In de greep van het moederschap | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 45, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0167-2444
  • E-ISSN: 2949-8651

Abstract

Abstract

Some ecofeminists want to reclaim a ‘female nature’ and abilities and skills that are considered ‘feminine’, like female fertility, sexuality and motherhood. They argue that this nature and these skills have been suppressed in a male-dominated world. Other feminists consider this notion of a ‘female nature’ as gender-affirming, sexist or oppressive. Does the reclaiming or reinforcing of a ‘female nature’ lead to an emancipated thinking about gender, or does it prove a patriarchal and misogynistic rule?

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2024.2.004.PUTT
2024-07-01
2024-07-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Badinter, E.De een is de ander. Amsterdam: Contact, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Badinter, E.De mythe van de moederliefde. Amsterdam: Maarten Muntinga, 1983.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beauvoir, S. de, De tweede sekse. Utrecht: Bijleveld, 1978.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Butler, J.“Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory”, Theatre Journal40 (1988) 4.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burg, S. van der, “Hoe word ik vandaag een vrouw?”, Filosofie Magazine13november, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Burgess-Proctor, A.“Intersections of race, class, gender, and crime: Future directions for feminist criminology”, Feminist Criminology1 (2006) 1, 27-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Curvers, E.“De moderne ‘tradwife’ is anti-woke, anti-feministisch en anti-carrière”, De Volkskrant, 8augustus, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Darwin, Ch.De afstamming van de mens, en selectie in relatie tot sekse. Amsterdam: Nieuwezijds, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dyble, M. et. al., “Sex Equality Can Explain the Unique Social Structure of Hunter-Gatherer Bands”, Science348, nr. 6236, 2015, 796-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Friedan, B.De Mystieke Vrouw. Amsterdam: Maarten Muntinga, 1974.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Goff, J. le, & NicolasTruong, De geschiedenis van het lichaam in de Middeleeuwen. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Graeber, D. & DavidWengrow, The dawn of everything. A new history of humanity. London: Penguin Random House, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gur, R. C. et. al., “Sex and Handedness Differences in Cerebral Blood Flow During Rest and Cognitive Activity”, Science217, 1982, p. 659-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gur, R. C. et. al., “Sex Differences in Brain Gray and White Matter in Healthy Young Adults: Correlations with Cognitive Performance”, Journal of Neuroscience19 (1999) 10.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hache, E.“Born From Earth: A New Myth For Earthbounds”, in: Latour, B., PeterWeibel (ed.), Critical Zones: the science and politics of landing Earth. The Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Joy Harvey, J.“Strangers to each other”, in: Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives; Women in Science, 1789-1979, Abir-Am, P. G. & DorindaOutram (red.). New brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1987, p. 47-171.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hrdy, S.Moederschap. Een natuurlijke geschiedenis. Utrecht: Het Spectrum, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hrdy, S.Een kind heeft vele moeders: Hoe de evolutie ons sociaal heeft gemaakt. Amsterdam: Nieuw Amsterdam, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Husain, S.De Godin. Het Matriarchaat. Mythe en Archetype. Schepping, Vruchtbaarheid en overvloed. Kerkdriel: Librero, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Heuvel, N. van den, “Ecofeminisme met en zonder Natuur”, Wijsgerig Perspectief58 (2018) 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jelsma, A.Tussen Heilige en Helleveeg. De vrouw in het Christendom, Den Haag: Boekencentrum, 1975.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. King, Y.The Ecology of Feminism and the Feminism of Ecology, Healing the Wounds: The Promise of Ecofeminism. Plant, Judith ed. Philedelphia: New Society Publishers, 1989. https://files.libcom.org/files/King-%20Ecology%20of%20Feminism.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Martin, C.L. & DianaRuble, “Childrens’s Search for Gender Cues: Cognitive Perspectives on Gender Development”, Current Directions in Psychological Science13 (2004) 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Masters, W., Johnson, V. & Kolodny, R.Masters & Johnson over Liefde en Seks. Het standaardwerk. Baarn: De Kern, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meer, A. van der, Van Venus tot Madonna. Een verborgen geschiedenis. Den Haag: Synthese, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Moore, N.“Ecofeminism as Third Wave Feminism? Essentialism, Activism and the Academy”, in: Third Wave Feminism. A critical exploration. StacyGillis, GillianHowie & RebeccaMunford (eds.), London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Neumann, E.The Great Mother. An analysis of the archetype, New York: Princeton University Press, 1963.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nobis, E.Geen kinderen, geen bezwaar; waarom niet alle vrouwen moeder willen zijn. Amsterdam: Contact, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Plumwood, V.“Feminism and Ecofeminism: Beyond the Dualistic Assumptions of Women, Men and Nature”, The Ecologist22 (1992) 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rodríguez, P.God is als vrouw geboren, Amsterdam: Wereldbibliotheek, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Romanes, G. J.“Mental differences of men and woman”, Popular Science Monthly31 (1887) 383-401.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rousseau, J.J.Emile (Nederlandse vertaling), Meppel: Boom, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rosaldo, M. Z. & LouiseLamphère, Editor’s “‘Introduction’”, in Women, Culture and Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Saini, A.Ondergeschikt. Hoe kennis over vrouwen ons misleidt en wat we daaraan kunnen doen. Utrecht: Uitgeverij Ten Have, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Schipper, M.In het begin was er niemand; hoe het komt dat er mensen zijn. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Scott, L.De XX – economie. Amsterdam: Thomas Rap, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Seymour, J.K.“The Medical Meanings of Sex Hormones: Clinical Uses and Concepts in The Lancet, 1929-1939”. Dissertatie, Wellcome Centre for the History of Medicine at University College London, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Slavenburg, J.Vrijen met God. Zutphen: Walburg Pers, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Smit, L.Echte vrouwen krijgen een kind. Amsterdam: Nijgh & Van Ditmar, 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Solnit, R.De moeder aller vragen. Amsterdam: Podium, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Spencer, H.“Psychology of the Sexes”, Popular Science Monthly4 (1873) 30-38
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Veldhuizen, R.“De landbouwrevolutie als bron van ellende? Meer en meer onderzoek vindt zo’n duidelijk kantelpunt niet”, De Volkskrant27augustus2023.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2024.2.004.PUTT
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error