- Home
- A-Z Publications
- NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion
- Previous Issues
- Volume 44, Issue 3, 1990
NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion - Volume 44, Issue 3, 1990
Volume 44, Issue 3, 1990
Language:
Dutch
-
-
De interpretatie van de Atrachasis-mythe, een Babylonische oergeschiedenis
More LessAbstract The publication, in 1969, of ‘Atra-ḫasīs. The Babylonian Story of the Flood’, which made an important Mesopotamian myth on primeval history available for study, started a lively scholarly discussion on the interpretation and ‘message’ of the text. In 1980, R.A. Oden (ZAW 93, 1981, 197-216) drew up a preliminary balance of this discussion, also from the Old Testament point of view. This article, again ten years later, Read More
-
-
-
Ostracon, schrijftafel of boekrol? Jeremia 36, Jesaja 30:8 en twee ostraca uit Saqqara
More Less*Bij dit artikel gaat mijn dank uit naar dr. R.J. Demaree en naar de leden van het werkgezelschap ’t Schrijverke van de RUU voor hun gewaardeerde hulp.
Abstract In this article the question is raised: How were the prophecies now to be found in the Prophetical Books of the Old Testament written down originally and what writing-material was used then? The author draws the attention to two Greek ostraca found near the Sacred Animal Necropolis at North Saqqâra. On these ostraca an Egyptian priest has written down five different versions of a letter containing a prophecy. The tex Read More
-
-
-
Johannes XXII en het conflict over de visio beatifica
More LessAbstract The article discusses the theological context of the discussion started by John XXII in 1331 about the question whether the souls of the saints in heaven are directly admitted to the beatific vision of God or not. It must be noted that John’s opinion in this matter was less extreme than many scholars sofar presumed. It was John’s sincere intention to make a papal decision on this matter, and there is strong evidence that Read More
-
-
-
Schrift en rede, of: Over een vermeende tegenstelling tussen Spinoza en Meyer
More LessAbstract Traditionally Spinoza scholars accept a disagreement between Spinoza’s hermeneutics, proposed, demonstrated and exercised in his TTP (1670) and, on the other hand, the exegetical method, as it was explained and practised by his friend and pupil, Lodewijk Meyer in his Philosophia Sanctae Scripturae Interpres (1666). This opinion, so it is claimed, originates from a misreading of a passage in Spinoza’s letter XLIII as Read More
-
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 79 (2025)
-
Volume 78 (2024)
-
Volume 77 (2023)
-
Volume 76 (2022)
-
Volume 75 (2021)
-
Volume 74 (2020)
-
Volume 73 (2019)
-
Volume 72 (2018)
-
Volume 71 (2017)
-
Volume 70 (2016)
-
Volume 69 (2015)
-
Volume 68 (2014)
-
Volume 67 (2013)
-
Volume 66 (2012)
-
Volume 65 (2011)
-
Volume 64 (2010)
-
Volume 63 (2009)
-
Volume 62 (2008)
-
Volume 61 (2007)
-
Volume 60 (2006)
-
Volume 59 (2005)
-
Volume 58 (2004)
-
Volume 57 (2003)
-
Volume 56 (2002)
-
Volume 55 (2001)
-
Volume 54 (2000)
-
Volume 53 (1999)
-
Volume 52 (1998)
-
Volume 51 (1997)
-
Volume 50 (1996)
-
Volume 49 (1995)
-
Volume 48 (1994)
-
Volume 47 (1993)
-
Volume 46 (1992)
-
Volume 45 (1991)
-
Volume 44 (1990)
-
Volume 43 (1989)
-
Volume 42 (1988)
-
Volume 41 (1987)
-
Volume 40 (1986)
-
Volume 39 (1985)
-
Volume 38 (1984)
-
Volume 37 (1983)
-
Volume 36 (1982)
-
Volume 35 (1981)
-
Volume 34 (1980)
Most Read This Month
Article
content/journals/25426583
Journal
10
5
false
en
