oa Issueframing als een vorm van equivalence framing

References

1. Blais, A., & St-Vincent, S. L.(2011). Personality traits, political attitudes and the propensity to vote. European Journal of Political Research, 50 (3), 395-417.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., & Steen, G. J.(2017). Recategorizing political frames: A systematic review of metaphorical framing in experiments on political communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41 (2), 181-197.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E.(1984). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. ACR North American Advances.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cedroni, L., & Garzia, D.(2010). Voting Advice applications in Europe. The state of the art. Napoli: Scriptaweb.
   [Google Scholar]
5. De Vreese, C. H.(2004). The effects of frames in political television news on issue interpretation and frame salience. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81 (1), 36-52.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Druckman, J.N.(2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23 (3), 225-256.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Entman, R. M.(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Entman, R. M.(2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57 (1), 163-173.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Garzia, D., & Marschall, S.(2012). Voting Advice Applications under review: The state of research. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5 (3), 203-222.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Groves, R.M., Fowler Jr., F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R.(2009). Survey Methodology (2nd ed.). JohnWiley & Sons: Hoboken, New Jersey
    [Google Scholar]
11. Holleman, B.(1999). Wording effects in survey research using meta-analysis to explain the forbid/allow asymmetry. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 6 (1), 29-40.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., van de Pol, J. & de Vreese, C.(2016). Positive vs. Negative – The Impact of Question Polarity in Voting Advice Applications. PLOS ONE, 11 (10), 1-17.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hooghe, L., Marks, G. & Wilson, C.J.(2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?Comparative Political Studies, 35 (8), 965-989.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., van den Bergh, H., & Sanders, T.(2013). Positive, negative, and bipolar questions: The effect of question polarity on ratings of text readability. Survey Research Methods (7) 3, 181-189.
    [Google Scholar]
15. KamoenN., Van de PolJ., KrouwelA., de VreeseC., & HollemanB.(2019). Issue framing in online voting advice applications: The effect of left-wing and right-wing headers on reported attitudes. PLOS ONE¸14 (2), 1-16.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Krouwel, A., Holleman, B.C., Kamoen, N., van de Pol, J., & De Vreese, C.(2018). De invloed van online stemhulpen. In: K.Peters (ed.). Jaarboek 2018 Vereniging van Griffiers. (pp 19-28).griffiers.nl/files/vvgtest_csshtml_nl/4.%20Effecten%20van%20online%20stemhulpen.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lachat, R.(2008). The impact of party polarization on ideological voting. Electoral Studies (27), 687-698.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J.(1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374-378.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Levin, I.P., Schneider, S.L., & Gaeth, G. J., (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149-188.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lobo, M.C., Vink, M. & Lisi, M.(2010). Mapping the political landscape: A vote advice application in Portugal. In: L.Cedroni and D.Garzia (eds.) Voting Advice Applications in Europe: The State of the Art. Napoli, Italy: Scriptaweb, pp. 143-171.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Louwerse, T., & Rosema, M.(2014). The design effects of voting advice applications: Comparing methods of calculating matches. Acta politica, 49(3), 286-312.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Luskin, R. C.(1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12(4), 331-361.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nelson, T.E., Oxley, Z.M. & Clawson, R.A.(1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19 (3), 221-246.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Prodemos (23 mei 2019). https://prodemos.nl/nieuws/bijna-17-miljoen-gebruikers-voor-stemwijzer/ (laatst geraadpleegd 24 aug 2020).
25. Quené, H., & Van den Bergh, H., 2004. On multilevel modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Communication, 43 (1-2), 103-121.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Quené, H. & Van den Bergh, H., 2008. Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 413-442.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Reif, K., & Schmitt, H.(1980). Nine second‐order national elections – a conceptual framework for the analysis of European Election results. European journal of political research, 8 (1), 3-44.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rugg, D.(1941). Experiments in wording questions: II. Public Opinion Quarterly (5),91-92.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ruusuvirta, O., & Rosema, M.(2009). Do online vote selectors influence electoral participation and the direction of the vote. ECPR general conference(pp.13-12).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S.(2012). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication Theories. New York: Oxford University Press, 1-26.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981/1996). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
32. SnidermanP.M., & TheriaultS.M.(2004). The Structure of Polical Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing. In SarisW. E., & SnidermanP. (eds). Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press. pp. 133-165.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Slothuus, R. & De Vreese, C.(2010). Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects. The Journal of Politics, 72 (3), 630-645.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D.(1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
    [Google Scholar]
35. West, R.(1990). Progressive and Conservative Constitutionalism. Michigan Law Review, 88, 641-721.
    [Google Scholar]