oa De paradoxen van (in)tolerantie in epistemische netwerken

References

1. Aerts, R., de Liagre Böhl, H., de Rooy, P. & Te Velde, H. (2007). Land van Kleine Gebaren: Een Politieke Geschiedenis van Nederland 1780-1990. SUN.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Archer, A., Cawston, A., Matheson, B., & Geuskens, M. (2020). Celebrity, Democracy, and Epistemic Power. Perspectives on Politics, 18, 27–42.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network Propaganda. Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cook, K. S. (2013). Social exchange theory. In J.DeLamater & A.Ward (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 6–88).
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berlin, I. (1969). Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. De Ridder, J. (2021). What’s So Bad about Misinformation?Inquiry.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DiResta, R. (2018, August30). Free Speech Is Not the Same as Free Reach. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/free-speech-is-not-the-same-as-free-reach/
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dotson, K. (2018). Accumulating Epistemic Power: A Problem with Epistemology. Philosophical Topics, 46(1), 129-154.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dutilh Novaes, C. (2020). The Roleof Trust in Argumentation. Informal Logic, 40, 205–236.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dutilh Novaes, C. (2023). Can Arguments Change Minds?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 123(2), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoad006
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fogelin, R. (2005). The Logic of Deep Disagreements. Informal Logic, 25(1), 3-11.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Forst, R. (2009). ‘‘To tolerate means to insult’: Toleration, recognition, and emancipation’. In B.van den Brink & D.Owen (red.), Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Forst, R. (2014). Toleration and Democracy. Journal of Social Philosophy, 45(1), 65-75.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fraser, N. (1990). Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gershberg, Z., & Illing, S. D. (2022). The Paradox of Democracy: Free Speech, Open Media, and Perilous Persuasion. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lagewaard, T. & Ranalli, C. (2022). Deep Disagreement (Part 1): Theories of Deep Disagreement. Philosophy Compass, 17(12).
    [Google Scholar]
18. Landemore, H. (2012). Democratic Reason. Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mill, J. S. (2001). On Liberty. Kitchener. (1859)
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mouffe, C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Nguyen, C. T. (2020). Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles. Episteme, 17(2), 141-161.
    [Google Scholar]
22. O’Connor, C., & Weatherall, J. O. (2019). The Misinformation Age. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Popper, K. (2013). The Open Society and its Enemies. Princeton University Press. Eerste publicatie in 1945.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rijpkema, B. (2015). Weerbare Democratie: De Grenzen van Democratische Tolerantie. Proefschrift, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/37029
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rijpkema, B. (2023). Tolerantie als Democratisch Ethos. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/3619875
    [Google Scholar]
26. Talisse, R. (2019). Overdoing Democracy. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Zollman, K. (2013). Network Epistemology: Communication in Epistemic Communities. Philosophy Compass, 8, 15–27.
    [Google Scholar]