oa Democratic Theorising without False Expectations

References

1. Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A Ladder of Participation, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 35, No. 4, July 1969, pp. 216–224.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Asenbaum, H. (2022). Doing Democratic Theory Democratically. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221105072
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blau, A. (2022). Habermas on rationality: Means, ends and communication. European Journal of Political Theory, 21(2), 321–344.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blumer, H. (1971). Social Problems as Collective Behavior. Social Problems, 18(3), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.2307/799797
   [Google Scholar]
5. Breland-Noble, A., F.J.Streets, and A.Jordan. (2024). Community-based participatory research with Black people and Black scientists: the power and the promise. The Lancet Psychiatry, 11(1), 75–80.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bobbio, L. (2019). Designing effective public participation. Policy and Society, 38(1), 41–57.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Broadley, C., and B.Dixon (2022) Participatory design for democratic innovation: participation requests and community empowerment in Scotland, Policy Design and Practice, 5:4, 444–465, DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2022.2157195
   [Google Scholar]
8. Curato, N., and D.Farrell. (2021). Deliberative mini-publics: Core design features. Policy Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Davis, L. (2022). Anarchism. In: Marks, P., Wagner-Lawlor, J.A., Vieira, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Utopian and Dystopian Literatures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88654-7_26
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dean, R., J.Gagnon, and H.Asenbaum. (2019). What Is Democratic Theory?, Democratic Theory, 6(2), v–xx. Retrieved Mar 29, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2019.060201
    [Google Scholar]
11. Easton, D. (2017). A systems analysis of political life. In Systems Research for Behavioral Science (pp. 428–436). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eidhof, B., & deRuyter, D. (2022). Citizenship, self-efficacy and education: A conceptual review. Theory and Research in Education, 20(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785221093313
    [Google Scholar]
13. Elstub, S. and O.Escobar (2019): Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fahlberg, A. (2023, March). Decolonizing Sociology Through Collaboration, Co-Learning and Action: A Case for Participatory Action Research 1. In Sociological Forum (Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 95–120).
    [Google Scholar]
15. Floyd, J. (2022). Political Philosophy’s Methodological Moment and the Rise of Public Political Philosophy. Soc59, 129–139 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-022-00710-2
    [Google Scholar]
16. Foucault, Michel (1966). Les Mots et les Choses. Une Archéologie des sciences humaine (in French). Paris: Gallimard. p. 320. ISBN 978-2-07-022484-5.
    [Google Scholar]
17. FoucaultM. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. In RabinowP. (Ed.), Essential works of Michel Foucault (pp. 1954–1984). Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fruhstorfer, A., and A.Hudson. (2022). Majorities for minorities: Participatory constitution making and the protection of minority rights. Political Research Quarterly, 75(1), 103–117.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fukuyama, F., Diamond, L., & Plattner, M.F. (Eds.). (2012). Poverty, inequality, and democracy. JHU Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gagnon, J.P. (2018). 2,234 descriptions of democracy: An update to democracy’s ontological pluralism. Democratic Theory, 5(1), 92–113.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Geissel, B. (2023). The future of self-governing, thriving democracies: democratic innovations by, with and for the people (p. 253). Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Guasti, P., & Geissel, B. (2021). Claims of representation: between representation and democratic innovations. Frontiers in political science, 3, 591544.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gherghina, S., Mokre, M., & Miscoiu, S. (2021). Introduction: Democratic deliberation and under-represented groups. Political Studies Review, 19(2), 159–163.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Giraudet, L.G., Apouey, B., Arab, H., Baeckelandt, S., Begout, P., Berghmans, N., … & Tournus, S. (2022). “Co-construction” in deliberative democracy: lessons from the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gorelick, R. (2011). What is Theory?Ideas in Ecology and Evolution4: 1–10, 2011 doi:10.4033/iee.2011.4.1.c
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gramsci, A. (1971). The Intellectuals, in Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Translated and Edited by Q.Hoare and G.N.Smith. New York: International Publishers, pages 3–23.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Habermas, Jürgen (1984). Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by Thomas A.McCarthy. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press. ISBN 978-0-8070-1507-0.
