Wittgenstein & het logisch empiricisme. Een gespannen verhouding

References

1. Carnap, R. (1998[1928]) Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Carnap, R. (1931) ‘Die Physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft’. Erkenntnis2, pp. 432-465.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Carnap, R. (1934) Der logische Syntax der Sprache. Wien: Verlag von Julius Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carnap, R. (1936) ‘Von der Erkenntnistheorie zur Wissenschaftslogik’, in: L.Rougier (red.), Actes du Congrès international de philosophie scientifique. Paris: Herman, pp. 36-42.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carnap, R. (1963) ‘Intellectual Autobiography’, in: P.Schlipp (red.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, La Salle, Illinois: Northwestern University, pp. 3-81.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Carnap, R, Neurath, O. en Hahn, H. (2013) [1929] ‘Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Die programmatik des Wiener Kreis’, in: C.Damböck (red.), Der Wiener Kreis: Ausgewählte Texte, Stuttgart: Reklam, pp.7-33.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Carus, A. (2007) Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Damböck, C. (red.) (2022) Rudolf Carnap: Tagebücher, band 2, 1920-1935. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Feigl, H. (1969) ‘The Wiener Kreis in America’, in: Fleming en Bailyn (red.), Intellectual Migration: Europe and America, 1930–1960, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, pp. 630-673.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Friedl, J. (2021) ‘The Vienna Circle’s Relationship with Wittgenstein’, in: T.Uebel en C.Limbeck-Lilienau (red.), The Routledge Handbook to Logical Empiricism, London: Routledge, pp. 279-288.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Friedman, M. (2012) ‘Scientific Philosophy from Helmholtz to Carnap and Quine’, in: R.Creath (red.), Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism, Cham: Springer, pp. 1-13.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Galison, P. (1990) ‘Aufbau/Bauhaus: Logical Positivism and Architectural Modernism’, Critical Inquiry16 (4), pp. 709-752.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hempel, C.G. (1935) ‘On the Logical Positivists’ Theory of Truth’, Analysis2 (4), pp. 49-59.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hempel, C.G. (1969) ‘Logical Positivism and the Social Science’, in: P.Achinstein en F.Barker (red.), The Legacy of Logical Positivism, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 163-195.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Mc Guiness, B.F. (red.) (1967) Friedrich Waismann: Wittgenstein und der Wiener Kreis, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Neurath, O. (1937) ‘Unified Science and its Encyclopedia’, Philosophy of Science4 (2), pp. 265-277.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Reichenbach, H. (1936) ‘L’empirisme logistique et la désagregation de l’a priori’, in: L.Rougier, (red.), Actes du Congrès international de philosophie scientifique. Paris: Herman, pp. 28-36.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Reichenbach, H. (1951) The Rise of Scientific Philosophy, Berkely and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Stadler, F. (2015) The Vienna Circle: Studies in the Origins, Development, and Influence of Logical Empiricism, Cham: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Stern, D. (2007) ‘Wittgenstein, the Vienna Circle, and Physicalism: A Reassessment’, in: A.Richardson en T.Uebel (red.), The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Wittgenstein, L.2010 [1921] Tractatus logico-philosophicus, vertaald door Hermans, W.F., Amsterdam: Athenaeum-Polak & Van Gennep.
    [Google Scholar]