- Home
- A-Z Publications
- NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion
- Previous Issues
- Volume 41, Issue 2, 1987
NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion - Volume 41, Issue 2, 1987
Volume 41, Issue 2, 1987
Language:
Dutch
-
-
Amos 5:13- Een omstreden tekst
More Less*Ik wil graag drs. F. Postma (Amstelveen) en dr. P. B. Dirksen (Leiden) bedanken voor hun opmerkingen bij eerdere versies van dit artikel.
Abstract In this article the view is defended that Am. 5:13 together with Am. 5:12 form a unit, with Am. 5:13 functioning as the conclusion of Am. 5:12. So the maśkīl can be seen as a victim of the injustice of Amos’ days, just as the maśkīl was a victim in the days of Antiochus IV Epifanes as witnessed in Dan. 11:33.35. The verse Am. 5:13 is held to be an authentic part of the message of the prophet Amos.
-
-
-
Figuurstudies
More LessAbstract This article offers an analysis of Bernard’s treatise De gradibus humilitatis et superbiae on the basis of a description of Benedictine monastic life as codified in the Rule. On the one hand the Rule of Benedict sums up the main elements of monastic life, on the other hand, it leaves room for experiments. It is this flexibility which Bernard fully exploits in this treatise. Rearranging monastic and religious images and pla Read More
-
-
-
‘Quaestie Oort’ of ‘Quaestie Tai’?
More LessAbstract Henricus Oort was an internationally respected Hebrew and Biblical scholar, as well as a liberal and enlightened Christian. In 1880 a popular publication on the Talmud led him into a fierce controversy with the Amsterdam rabbi Tobias Tal. The case got much publicity and Tal became famous by his resolute attack on a respected member of the intellectual establishment. Today, however, not the Jewish side of t Read More
-
-
-
The moral status of the embryo:
By Peter ByrneAbstract The aim of this paper is to determine the licitness of research on human embryos by suggesting an answer to the question of their moral status. The paper begins by considering and rejecting various indirect ways of determining the licitness of embryo research or the status of the embryo. These are rejected in favour of tackling directly the question if and when embryos are to be treated as persons. Arguments bas Read More
-
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 79 (2025)
-
Volume 78 (2024)
-
Volume 77 (2023)
-
Volume 76 (2022)
-
Volume 75 (2021)
-
Volume 74 (2020)
-
Volume 73 (2019)
-
Volume 72 (2018)
-
Volume 71 (2017)
-
Volume 70 (2016)
-
Volume 69 (2015)
-
Volume 68 (2014)
-
Volume 67 (2013)
-
Volume 66 (2012)
-
Volume 65 (2011)
-
Volume 64 (2010)
-
Volume 63 (2009)
-
Volume 62 (2008)
-
Volume 61 (2007)
-
Volume 60 (2006)
-
Volume 59 (2005)
-
Volume 58 (2004)
-
Volume 57 (2003)
-
Volume 56 (2002)
-
Volume 55 (2001)
-
Volume 54 (2000)
-
Volume 53 (1999)
-
Volume 52 (1998)
-
Volume 51 (1997)
-
Volume 50 (1996)
-
Volume 49 (1995)
-
Volume 48 (1994)
-
Volume 47 (1993)
-
Volume 46 (1992)
-
Volume 45 (1991)
-
Volume 44 (1990)
-
Volume 43 (1989)
-
Volume 42 (1988)
-
Volume 41 (1987)
-
Volume 40 (1986)
-
Volume 39 (1985)
-
Volume 38 (1984)
-
Volume 37 (1983)
-
Volume 36 (1982)
-
Volume 35 (1981)
-
Volume 34 (1980)
Most Read This Month
Article
content/journals/25426583
Journal
10
5
false
en