28. Habermas, J. (2015). Knowledge and human interests. John Wiley & Sons.
29. Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and Human Interest, Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Heywood, A. (2004). Political Theory. An Introduction. 3rd edition, New York: Palgrave/McMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Highmore, B. (2002). Everyday Life and Cultural Theory. An Introduction. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lasswell, H. (1951). The Policy Orientation, in D.Lerner & H.Lasswell (eds.) The Policy Sciences, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.
    [Google Scholar]
33. More, T. [1516] (2009). Utopia, Anaconda, Köln.
34. Muller, E.N. (1989). Democracy and inequality. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 868–871.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Niemeyer, S., Veri, F., Dryzek, J.S., & Bächtiger, A. (2024). How deliberation happens: enabling deliberative reason. American Political Science Review, 118(1), 345–362.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Norton, A. (2023). Wild Democracy: Anarchy, Courage, and Ruling the Law. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. O’Doherty, Kieran C. (2013). Synthesising the outputs of deliberation: Extracting meaningful results from a public forum, Journal of Public Deliberation, Vol. 9: Iss. 1, Article 8. Available at: https://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol9/iss1/art8
    [Google Scholar]
38. O’Flynn, I. (2021). Deliberative democracy. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Papanikos, G.T. (2022). The Five Ancient Criteria of Democracy: The Apotheosis of Equality, Athens Journal of Humanities & Arts—Volume9, Issue 2, April 2022—Pages 105–120
    [Google Scholar]
40. Pausch, M. (2019). Democracy Needs Rebellion. A Democratic Theory Inspired by Albert Camus, THEORIA—A Journal of Social and Political Theory, Vol. 66/161, December 2019, pp. 91–107.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pelacho, M., Rodríguez, H., Broncano, F., Kubus, R., García, F.S., Gavete, B., & Lafuente, A. (2021). Science as a commons: improving the governance of knowledge through citizen science. The science of citizen science, 57.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Pineda, E.R. (2024). A Democratic Reckoning?. The Review of Politics, 86(2), 246–249.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Popper, K.R. (1970). Reason or revolution?. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 11(2), 252–262.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sakurai, T. (2021). Introduction to Symposium on Left Authoritarianism: Comparative Politics and Comparative Political Theory, Comparative Political Theory, 1(2), 153–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/26669773-bja10015
    [Google Scholar]
45. Schmidt, M.G. (2000). Demokratietheorien. Eine Einführung, München UTB.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Schmidt, V.A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 6, 2–22.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Schramme, T. (2021). Capable deliberators: towards inclusion of minority minds in discourse practices. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Schumpeter, J.A. (1950). Kapitalismus, Sozialismus, Demokratie. Bern: Francke, 1950.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Shear, B.W. (2008). Gramsci, intellectuals, and academic practice today. Rethinking Marxism, 20(1), 55–67.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations. Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Tamano, K. (2021). Deliberative democracy and the paradox of participation. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 30(1), 122–139.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Taylor, C. (2016). The dynamics of democratic exclusion. In Democracy: A Reader (pp. 544–546). Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., … & Wagenknecht, K. (2021). The science of citizen science evolves. Chapter 1. in Vohland, K. et al (Eds.). (2021) The Science of Citizen Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4. pp. 1–12.
54. Watzlawick, P. (2011). Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes, W.W. Norton & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Weible, C.M., Cairney, P. & Yordy, J.A. (2022). diamond in the rough: digging up and polishing Harold D. Lasswell’s decision functions. Policy Sci55, 209–222 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09451-9
    [Google Scholar]
56. Weiner, G. (2004). Critical action research and third wave feminism: A meeting of paradigms. Educational Action Research, 12(4), 631–644.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Werner, H., & Marien, S. (2022). Process vs. outcome? How to evaluate the effects of participatory processes on legitimacy perceptions. British Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 429–436.
    [Google Scholar]