oa “Mijn stoma is een #superstoma”

References

1. Antaki, C. & WiddicombeS.(1992). Identities in Talk. London: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bamberg, M.(2011). Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 3-24.
   [Google Scholar]
3. CBS(2019). Vaker online op zoek naar informatie over gezondheid. Geraadpleegd op https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2019/04/vaker-online-op-zoek-naar-informatie-over-gezondheid
   [Google Scholar]
4. Charteris-Black, J.(2012). Shattering the bell jar: Metaphor, gender, and depression. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(3), 199-216.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chou, W.Y., Hunt, Y.M., Beckjord, E.B., Moser, R.P., & Hesse, B.W.(2009). Social Media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 11(4), e48. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1249.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chou, W.Y., Hunt, Y.M., Folkers, A., & Augustson, E.(2011). Cancer survivorship in the age of YouTube and social media: a narrative analysis. J Med. Internet Res, 13(1), e7. doi:10.2196/jmir.1569.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Douglas, M.(1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dubbeldam, I., J.Sanders, W.Spooren, F.Meijman & M.van den Haak(2018). Motives for Information Behavior of Health Consumers: Patterns More Refined than Traditional Dichotomies. A Study Among Women in a Cervix Treatment Process. Journal for Consumer Health on the Internet22 (2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15398285.2018.1425071
   [Google Scholar]
9. Edwards, D.(2003). Workshop on ‘Psychological Categories as Participants’ Resources. AWIA Symposium. Wageningen: Wageningen UR.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Frohlich, D. O.(2016). The social construction of inflammatory bowel disease using social media technologies. Health Communication, 31(11), 1412-1420.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Frohlich, D. O., & Zmyslinski-Seelig, A. N.(2016). How Uncover Ostomy challenges ostomy stigma, and encourages others to do the same. New Media & Society, 18(2), 220-238.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Giles, D., Stommel, W., Paulus, T., Lester, J., & Reed, D.(2015). Microanalysis of online data: The methodological development of “digital CA”. Discourse, Context & Media, 7, 45-51.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Goffman, E.(2018). Stigma: notities over de omgang met een geschonden identiteit. [Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity]. (E.J.Bijleveld, Vert.). Utrecht: Erven J. Bijleveld.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Goffman, E.(1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Guise, J., Widdicombe, S., & McKinlay, A.(2007). ‘What is it like to have ME?’: The discursive construction of ME in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction. Health, 11(1), 87-108.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Heritage, J., & Clayman, S.(2010). Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities and Institutions. Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Horton-Salway, M.(2001). Narrative identities and the management of personal accountability in talk about ME: A discursive psychology approach to illness narrative. Journal of health psychology, 6(2), 247-259.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Horton-Salway, M., & Davies, A.(2018). ADHD as the Product of Discourse. In: The Discourse of ADHD (pp. 221-252). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hydén, L.(1997). Illness and narrative. Sociology of Health & Illness, 19(1), 48-69.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jaworska, S.(2018). ‘Bad’ mums tell the ‘untellable’: narrative practices and agency in online stories about postnatal depression. Discourse, Context & Media, 25: 25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.11.002
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jefferson, G.(1988). On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418-41.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Keim-Malpass, J., Steeves, R.H. & Kennedy, C.(2014). Internet ethnography: a review of methodological considerations for studying online illness blogs. International Journal of Nursing, 51:1686-1692. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.06.003
    [Google Scholar]
23. Koteyko, N., & Atanasova, D.(2018). Mental health advocacy on Twitter: positioning in depression awareness week tweets. Discourse, Context & Media, 25, 52-59. DOI: 10.10.1016/j.dcm.2018.04.007.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Labov, W. & Waletzky, J.(1967). Narrative analysis. In J.Helm (Ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts (pp 12-44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lamerichs, J., & Te Molder, H.F.M.(2003). Computer-Mediated Communication: From a Cognitive to a Discursive Model. New Media & Society, 5(4):451-473. DOI: 10.1177/146144480354002
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lamerichs, J. & Te Molder, H.F.M.(2011). Reflecting on your own talk: the discursive action method at work. In C.Antaki (Ed.). Applied Conversation Analysis. Intervention and Change in Institutional Talk, pp. 184-206. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lamerichs, J. & Stommel, W.(2018). Online talk about mental health talk (pp. 1-57). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.273
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lamprell, K., & Braithwaite, J.(2016). Patients as story-tellers of healthcare journeys. Journal of Medical Humanities, 42, 207-209.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lea, R.(1999). ‘The shitful body’: Excretion and control. Medische Antropologie, 11(1), 7-18.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lucius-Hoene, G., Breuning, M., & Helfferich, C.(2018). Illness narratives in practice: which questions do we have to face when collecting and using them? In G.Lucius-Hoene, C.Holmberg, & T.Meyer (Eds.), Illness narratives in practice: potentials and challenges of using narratives in health-related contexts, pp.13-26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Paulus, T., Warren, A., & Lester, J. N.(2016). Applying conversation analysis methods to online talk: A literature review. Discourse, context & media, 12, 1-10.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pomerantz, A.(1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human studies, 9(2-3), 219-229.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Potter, J.(2003). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In P. M.Camic, J. E.Rhodes, & L.Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 73-94). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ramirez, M., Altschuler, A., McMullen, C., Grant, M., Hornbrook, M. & Krouse, R.(2014). ‘I didn’t feel like I was a person anymore’: realigning full adult personhood after ostomy surgery. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 28(2), 242-259.
    [Google Scholar]
35. SeminoE., Demjén, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S., & Rayson, P.(2018)Metaphor, Cancer and the End of Life: A Corpus-Based Study. Routledge. New York.
    [Google Scholar]
36. StommelW.(2009). Entering an online support group on eating disorders: a discourse Analysis (Vol. 21). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Stommel, W. & Koole, T.(2010). The online support group as a community: a micro analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies, 2:357-378.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Stommel, W. & Lamerichs, J.(2014). Interaction in online support groups. Advice and beyond. In H.E.Hamilton & W.S.Chou (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of Language and Health Communication, pp. 198-211. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Ziebland, S. U. E., & Wyke, S.(2012). Health and illness in a connected world: How might sharing experiences on the internet affect people's health?The Milbank Quarterly, 90(2), 219-249.
    [Google Scholar]