f De leider in ‘context’: Themanummer ‘De nieuwe kleren van de leider (m/v/x): Leiderschap in tijden van digitalisering, globalisering en flexibilisering’ (deel 2)

References

1. Alvesson, M. (2020). Upbeat leadership: A recipe for – or against – “successful” leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(6), 101439, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101439
   [Google Scholar]
2. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
   [Google Scholar]
3. Banks, G. C., Fischer, T., Gooty, J., & Stock, G. (2021). Ethical leadership: Mapping the terrain for concept cleanup and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101471
   [Google Scholar]
4. Banks, G. C., Gooty, J., Ross, R. L., Williams, C. E., & Harrington, N. T. (2018). Construct redundancy in leader behaviors: A review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 236-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2017.12.005
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
   [Google Scholar]
6. Daniëls, E., Hondeghem, A., & Dochy, F. (2019). A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings. Educational Research Review, 27, 110-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.003
   [Google Scholar]
7. Decuypere, A. (2023). Aandachtige leidercommunicatie in hybride tijden: Pilottest van een nieuwe training. Gedrag & Organisatie, 36(4), 335-380. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2023.4.003.DECU
   [Google Scholar]
8. Decuypere, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2020). Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002219892197
   [Google Scholar]
9. Decuypere, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2021). Exploring the leadership-engagement nexus: A moderated meta-analysis and review of explaining mechanisms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168592
   [Google Scholar]
10. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional and laissez-faire styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569-591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
    [Google Scholar]
11. Edmondson, A. C. (2019). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation and growth. Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Faniko, K., Ellemers, N., & Derks, B. (2022). Lack of ambition or lack of support? Diverging career experiences of men and women explain the persistence of gender bias. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(9), 851-864. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12883
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gregory Stone, A., Russell, R. F., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(4), 349-361. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410538671
    [Google Scholar]
14. Grewatsch, S., Kennedy, S., & Bansal, P. (2023). Tackling wicked problems in strategic management with systems thinking. Strategic Organization, 21(3), 721-732. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270211038635
    [Google Scholar]
15. Grutterink, H., & Vroemen, M. V. (2023). “Wat als mijn baas denkt dat ik het niet kan?!” Metaperceptie als katalysator voor de relatie tussen transformationeel leiderschap, psychologische empowerment en werktevredenheid. Gedrag & Organisatie, 36(4), 381-408. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2023.4.004.GRUT
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haslam, S. A., Alvesson, M., & Reicher, S. D. (2024). Zombie leadership: Dead ideas that still walk among us. The Leadership Quarterly, 101770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101770
    [Google Scholar]
17. Haslam, A. S., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2018). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Heifetz, R., & Linsky, M. (2017). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of change. Harvard Business School Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kelly, R. (2019). Future-proofing organisations for leadership 4.0. In R.Kelly, Constructing leadership 4.0: Swarm leadership and the fourth industrial revolution (pp. 153-174). Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Korkmaz Veli, A., Knappert, L., Van Engen, M. L., Decuypere, A., & Schalk, R. (2024). Leaders’ journey in manifesting inclusive leadership: A poetic view of leaders’ challenges and potential resolutions to those challenges [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Tilburg University.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kroon, B., van Hooft, E. A., & De Witte, H. (2023). Call for papers voor de G&O-reeks ‘Flexibele arbeidsrelaties’. Gedrag & Organisatie, 36(2), 198-200. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2023.2.004.KROO
    [Google Scholar]
23. Mackay, W. (2022). Research in human-computer interaction [Colloque Human-Computer Partnerships]. Collège de France. https://www.college-de-france.fr/agenda/colloque/human-computer-partnerships/designing-human-computer-partnerships
    [Google Scholar]
24. Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
    [Google Scholar]
25. Nijs, S., Van Engen, M., Van der Meer, S., Van Gestel, S., & Odstrčilíková, K. (2024). Wanneer inclusieve leiders het verschil (kunnen) maken: Het belang van supplementaire en complementaire team-fit voor ervaren autonomie, verbondenheid en competentie van werknemers. Gedrag & Organisatie, 37(1), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2024.2.002.NIJS
    [Google Scholar]
26. Oc, B. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004
    [Google Scholar]
27. Peters, B. G. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society, 36(3), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361633
    [Google Scholar]
28. Peters, P., Blomme, R., Coun, M., Abbing-Fokkert, Y., & Nijmeijer, M. (2023). De kracht van empowerend leiderschap voor proactiviteit bij thuiswerken: De rol van zelf-effectiviteit, rolambiguïteit en professionele isolatie. Gedrag & Organisatie, 36(4), 308-334. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2023.4.002.PETE
    [Google Scholar]
29. Retkowsky, J., Akkermans, J., Nijs, S., Jansen, P., & Khapova, S. (2024). Stimuleren van duurzame loopbanen voor flexwerkers: Paradoxen en routes naar een wenselijke toekomst vanuit het perspectief van belanghebbenden. Gedrag & Organisatie, 37(1), 191-221. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2024.2.004.RETK
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sasaki, I., & Ravasi, D. (2024). Historical consciousness and bounded imagination: How history inspires and constrains innovation in long-lived firms. Academy of Management Discoveries, 10(1), 59-90. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2021.0184
    [Google Scholar]
31. Shen, W., & Joseph, D. L. (2021). Gender and leadership: A criterion-focused review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), 100765.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Skaburskis, A. (2009). The origin of “wicked problems”. Planning Theory and Practice, 9(2), 277-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350802041654
    [Google Scholar]
33. Spijker, K. M. I. (2024). Leiderschap en techniek: Een techniekfilosofische benadering over besluitvorming in de toekomst. Gedrag & Organisatie, 37(1), 164-190. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2024.2.003.SPIJ
    [Google Scholar]
34. Stoker, J. (2024) De nieuwe leider in het hemd gezet? Een kritische reflectie op concept, causaliteit en context van leiderschap. Gedrag & Organisatie, 37(1), 222-237. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2024.2.005.STOK
    [Google Scholar]
35. Stoker, J., & Garretsen, H. (2018). Goede leiders zweven niet: De fundamenten van effectief leiderschap in organisaties en de maatschappij. Atlas Contact.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Thaler, R. H., & Sustein, C. R. (2021). Nudge: The final edition. Penguin Putnam.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Tummers, L., & Knies, E. (2016). Measuring public leadership: Developing scales for four key public leadership roles. Public Administration, 94(2), 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12224
    [Google Scholar]
38. Van Engen, M., Decuypere, A., & Bauwens, R. (2022). Call for papers voor G&Othemanummer 2023: De nieuwe kleren van de leider (m/v/nb): Leiderschap in tijden van digitalisering, globalisering en flexibilisering. Gedrag & Organisatie, 35(4), 537-546. https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2022.4.007.ENGE
    [Google Scholar]
39. Van Knippenberg, D., & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.759433
    [Google Scholar]
40. Van Quaquebeke, N., & Gerpott, F. H. (2023). Tell-and-sell or ask-and-listen: A self-concept perspective on why it needs leadership communication flexibility to engage subordinates at work. Current Opinion in Psychology, 53, 101666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101666
    [Google Scholar]
41. Waldman, D. A., & Bowen, D. E. (2016). Learning to be a paradox-savvy leader. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0070
    [Google Scholar]
42. Wilkins, A. L. (1984). The creation of company cultures: The role of stories and human resource systems. Human Resource Management, 23(1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930230105
    [Google Scholar]