of Psycholinguistic Research47 (5): 1057–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9577-4.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Paterson, Laura Louise. 2014. British Pronoun Use, Prescription, and Processing. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137332738.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Redl, Theresa. 2021. “Masculine Generic Pronouns: Investigating the Processing of an Uninteded Gender Cue.” PhD diss., Radboud University Nijmegen.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Renström, Emma A., AnnaLindqvist, and MarieGustafsson Sendén. 2022. “The Multiple Meanings of the Gender-inclusive Pronoun Hen: Predicting Attitudes and Use.”European Journal of Social Psychology52 (1): 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2816.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Romein-Verschoor, Annie. 1975. “Over Taal en Seks, Seksisme en Emancipatie.”De Gids138 (1/2): 3–36.
    [Google Scholar]
25. SAOL. 2015. Svenska Akademiens Ordlista Över Svenska Språket. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Speyer, Lydia Gabriela, and ErikSchleef. 2019. “Processing “Gender-Neutral” Pronouns: A Self-Paced Reading Study of Learners of English.”Applied Linguistics40 (5): 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy022.
    [Google Scholar]
27. ‘Taal En Gender: Verwijswoorden Voor Vrouwen, Mannen En Non-Binaire Personen (Algemeen) – Taaladvies.Net’. n.d. Taaladvies. Accessed 5March2024. https://taaladvies.net/taal-en-gender-verwijswoorden-voor-vrouwen-mannen-en-non-binaire-personen-algemeen/.
28. Van der Molen, Romy. 2023. De Interpretatie van Genderneutrale Pronomina. Master thesis, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. https://arts.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/32957/.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Vanspauwen, Emma. 2023. “Het Genderinclusieve Taalbeleid Bij De Standaard, Het Nieuwsblad, De Morgen, De Zondag, VRT NWS en Knack: Een Kwalitatieve Studie.” Master thesis, Ghent University.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Vergoossen, Hellen Petronella, PhilipPärnamets, EmmaAurora Renström, and MarieGustafsson Sendén. 2020a. “Are New Gender-Neutral Pronouns Difficult to Process in Reading? The Case of Hen in SWEDISH.”Frontiers in Psychology11 (November): 574356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574356.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Vergoossen, Hellen Petronella, Emma AuroraRenström, AnnaLindqvist, and MarieGustafsson Sendén. 2020b. “Four Dimensions of Criticism Against Gender-Fair Language.”Sex Roles83 (5–6): 328–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01108-x.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Verhaegen, Hanne, RebeccaVan Herck, SarahVan Hoof, UteGabriel, PascalGygax, and SofieDecock. Subm. “The effect of Dutch gender-neutral pronouns on perceived text quality: generic reference in employee guidelines.”
    [Google Scholar]
33. Vos, Lette, and TiaNutters. 2022. “Wennen aan “hen”? Of “die”? Een Leesonderzoek naar Non-Binaire Voornaamwoorden in de Nederlandse Vertaling van Girl, Woman, Other.”Filter, Tijdschrift over Vertalen, https://www.tijdschrift-filter.nl/webfilter/dossier/gender-in-vertaling/2022-7/wennen-aan-hen-of-die/#.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Vriesendorp, Hielke. 2024. “Die/diens of hen/hun? Non-binaire Voornaamwoorden in het Nederlands.”Nederlandse Taalkunde29 (2): 255-267. https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2024.2.004.VRIE
    [Google Scholar]
35. Zimman, Lal. 2019. “Trans Self-identification and the Language of Neoliberal Selfhood: Agency, Power, and the Limits of Monologic Discourse.”International Journal of the Sociology of Language256: 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-2016.
    [Google Scholar]