Verleg meta-ethische aandacht van metafysica naar praktisch redeneren

References

1. Asay, J. (2012) A Truthmaking Account of Realism and Anti-Realism, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly93, pp. 373-94. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01431.x.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bagnoli, C. (2019) Ethical objectivity: The test of time. Ratio32(4), pp. 325-338. doi:10.1111/rati.12226.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Balaguer, M. (2020) Moral Folkism and the Deflation of (Lots of) Normative and Metaethics, in: J.L.Falguera en C.Martínez-Vidal (red.) Abstract Objects: For and Against. New York: Springer International Publishing, pp. 297-318. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38242-1
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blackburn, S. (1993) Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bransen, J. (2002) Normativity as the Key to Objectivity: An Exploration of Robert Brandom’s Articulating Reasons, Inquiry45(3), pp. 373-391. doi:10.1080/002017402760258204
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chang, R. (2013) Grounding practical normativity: Going hybrid, Philosophical Studies164(1), pp. 163-187. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0092-z
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dasgupta, S. (2017) Normative Non-Naturalism and the Problem of Authority, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society117(3), pp. 297-319. doi:10.1093/arisoc/aox016.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dasgupta, S. (2020) Undoing the Truth Fetish: The Normative Path to Pragmatism. Manuscript beschikbaar via https://shamik.net/papers/dasgupta%20undoing%20the%20truth%20fetish.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Enoch, D. (2011) Taking Morality Seriously. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Enoch, D. en Weinshtock-Saadon, I. (2023) Oh, All the Wrongs I Could Have Performed! Or: Why Care about Morality, Robustly Realistically Understood. Verschijnend in Oxford Handbook on Moral Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gibbard, A. (1990) Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Heathwood, C. (2012) Could Morality Have a Source?, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy6(2), pp. 1-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v6i2.62
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hopster, J. (2017) Two Accounts of Moral Objectivity: From Attitude-Independence to Standpoint-Invariance, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice20(4), pp. 763-80. doi:10.1007/s10677-017-9796-z.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hussain, N.J. (2012) A Problem for Ambitious Metanormative Constructivism, in: J.Lenman en Y.Shemmer (red.), Constructivism in Practical Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 180-194.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Korsgaard, C. (1996) The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Leary, S. (2017) Non-naturalism and Normative Necessities, in R.Shafer-Landau (red.) Oxford studies in metaethics12. Oxford: Oxford Academic, pp. 76-105. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198805076.003.0004
    [Google Scholar]
17. McPherson, T. en Plunkett, D. (2018) The nature and explanatory ambitions of metaethics, in: T.McPherson en D.Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge, pp. 1-29.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Nagel, T. (1986) The view from nowhere. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Parfit, D. (2011) On What Matters, Volumes 1 & 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Street, S. (2011) Mind-Independence without the Mystery Why Quasi-Realists Can’t Have it Both Ways, in: R.Shader-Landau (red.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics6. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-32. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606375.001.0001.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Street, S. (2016) Constructivism in Ethics and the Problem of Attachment and Loss, Aristotelian Society Supplementary90(1), pp. 161-89.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Väyrynen, P. (2013) Grounding and Normative Explanation, Aristotelian Society Supplementary87(1), pp. 155-178. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8349.2013.00224.x
    [Google Scholar]
23. Wygoda Cohen, S. (2021) Mind Independence versus Mind Nongroundedness: Two Kinds of Objectivism, Ethics132(1), pp. 180-203. doi:10.1086/715278.
    [Google Scholar]